“Are we just animals in a zoo?”
Uncategorized
“While Tabak’s letter goes to great lengths to insist that EcoHealth’s work couldn’t have produced SARS-CoV-2, it absolutely vindicates Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who Fauci repeatedly called a liar in July for accusing him of funding GoF research in Wuhan, China.”
“We also learned in September that 18 months before the Pandemic, Daszak applied for a grant to release enhanced airborne coronaviruses into the wild in an effort to inoculate them against diseases that could have otherwise jumped to humans, according to The Telegraph, citing leaked grant proposals from 2018.”
New documents show that just 18 months before the first Covid-19 cases appeared, researchers had submitted plans to release skin-penetrating nanoparticles containing “novel chimeric spike proteins” of bat coronaviruses into cave bats in Yunnan, China.
They also planned to create chimeric viruses, genetically enhanced to infect humans more easily, and requested $14million from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) to fund the work.
Are the COVID Jabs Responsible for Rising Mortality Trends? (mercola.com)
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- According to all-cause mortality statistics adjusted for population growth, the number of Americans who have died between January 2021 and August 2021 is 14% higher than 2018, the pre-COVID year with the highest all-cause mortality, and 16% higher than the average death rate between 2015 and 2019
- Did COVID-19 raise the death toll despite mass vaccination, or are people dying at increased rates because of it?
- The COVID jab killed an estimated 1,018 people per million doses administered during the first 30 days of the European vaccination campaign
- When counting only deaths categorized as COVID-19 deaths, the death toll from the jabs is estimated to be between 200 and 500 deaths per million doses administered. With 4 billion doses having been administered around the world, that means 800,000 to 2 million so-called “COVID-19 deaths” may in fact be vaccine-induced deaths
- Data from 23 countries reveal the number of new COVID cases (i.e., positive tests) after the start of the COVID jab campaign is 3.8 times higher than it was before the rollout of the shots, and the daily COVID death rate is 3.82 times higher
According to all-cause mortality statistics,1 the number of Americans who have died between January 2021 and August 2021 is 16% higher than 2018, the pre-COVID year with the highest all-cause mortality, and 18% higher than the average death rate between 2015 and 2019. Adjusted for population growth of about 0.6% annually, the mortality rate in 2021 is 16% above the average and 14% above the 2018 rate.
The obvious question is, why did more people die in 2021 (January through August) despite the rollout of COVID shots in December 2020? Did COVID-19 raise the death toll despite mass vaccination, or are people dying at increased rates because of the COVID jabs?
Vaccine-Induced Mortality
In a two-part series,2 Matthew Crawford of the Rounding the Earth Newsletter, examined mortality statistics before and after the rollout of the COVID shots. In Part 1,3 he revealed the shots killed an estimated 1,018 people per million doses administered (note, this is doses, not the number of individuals vaccinated) during the first 30 days of the European vaccination campaign.
Between 800,000 and 2 million so-called ‘COVID-19 deaths’ may in fact be vaccine-induced deaths.
After adjusting for deaths categorized as COVID-19 deaths, he came up with an estimate of 200 to 500 deaths per million doses administered. With 4 billion doses having been administered around the world, that means 800,000 to 2 million so-called “COVID-19 deaths” may in fact be vaccine-induced deaths. As explained by Crawford:4
“This does not even include vaccine-induced deaths that have not been recorded as COVID cases, though I suspect that latter number is smaller since the only good way to hide the vaccine mortality signal is to smuggle deaths through the already-established COVID death toll.”
Corroborating Crawford’s calculations are data from Norway, where 23 deaths were reported following the COVID jab at a time when only 40,000 Norwegians had received the shot.
Not taking into account the possibility of underreporting in Norway, that gives us a mortality rate of 575 deaths per million doses administered. What’s more, after conducting autopsies on 13 of those deaths, all 13 were determined to be linked to the COVID jab. As reported by Norway Today back in January 2021:5
“‘The reports might indicate that common side effects from mRNA vaccines, such as fever and nausea, may have led to deaths in some frail patients,’ chief physician Sigurd Hortemo in the Norwegian Medicines Agency noted.
The Norwegian Medicines Agency and the National Institute of Public Health (FHI) jointly assess all side effects reports. As a result, the FHI has updated the corona vaccination guide with new advice on the vaccination of frail elderly people.
‘If you are very frail, you should probably not be vaccinated,’ Steinar Madsen at the Norwegian Medicines Agency said at a webinar on corona vaccine for journalists …”
Is the COVID Jab Responsible for Excess Deaths?
Crawford goes on to look at data from countries that have substantial vaccine uptake while simultaneously having very low rates of COVID-19. This way, you can get a better idea as to whether the COVID jabs might be responsible for the excess deaths, as opposed to the infection itself.
He identified 23 countries that fit this criteria, accounting for 1.88 billion individuals, roughly one-quarter of the global population. Before the COVID jabs rolled out, these nations reported a total of 103.2 COVID-related deaths per million residents. Five nations had more than 200 COVID deaths per million while seven had fewer than 10 deaths per million.
