Leave Taiwan alone and get out of Tibet, it’s not yours!
Whatever you say China. Taiwan is not yours. Tibet is not yours. Stop acting like the good old USA and get the hell out of territories that do not belong to you.
Get out Tibet China and forget about Taiwan! They are not yours.
Trump stirred outrage last week when he made a phone call out of order to Taiwanese leader Tsai Ing-wen, whom China does not recognize as official. This angered Beijing, and spurred Trump to tweet out a series of messages taking issue with Chinese trade policy in response – as well as wondering why he can’t hold a phone call with the Taiwanese leader when the US already openly sells it weapons.
A new editorial in the Global Times, a tabloid branch of the Communist Party-owned People’s Daily newspaper to strike back at the president-elect, questioning his intentions toward Beijing.
“It is uncertain whether Trump went up against China because he had been irritated by some chiding comments on his receiving a phone call from Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen, or this was a shrewd step in a well-considered China policy. Anyhow, his response is unexpected,” the editorial read.
The authors also wonder if the “unpredictable” Trump is suddenly no longer as isolationist as he made out to be, and whether he was spurred on by an outside force to take a tough line with China, whom he earlier also accused in a tweet of “[devaluing] US currency” and building “a massive military complex” on a disputed island in the South China Sea.
“No matter what the reasons are behind Trump’s outrageous remarks, it appears inevitable that Sino-US ties will witness more troubles in his early time in the White House than any other predecessor. We must be fully prepared, both mentally and physically, for this scenario.”
But Beijing’s main point here is that Trump will have to defer to China – because it’s the stronger player, economically.
“Trump can make a lot of noise but that does not exempt him from the rules of the major power game,” the Global Times writes. “He doesn’t have sufficient resources to deal with China wantonly, the second largest economy, the biggest trading country and a nuclear power. His many words will not become deeds. What’s more, except for some political radicals, most US people won’t want to take the risk of sinking into a major-power conflict.”
There follows a suggestion that all the newfound power is going to Trump’s head.
“Trump’s reckless remarks against a major power show his lack of experience in diplomacy. He may have overestimated the power of the US. He may have already been obsessed with the power he is about to have a grip on… He may also believe that if China, the biggest power after the US, is awed by Washington, it will solve all other problems.”
The editorial then promises that China will adapt to the new challenges of a Trump presidency, and “must be determined to upset his unreasonable requests at his early time in office, and fight back if his moves harm China’s interests, regardless of the consequences to the dynamics of the Sino-US relationship.”
China and Taiwan are on especially shaky ground at the moment, as Tsai is known for her opposition to a unified China, while the latter considers Taiwan a province. The Chinese made no secret that Taiwan’s recent weapons deal with the US has been a source of much anger.
Ignoring the potential minefield, Trump made the protocol-breaking call to congratulate Tsai on her recent election (although he later tweeted out that it was Tsai who had actually called him).
According to Trump’s transition office, both noted “the close economic, political and security ties between Taiwan and the United States.”
This led first to damage control from Trump running-mate Mike Pence, and then to China losing its normally calm disposition to the American leader-in-waiting’s unpredictability.
Though the US does not recognize Taiwan as a separate country, a 1979 law governing relations with the island obligates Washington to provide the government in Taipei with “sufficient self-defense capabilities” and come to its protection in case of a Chinese attack, according to the State Department.