As of August 1, 2021, 25.35% of inhabitants in these 23 nations had received a COVID jab and 10.36% were considered fully vaccinated. In all, 673 million doses had been administered. Based on these data, Crawford estimates the excess death rate per million vaccine doses is 411, well within the window of the 200 to 500 range he calculated in Part 1.
Equally intriguing is the finding that the number of new COVID cases (i.e., positive tests) after the start of the COVID jab campaign is 3.8 times higher than it was before the rollout of the shots, and the daily COVID death rate is 3.82 times higher.
Morocco and Saudi Arabia were the only two nations in which the case rate and COVID death rates went down after the vaccination campaign started. “If deaths were scaled by 3.82 due to the vaccines, then there were 276,465 excess deaths during this time span,” Crawford writes.
He goes through a number of adjustments to remove outliers that might skew the data sets, so for a more detailed review, see the original article. But in summary, after removing nations with more than 100 COVID deaths per million before their vaccination program (to evaluate the impact of the shots alone), he came up with 13 countries with a combined population of 354 million.
The number of doses administered in these 13 countries is similar to the original cohort. The adjusted number of excess deaths per million is now 318, which is still within the 200 to 500 per million range.
Remarkably, though, the number of COVID deaths in these 13 countries is 11.61 times higher post-vaccination, compared to before the jabs were rolled out. In five of the 13 countries, a whopping 90% of their COVID-19 fatalities have been logged after their vaccination campaigns began! This obliterates any fantasy that the COVID injections are actually helping.
“On face, these results reinforce the case that the experimental vaccines are killing people,” Crawford writes. “At the very least, this is one more dramatic [lack of] safety signal that should spur authorities who care about our health to come to the table for a discussion about how to refine the data they’re not analyzing to anyone’s knowledge …
More concerning is that numerous of these nations — largely located in Asia — seemed to have no susceptibility at all to the pandemic prior to vaccination. There are a lot of theories as to why this might be aside from just vaccines triggering deaths.
•Might PCR testing pick up signals from attenuated virus vaccines, resulting in case explosions (from almost none) to match the [new] deaths?
•Could some of these vaccines have faulty production … during polio vaccine rollout? This could result in cases and deaths?
•Paraguay has by far the greatest signal of vaccine-induced mortality. It stands out as one of the only nations on Earth to use both Chinese and also Western vaccines. Is there any reason such a combination could result in more volatile disease spread?
•Do we really believe that the braintrust at the FDA and CDC are entirely unaware of these observations?
Meanwhile, health authorities still seem to have no issue with the lack of risk report or risk-benefit analysis performed by any of the vaccine manufacturers or anyone else. This strikes me as one of the worst signs in my lifetime that corporations have taken over government on an essentially complete level.”
US Whistleblower Highlights Underreporting
In mid-July 2021, America’s Frontline Doctors, represented by Renz Law,6 filed a lawsuit7 against the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra. In that lawsuit, they cite whistleblower testimony by a computer programmer with expertise in health care data analytics and access to Medicare and Medicaid data maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
According to this whistleblower, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) under-reports deaths caused by the COVID shots by a conservative factor of five or more. She claims the number of Americans killed by the shots was at least 45,000 as of July 9, 2021.
At that time, VAERS reported 9,048 deaths following COVID injection. That number is now 16,310 (as of October 1, 20218). Using an under-reporting factor of five, that gives us an estimated death toll of 81,550.
COVID Shots May Have Killed More Than 200,000 in the US
Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, has come up with even more drastic numbers. In the video “Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis,”9 he argues that VAERS can be used to determine causality, and shows how the VAERS data indicate more than 212,000 Americans have already been killed by the COVID shots.10
Anywhere from 2 million to 5 million have also been injured by them in some way. Kirsch is so confident in his analyses, he’s offered a $1 million academic grant to anyone who can show his analysis is flawed by a factor of four or more. He’s even offered $1 million to any official willing to simply have a public debate with him about the data, and none has accepted the challenge.
Woman’s Obituary Blames COVID Vaccine for Her Death
While it may be challenging to determine exactly how many people have died as a direct result of the COVID shots, we can be certain that deaths are occurring.
One Oregon woman’s obituary11 went viral after her family blamed side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine on her death. The family minced no words, calling out state and local governments for their “heavy-handed vaccine mandates.” Jessica Berg Wilson left behind a husband and two young daughters, aged 5 and 3.
“Jessica Berg Wilson, 37, of Seattle, Washington, passed away unexpectedly September 7, 2021 from COVID-19 vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) surrounded by her loving family,” the obituary states.12
“Jessica was an exceptionally healthy and vibrant 37-year-old young mother with no underlying health conditions … Local and state governments were determined to strip away her right to consult her wisdom and enjoy her freedom.
She had been vehemently opposed to taking the vaccine, knowing she was in good health and of a young age and thus not at risk for serious illness. In her mind, the known and unknown risks of the unproven vaccine were more of a threat.
But, slowly, day by day, her freedom to choose was stripped away. Her passion to be actively involved in her children’s education — which included being a Room Mom — was, once again, blocked by government mandate.
Ultimately, those who closed doors and separated mothers from their children prevailed. It cost Jessica her life. It cost her children the loving embrace of their caring mother. And it cost her husband the sacred love of his devoted wife.”
Picture of Jessica (killed by COVID jab) with her family.
COVID Jab Effects Are Rapidly Waning
To add insult to injury, there’s ample evidence showing that whatever benefit you glean from the COVID jab is short-lived, requiring you to risk life and limb yet again with another booster shot (and probably more to come after that).
If you need a refresher on the potential mechanisms of harm, download and read Stephanie Seneff’s excellent paper,13 “Worse Than The Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh.
Among those incriminating data sets is an analysis by Humetrix,14 which assessed the effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against the delta variant among 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries, aged 65 and older. Three key questions answered by the data analysis are:
- Is vaccine effectiveness waning over time?
- Is vaccine effectiveness reduced for the delta variant?
- Does the need for a booster shot vary by sub-population?
The executive summary lays out the answers:
- Yes, the effectiveness of both Moderna and Pfizer’s injections rapidly wane in this cohort.
- As of mid-August 2021, the vaccine effectiveness against delta infection was only 41% and effectiveness against hospitalization due to the delta variant was 62%, both of which are “lower than previously reported.”
- The shots were even less effective in those over the age of 75, and a breakthrough hospitalization risk model suggests prioritizing people over age 65 for boosters.
Breakthrough Infections Don’t Seem so Rare in the Elderly
According to Humetrix, between January 2021 and August 14, 2021, 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries (out of 20 million) were fully vaccinated with either two doses of Pfizer or Moderna, or one dose of Janssen.
Of those, 148,000 experienced a breakthrough infection, 30,000 required hospitalization and 9,400 needed intensive care. That means breakthrough infections in this age group occur at a rate of about 1 in 38, which doesn’t strike me as being particularly rare.
As per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance, patients were only considered fully vaccinated two weeks after the second dose. So, anyone who developed COVID-19 symptoms before then were not counted.
While the analysis reports success, saying the hospitalization rate for breakthrough infections was reduced by one-third compared to the hospitalization rate between March and December 2020, and the death rate in breakthrough infections was reduced six-fold, a central problem remains.
The shots don’t protect you for very long. As shown on Page 8 of the PowerPoint, the breakthrough infection rate at five and six months’ post-vaccination is double the rate at three and four months’ post-vaccination.
Considering the risk of lethal vaccine injury is elevated in the elderly — as noted by the Norwegian Medicines Agency — starting them on a treadmill of booster shots strikes me as an idea that can only end in heartbreak for families around the world.
10/20/21
On the first episode of CHD.TV’s “The Jerusalem Report,” host Ilana Rachel Daniel gave an overview of life in Israel over the past 10 months with news and commentary on vaccine mandates, propaganda, censorship and Pfizer’s dirty deal with the government.
By Children’s Health Defense Team
On the premier episode of CHD.TV’s “The Jerusalem Report,” host Ilana Rachel Daniel explained how her country led the world in time spent in coronavirus lockdowns, describing in detail what it’s been like this past year.
Daniel described how the people of Israel responded to the back-door deal between Pfizer and the Health Ministry that traded a discount on COVID vaccines in exchange for Israeli citizens’ private health and personal data, making Israel the first country to become a massive vaccine experiment.
Daniel said policy decisions were made absent of informed consent, were steeped in coercion and dishonest in intent.
“We are and were the lab rats of the world,” Daniel said. “To date, Israeli citizens have only ever seen a media-released, heavily redacted version of that contract,” between Pfizer and the Israeli government.
Daniel said:
“We’ve heard rumors of an alleged penalty clause if quotas are not reached. We’ve also heard Israeli vaccine developers being pushed out of the running by the government. It would appear we are beholden to Pfizer to the suppression of other treatments.”
She described outdoor mask mandates, citizens on house arrest and vaccine mandates, as well as Isreali passengers being removed from international flights.ORDER TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s New Book — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’
“In a final blow to our claims of democracy,” Daniel said, “we are kept from disclosure of Corona [virus] Cabinet and similar session meeting minutes, as they have been put under a 30-year confidentiality act.”
Daniel quoted the State of Israel as saying, “The public’s right to know isn’t absolute.”
Also in this episode:
- Government-issued tracking devices on travelers to impose quarantine.
- The refusal of Israel to release COVID fatality data, despite all citizen’s medical records being property of the government.
- Israeli doctors are not admitting to vaccine injury. Daniel said trust in the medical establishment is waning among citizens.
- Citizens are afraid to speak out on vaccine injuries and deaths.
- Media propaganda campaigns for COVID vaccines targeted children and pregnant women and hid vaccine injury from citizens.
- Updates on Green Pass, boosters and censorship.
Daniel said the truth will come out. She said The Isreaeli People’s Committee, an independent investigative group reporting adverse events in Israel, and The Testimonies Project are documenting the truth of vaccine injury, government coercion and totalitarian-like conditions in Israel.
“It is clear to many here in Israel and abroad that we fight not only for ourselves, but intentionally for you as well,” Daniel said, reminding viewers that the citizens of Israel are watching the rest of the world fight for medical freedom.
She said, “Your wins, wherever they are found, are ours.”
Watch this week’s episode here:
https://players.brightcove.net/6223967412001/default_default/index.html?videoId=6277304121001
Tune in every Friday at 10:30 a.m. PT / 12:30 p.m. ET to watch a new episode of “The Jerusalem Report” on CHD.TV.
“The Jerusalem Report” is hosted by Ilana Rachel Daniel. Each week Daniel invites listeners to hear the story of an unprecedented COVID response, a mass human experiment thrust upon the entire nation of Israel. Daniel is a health advisor, health and safety researcher, activist and writer.
Published: October 20, 2021
SOURCE: NATIONAL FILE
A new study published in the NIH NCBI database and authored by Harvard professor S. V. Subramanian, Ph.D, and Penn State professor Akhil Kumar, Ph.D claims that vaccination rates have “no discernable relationship” with the amount of new COVID cases, and notes that “In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.”
“At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days,” the report states. “In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days.”
Additionally, the report points out that “The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.”
“Across the US counties too, the median new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people in the last 7 days is largely similar across the categories of percent population fully vaccinated (Fig. 2),” the report continues.
“Notably there is also substantial county variation in new COVID-19 cases within categories of percentage population fully vaccinated. There also appears to be no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with higher percentages of population fully vaccinated (Fig. 3).”
The study further notes that “Of the top 5 counties that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 4 of them as ‘High’ Transmission counties. Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico) counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated with all three being classified as ‘High’ transmission. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as “low” transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% (15) have percentage of population fully vaccinated below 20%.”
Over 2,000 ‘fully vaccinated’ Brits died of COVID-19 last month, public health data recently revealed.
sirtravelalot / Shutterstock.com
Wed Oct 20, 2021
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.
– “Fully vaccinate” people accounted for the vast majority of COVID-19 deaths in Sweden and the U.K. last month, government data has revealed, amid a rise in breakthrough cases and deaths in other Western countries.
The Public Health Agency of Sweden reported earlier this month that 70 percent of COVID-19 deaths between September 1-24 occurred in the “fully vaccinated,” according to Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet. Sweden recorded around 130 fatal COVID cases during that timeframe.
“It is still mainly about the elderly, but vaccine experts still see a tendency towards declining vaccine protection in Sweden,” Svenska Dagbladet said.
Possible reasons for the uptick in vaccinated deaths include “that it has now been quite a while since the oldest ones were vaccinated, that the vaccine coverage has increased, that the restrictions have been eased, and that the Delta strain has taken over,” microbiology researcher Farshid Jalalvand told the paper.
Sweden’s death numbers crashed after health officials scaled back restrictions at the beginning of June, however, with virtually no COVID fatalities reported in the Scandinavian country throughout July and August. Deaths began to climb again by mid-September, by which time nearly 75 percent of Swedes older than 16 were “fully vaccinated.”
Despite Sweden’s mass vaccination campaign, the recent surge in infections has led to the highest number of COVID-19 cases in Swedish senior care residents since February.
New testing protocol announced by Swedish authorities last week may make breakthrough cases less of a factor in future data reporting in any case. On Thursday, the Public Health Agency announced that “fully vaccinated” people with coronavirus symptoms will be exempt from testing requirements, days after the agency revealed the spike in post-vaccination COVID deaths.
UK: 70% of COVID deaths were ‘fully vaccinated’
Recent data published by British health authorities indicated a similar breakthrough surge in the U.K.
A report by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) published October 7 noted that most British COVID-19 deaths in September were among the “fully vaccinated,” as were most hospitalizations. The U.K. has a nearly identical vaccination rate to Sweden’s.
Between September 6 and October 3, 70 percent of deadly COVID cases occurred in the fully-jabbed, according to the UKHSA data, with 2,281 deaths in “fully vaccinated” people and just 611 in the unvaccinated within 28 days of a positive test. Partially vaccinated people accounted for 98 deaths.
The COVID-19 fatalities among “fully vaccinated” Brits represented a dramatic increase from August, The Exposé observed. Public Health England last month had reported 600 coronavirus deaths in the unvaccinated population between August 9 and September 5 and 1,659 in the doubly-vaccinated.
The latest UKSHA figures also showed that vaccinated patients dominated COVID-19 hospitalizations. 3,910 “fully vaccinated” people were admitted to the hospital for COVID between September 6 and October 3, compared with around 2,400 unvaccinated patients. The fully or partially vaccinated together accounted for roughly 64 percent of total COVID-related hospitalizations.
Britain’s rise in COVID-19 breakthrough deaths reflects trends in other highly-vaccinated countries, including the United States.
“I know several people who were in the national security council meeting and the best comment I heard was ‘what we had was 40 minutes of science fiction movies, we were all gobsmacked’… There were 70 pages and 14 videos, they got to see the good stuff. There was a full classified report and 14 videos… but the committees and the White House — they saw the works.”
Congressional intelligence committees were briefed this year with the classified version of the UAP Task Force report. While some members of Congress now know UAP are not adversarial technologies, the majority of lawmakers remain in the dark, at least officially.
https://medium.com/on-the-trail-of-the-saucers/the-secrets-congress-doesnt-know-a6f3fead8160
TRY TO IMAGINE that most Congressional members have not been briefed with the classified UAP task force report. The same individuals that are drafting legislation in the National Defense Authorization Act, pertaining to UAP. Now imagine those members who were given the classified briefing, what they must now know, and what the NDAA legislation doesn’t say.
Let’s find out…
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena or UAP was officially acknowledged for the first time by the United States government on June 25, 2021. The confirmation came from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the UAP Task Force in a document titled Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.
On June 16, 2021, shortly before the declassified version was released for public consumption, Congressman André Carson chaired a classified briefing for members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and its Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation. The briefing was conducted by members of the United States Navy and the FBI. Conspicuously absent in this mix was the U.S. Air Force, let alone the newly created Space Force.
While actual details of the briefing have not been revealed, it’s not a stretch to assume that these elected officials were briefed not only with the classified documents but also viewed hair raising videos of UAP. These videos would likely contain high resolution images of objects that defy gravity, while moving at incomprehensible speeds and performing right angle maneuvers that would defy our current understanding of physics. Here’s what Chairman Carson had to say in his prepared remarks:
“We have to think about the nearly 4,000 satellites that are orbiting the Earth right now. Most of those satellites have cameras attached to them. Why hasn’t any of that information been released?”
It boggles the mind to consider what was divulged, heard and seen in those meetings. We have some insight, however, from Dr. Robert McGwire.
McGwire is an adjunct professor at Virginia Tech, former chief scientist at the Hume Center, and Founder of Hawkeye 360. He also holds a Ph.D. in applied mathematics, Brown University; a BS in electrical engineering, Auburn University. More to the point for this discussion, he’s an avid UFO researcher. In startling comments last spring, McGwire, who says he holds a security clearance but not present at the briefing, told Spaced Out Radio…
“I know several people who were in the national security council meeting and the best comment I heard was ‘what we had was 40 minutes of science fiction movies, we were all gobsmacked’… There were 70 pages and 14 videos, they got to see the good stuff. There was a full classified report and 14 videos… but the committees and the White House — they saw the works.”
Who Else Has Access to the Fully Leaded Version
The US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) also has access to the classified report. It’s led by chairman Senator Mark Warner and vice-chair Senator Marco Rubio. While Warner has mostly kept his powder dry on this one, Senator Rubio has made numerous outspoken appearances on media outlets and has raised concern that UAP was a potential national security threat. Senate Majority leader Harry Reid served on this committee between 2007–2015.
The “Gang of Eight” having high level clearances with access to the classified report includes the leaders of each of the two parties from both the Senate and House of Representatives. The chairs and ranking minority members of both the Senate Committee and House Committee for Intelligence who have exclusive oversight over (WUSAP) projects also have seen it.
Former CIA directors John Brennan and James Woolsey as well as former ONI director John Ratcliffe all came on the record last spring. They indicated national security concerns associated with unidentified aerial phenomenon, and likely knew what would be included in the classified report.
The Obama Turnaround
In 2011 the White House responded to two petitions asking the U.S. government to acknowledge formally that aliens have visited Earth and to disclose any intentional withholding of government interactions with extraterrestrial beings. This is what they said:
“The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race. In addition, there is no credible information to suggest that any evidence is being hidden from the public’s eye.”
That was then, this is now. In a miraculous twist of fate in the spring of 2021 former president Barack Obama confessed that UAP exists and is currently under investigation by the United States Government.
“What is true, and I’m actually being serious here, is there’s footage and records of objects in the skies that we don’t know exactly what they are. We can’t explain how they move, their trajectory. They did not have an easily explainable path,” he added of the mysterious images. “So I think people still take it seriously trying to investigate and figure out what that is.”
The National Defense Authorization Act FY2022
October of 2021, the US Congressional bill for the upcoming FY 2022 National Defense Authorization Act states that a new office will be established within the Office of the Secretary of Defense to carry out, on a Department-wide basis, the mission currently performed by the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force. The language in the NDAA Bill indicates the new agency will provide:
“an assessment of any activity regarding unidentified aerial phenomena that can be attributed to one or more adversarial foreign governments… Identification of any incidents or patterns regarding unidentified aerial phenomena that indicate a potential adversarial foreign government may have achieved a breakthrough aerospace capability.”
While this congressional language presumes that UAP are terrestrial, foreign adversarial technologies, the UAP Report thought differently.
“…incidents documented over the past two decades did not originate from any American military or other advanced U.S. government technology…”
This eliminated the possibility that Navy pilots who reported seeing unexplained aircraft might have encountered programs the government meant to keep secret.
What It Probably Means
There are 535 Members of Congress, 100 serve in the U.S. Senate and 435 serve in the U.S. House of Representatives. It’s estimated that approximately 75 lawmakers have been briefed with the classified report. Which means 85% of Congressional members have not seen the high resolution videos, photographs and accompanying sensor data.
If one could imagine watching a high resolution bona fide government video of an objects moving at unbelievable speeds, performing incomprehensible maneuvers while defying gravity, you would probably be wondering why you’re still speaking English, if you thought this was the Russians or Chinese technology.
It’s incomprehensible that lawmakers serving on the aforementioned intelligence committees could conclude that what they were viewing was foreign adversarial technologies. American adversaries with access to this technology, would constitute the largest intelligence failure in American history, to which we have no defense.
Bear in mind, these are the same individuals that are drafting legislation in the National Defense Authorization Act pertaining to unidentified aerial phenomenon. Compounding matters, Robert Hastings who authored “UFOs and Nukes” interviewed more than 150 military personnel, and said they were:
“…nuclear launch officers, nuclear missile targeting officers, maintenance personnel, security guards who guarded the nuclear weapons facilities, and all of those individuals have told me on tape either audio or video that in fact UFOs have routinely monitored our nuclear weapons dating back decades.”
The National Defense Authorization Act does not include any reference to nuclear site incursions by unidentified aerial phenomenon. Again, from Robert Hastings:
“Nuclear weapons program is an ongoing source of interest to someone possessing vastly superior technology. Significantly, the reported UFO activity occasionally transcends mere surveillance and appears to involve direct and unambiguous interference with our strategic weapons systems.”
Additionally, there are thousands of historical UFO documents currently being ignored by Congress. Many have sightings of similar craft with photographs and video that exhibit the same gravity defying maneuvers as witnessed by US naval pilots today. In the UAP Preliminary report, under the heading “A Handful of UAP Appear to Demonstrate Advanced Technology” —
“Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernible means of propulsion.”
Clearly American adversaries could not have developed the same technology we are seeing today more than 50 years ago.
The tragic reality is that the USG/CIA created and perpetuated a stigma surrounding UFOs decades ago. It succeeded in permeating deep into the American psyche. This was then reinforced by the erroneous conclusions drawn from Project Blue Book. American citizens who witnessed things they did not want to see, and sought answers would face ridicule and persecution which served as a warning for those that dared to follow. Again, from the UAP Preliminary Report —
“Narratives from aviators in the operational community and analysts from the military and IC describe disparagement associated with observing UAP, reporting it, or attempting to discuss it with colleagues. Although the effects of these stigmas have lessened as senior members of the scientific, policy, military, and intelligence communities engage on the topic seriously in public, reputational risk may keep many observers silent, complicating scientific pursuit of the topic.”
The bias and fear perpetuated from this stigma, still exists in Congress today, largely by lawmakers who have not seen the classified report. Lawmakers who have not been briefed can’t draft meaningful legislation on information they don’t have.
Robert Hastings has been interviewing military personnel for more than four decades who are all telling him UFOs are visiting military installations. Apparently these same vehicles are also responsible for ICBM site incursions and they have the ability to turn off our nuclear missiles, at will.
In a recent interview with The Debrief, Lue Elizondo was asked about the nuclear connection and said,
“AATIP was aware of the nuclear connection, there was a lot of information AATIP didn’t have access to that Robert Hastings did, and he did a fantastic job with his book about the nuclear connection.”
Elizondo continued..
More here:
https://medium.com/on-the-trail-of-the-saucers/the-secrets-congress-doesnt-know-a6f3fead8160
Fastwalkers exposes the shocking truth about UFOs and Extraterrestrials, a truth that has been suppressed and hidden for centuries. Fastwalker is the NORAD (North American Air Defense Command) code word used to classify unidentified flying objects (UFO’s) approaching Earth from outer space and entering our atmosphere. The facility tracks hundreds of these “bogeys” each year from a subterranean facility deep inside Colorado’s Cheyenne Mountain. See and hear the people that the governments of the world never wanted you to meet. Over 30 experts who are represented within the fields of medicine, physics, science, aviation, journalism, biology, religion, politics, military and more reveal their experiences and knowledge of UFO encounters. In this definitive documentary about the Alien presence on Earth you will see amazing UFO photos and footage as well as hear firsthand contactees, experiencers, and abductees as they share their amazing and riveting testimonies that lead to only one conclusion – we are not alone and the ruling elite have known this for decades. Mankind’s most carefully guarded secret exposed.
They don’t need an educated population. They want soldiers. Soldiers to die. To feed the 1%. Blood is needed. Here’s the proof, in black and white. Take $10 billion from education and give it to the military, in a time of no war.
So that’s what it’s all about, control and greed.
The lack of humility is astounding. Atwood has won just about every literary award going, has twice been the recipient of the Booker Prize – with five other books shortlisted – and has sold over eight million copies of ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ alone. Yet some clearly see Atwood and think: “What she really needs is lessons in language from me.”
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/537971-margaret-atwood-trans-backlash/
20 Oct, 2021
Dr. Margaret Atwood shows her award after she was made a Companion of Honour by Queen Elizabeth II at an investiture ceremony at Windsor Castle, Windsor, Britain, Ocotber 25, 2019
© Aaron Chown / Pool via Reuters
By Joanna Williams, the founder of the think tank Cieo. She is the author of Women vs Feminism, Why We All Need Liberating From the Gender Wars and is a regular columnist for Spiked. Follow her on Twitter @jowilliams293
Why should award-winning author Margaret Atwood have to endure an online onslaught from trans activists who refuse to acknowledge basic biology, simply for retweeting an article that questions the erasure of the word ‘woman’?
Being woke is hard work. One day you’re playing ‘Handmaid’s Tale’ dress-up to protest cuts to abortion services; the next you’re taking to Twitter to condemn that same novel’s author. One day you’re marching for women’s rights in a full-length red cloak and white hood; the next it’s Margaret Atwood you’re protesting, and you have no idea what to wear.
Despite her world-famous dystopian novel having become synonymous with women’s protests against Donald Trump, Margaret Atwood is no stranger to political vitriol. Back in 2018, she was slammed by the #MeToo movement for the crime of defending due process. Her view that even men accused of sexual misconduct deserve to be assumed innocent until proven guilty was deemed blasphemous by the mob, and Atwood was cast out of good feminist circles.
This time around, it’s not the feminists but the trans community that Atwood has upset – and without actually having said anything at all. Atwood’s latest crime is simply to have retweeted a Toronto Star op-ed that criticised the media, legal, and medical professions for using gender neutral language instead of the word ‘woman’. In the piece, headlined “Why can’t we say ‘woman’ anymore?”, columnist Rosie DiManno argues that gender-neutral language erases women and leaves “well-meaning people tongue-tied, lest they be attacked as transphobic or otherwise insensitive to the increasingly complex constructs of gender.”
DiManno is absolutely right. Even in this era of sexual equality, there are some things that pertain only to women, and most of them are underpinned by biology. If you have periods, a cervix, or a vagina then you are a woman. And if you have given birth you are a mother. Of course, whether through personal choice or a medical condition, many women do not menstruate or get pregnant. But everyone who does, or could do, is female.
As we all now know, biology is considered offensive to trans people and – apparently out of respect – we must all avoid stating basic biological facts. Best-selling author JK Rowling discovered this to her cost when, in June 2020, she poked fun at the headline of an online article discussing “people who menstruate.” “I’m sure there used to be a word for those people,” Rowling tweeted. “Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” The online backlash was fast and furious.
Now it’s Atwood’s turn. For retweeting the “Why can’t we say ‘woman’ anymore?” piece, social media’s standing army of woke critics took it upon themselves to school the 81-year old author on why words are important and language must be inclusive. “No one is stopping you from saying the word woman,” was one popular retort. And it’s true. In the privacy of our bedrooms, with our heads under the duvet, we are free to whisper “woman” all we like. It’s only saying “woman” in public and in relation to our own bodies that leads to banishment from polite society.
But the lessons kept on coming. “We’re just also recognizing that, when discussing repro rights, biology, and many other things, saying ‘women’ is often inaccurate or outright exclusionary,” author Abbie Karlish instructed Atwood. “This is *exactly* how many men reacted when feminists used to argue for gender inclusive language like ‘congressperson’ or ‘he or she’,” scolded an ecologist.
The lack of humility is astounding. Atwood has won just about every literary award going, has twice been the recipient of the Booker Prize – with five other books shortlisted – and has sold over eight million copies of ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ alone. Yet some clearly see Atwood and think: “What she really needs is lessons in language from me.”
Incredibly, this woke schooling didn’t stop with language. Atwood’s critics also decided to teach her about the content of her own best-selling novel. For those unfamiliar, ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ portrays a dystopian world where, following an unknown incident, most women are infertile. The new society is segregated along rigid gender lines and men have total control over women. The few women who are fertile must serve as handmaids and are made forcibly pregnant by male commanders.
Critics thought it ironic that the creator of Gilead should argue for ‘woman’ to be defined by biology. “Big fan of your fiction on the dangers of enforcing extremely rigid bio-essentialist ideas about gender btw,” tweeted one wag. Those wanting to get rid of the word ‘woman’ in the name of inclusion are clearly very confused. They seem to think that liberation comes from separating gender identity from the inconvenience of biology. To return to the fictional Gilead, perhaps they assume that if main character Offred had simply identified as a man she could have been spared the commander’s penis.
But of course, as any ardent reader knows, it wasn’t Offred’s gender identity that was the cause of her oppression, but her biology – the fact that she could get pregnant. Feminists have never sought to be liberated out of womanhood – rather, they have sought to expand what it means to be a woman. Women demanded sexual equality so they could choose to have a career, or to be a mother, or to do both or neither.
In the past, it was men who sought to limit women’s freedom – now it is trans-activists who seek to control what women can say and what they can call themselves. Women have been freed from the control of men, only to find they are being controlled by men in dresses. And this is supposed to be progress?
19 Oct 2021
Military.com
| By Travis Tritten
Three aging Air Force veterans came to Washington, D.C., on Tuesday to again tell their strange and extraordinary stories. A fourth veteran was piped into the National Press Club conference by video feed from the Ozark Mountains in Missouri.
Each veteran’s story is different, but all share one central claim: In the 1960s, UFOs tampered with nuclear weapons managed by the Air Force, both terrifying and mystifying the airmen who experienced the encounters. Some remained silent for decades, they say.
And none has captured the attention of Washington, even as reports of Navy encounters with unknown flying objects have splashed across national headlines and pushed UFOs back into the political mainstream for the first time in decades.
“I waited 40 years before I opened my mouth, and that’s a long time,” said David Schindele, a retired captain who served as a nuclear missile launch control officer at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. “I had this terrible secret on my mind for all that time, and I felt such great relief to finally admit to my friends and close relatives what I experienced in the Air Force.”
Other accounts, such as the story told by veteran Robert Salas of a glowing red-orange craft hovering at the gate of a Minuteman intercontinental ballistic missile silo in Montana, have been told for decades and folded into the growing universe of UFO lore. Salas was part of a similar press conference in the same downtown press club in 2010.
Through the years, the government remained indifferent at best to decades-old reports of saucer craft toying with the world’s most powerful weapons during the Cold War. The Air Force funded a university study commonly known as the Condon Report in the 1960s, which found no evidence to support the claims — and recommended against further studies.
But it is a different Capitol for Salas and his fellow true-believer veterans in 2021. The UFOs they claim appeared in the 1960s have been eclipsed by the more recent accounts of Navy witnesses and fighter jet footage of what the Pentagon now calls unexplained aerial phenomenon, or UAP.
Salas has spent years gathering other Air Force veterans who have signed witness affidavits describing their own alleged encounters decades ago. He claims the evidence shows UFOs appeared at various times and took 20 Minuteman ICBMs off-line at sites in the central U.S. over an eight-day period.
“Never had we seen a situation like this,” Schindele explained.
Schindele said he and his commander visited a missile launch site near Minot in September 1966, and eight airmen there told him that 10 missiles at silos in the vicinity all went down with guidance and control malfunctions when an 80- to 100-foot wide flying object with bright flashing lights had hovered over the site.
Salas, who was a first lieutenant stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, in 1967, said he was on duty as a deputy missile combat crew commander deep in the underground nuclear missile control room. The site’s flight security controller called from above ground and was panicked and shouting, Salas claims.
“He said there was a large glowing, pulsating red oval-shaped object hovering over the front gate,” according to Salas’ affidavit. As he woke his commander, he claims alarms went off showing nearly all 10 missiles shown in the control room had been disabled.
Robert Jacobs, who attended the UFO press conference via video link from Missouri, said he was a first lieutenant in the Air Force and stationed at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, in 1964 when he was asked to set up a telescope video camera to capture an Atlas rocket test.
He claims the video showed a disc-shaped craft flew up to the dummy warhead as it traveled about 8,000 mph over the Pacific Ocean, circled it and shot it with several beams of light.
“It went around the top of the warhead, fired a beam of light down on the top of the warhead,” Jacobs said Tuesday. After circling, it “then flew out the frame the same way it had come in.”
Jacobs, who once shopped around the story and eventually sold it to the National Enquirer tabloid, said the film footage was cut and taken at the time by two men in gray suits, and his commander ordered him not to talk about it.
Meanwhile, the UAP cockpit footage from Navy encounters in the Pacific in 2004 and Atlantic in 2015 appear to back up eyewitness accounts from pilots who reported a craft that looked like a giant white “Tic Tac” flying without wings or propulsion systems, and a flying cube inside a clear sphere that passed between two fighter jets.
The encounters by naval aviators, first revealed in 2017, were followed by official acknowledgment from the Navy. The disclosures caused alarm on Capitol Hill, where some lawmakers worried China or Russia had leapfrogged U.S. defense technology. Congress ordered a report in June on what was known about UAPs.
The initial assessment from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was inconclusive, saying not enough data exists to determine the nature of UAPs but that they may present a national security risk.
Salas called it a stunning admission. The veterans gathered at the press conference Tuesday pointed to the ODNI report as a potential breakthrough in their own unacknowledged accounts.
“I have certainly never seen anything like this before,” Salas said of the report. “This is real. It’s not visionary, it’s not swamp gas, and so where do we go from here?”
For the Pentagon, it means reorganizing to better collect and analyze UAP data. Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks ordered up a plan and potential overhaul of the UAP Task Force headed by Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro.
The Pentagon has declined to provide any public updates on the process. The Navy deferred any questions for Del Toro this week and said only the Pentagon could speak on the issue.
Whether Salas, Schindele, Jacobs and other Air Force veterans who had made similar claims will succeed in convincing others to take their assertions seriously remains a question mark.
“Have we been ignored? For God sakes, we’ve been shut up and silenced,” Jacobs said. “We’ve been ridiculed; we’ve had our lives disrupted. This is more than just being ignored. We’ve been treated like imbeciles.”
— Travis Tritten can be reached at travis.tritten@military.com. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Tritten.
Related: US Report Can’t Explain UFOs, But Says They’re Likely Real and Possibly a National Security Threat
