The United States Has Been Overthrown What has taken its place?
Paul Craig Roberts
The United States has undergone a coup. Having observed no martial conflict, you might think that I have gone off my rocker. But not all coups are physically violent. They can occur because poisonous ideas take hold and subvert society. The United States is defined by the Constitution, and when the Constitution is eroded away, so is the United States.
The Constitution has been eroding away for a long time. The liberals said the Constitution had to be a living document, which means that it is forever changing, which means redefined, which means eroded.
The Tenth Amendment was lost to Abraham Lincoln. George W. Bush got rid of habeas corpus in the name of national security when he declared that the “terrorist threat” gave him the power to hold American citizens indefinitely without presentation of evidence to a court, without trial and conviction. And he did. Obama one-upped Bush. He said he could execute American citizens on suspicion alone without due process of law. And he did. Bush and Obama were not held accountable for their violation of the US Constitution.
Today free speech and association are dead letter rights. Everyone can now censor our free speech–employers, school boards, people claiming they are “offended,” social media, print, and TV media. People who say something “offensive” can be erased and never heard from again. What this means is that whoever controls the right to be “offended” can cancel the free speech of those who cannot claim to be “offended.” Without free speech, there is no debate, just the imposition of approved views.
In Woke America, this is the situation today.
You can also tell a coup has occurred when traditional patriots like Make America Great Again Trump supporters and Oath Keepers are demonized by media and government officials as “domestic extremists,” persecuted, and imprisoned on false charges, such as the Americans who attended a rally in support of Trump and were turned, with Republican complicity, into “insurrectionists” who tried to seize control of the government by taking selfies of themselves sitting in Nancy Pelosi’s chair.
When something so juvenile can be designated an insurrection, you know a coup has occurred. The message is clear. Those supporting the established order against the coup that is being imposed are enemies of the people.
You can also tell a coup has occurred when perversity of all kinds, particularly sexual, is celebrated and normality is derided as “fascism” or some form of phobia or another word of abuse. When the moral high ground is held by LGBT– people who cannot reproduce–and nature’s norm of heterosexual is regarded. as an unjustified definition of normality, the natural order has been overthrown.
That’s where we are today. Soon pedophilia will be declared normal, and there will be brothels where formerly depraved people, now normalized, can have sex with children.
Impossible, you say, but not, for once one perversity is legitimized, all others follow, as we have experienced. It is just a matter of time. Once the rot starts, it doesn’t stop until the job is finished. We already have one foot in Sodom and Gomorrah, and the other foot is drawing nearer.
The Facts: Sonia Poulton, a British journalist, social commentator, and filmmaker, has been investigating the dark web of pedophilia for years. Some of her research has been compiled into a documentary called “Pedophiles In Parliament.”
Reflect On: Evidence has been emerging for decades with regards to this type of activity in ‘high profile places.’ Why, only now, is the entire planet starting to wake up to this fact? Reflect on how much power and control these people have.
”They use all forms of persuasion to prevent people from speaking out, to silence people. Threats, intimidation, blackmail, financial deprivation. And all types of harassment such as put under intensive surveillance, telephone tapping, all of this. They pull out the stops and they have unlimited funds because those funds are supplied by the tax payer” Andrea Davison, Former Intelligence Agent (source)
Whilst the global press is focusing on Prince Andrew’s alleged involvement with Jefferey Epstein’s child trafficking sex ring, this may, in fact, actually pale in comparison to other criminal activity involving children by the hands of the British Establishment.
Sonia Poulton, a British journalist, social commentator, and filmmaker, has been investigating the dark web of pedophilia for years that connects Margaret Thatcher, ‘Sir’ Edward Heath, David Cameron, Theresa May, and Jeremey Corbyn to the cover-up (and for some, the actual facilitation) of sex crimes against children. It is thought that this cover-up, may have been going on for at least 30 years.
Her documentary ‘Paedophiles in Parliament’ is a shocking expose which links many MPs to child abuse. Sonia exposes how the British Royal Family is also tied into this.
Prominent Royal members were openly well-known friends to the now-deceased and notoriously depraved pedophile Jimmy Saville. Curiously, it is said that he had access to the Palace whenever he liked. With MI5 and Scotland Yard having the job of ‘vetting’ everyone around the Royals, it would have been known to them, that Jimmy Saville at the very least, had a very bad reputation and really was not ‘royal’ material.
Yet, he had a very close relationship with Prince Charles, for decades.
People are seen on train on the London Underground. (File photo by AFP)
Sexual assaults have been on the rise on the London Underground over the past four years, according to new figures, which say incidents that are being reported are just the tip of the iceberg.
Incidents reported on the London Underground — also known as the Tube — show that sexual assaults have soared by 42 percent in the last four years, according to an analysis by the UK national news agency, PA media.
The attacks recorded on the Underground jumped from 844 in 2015-2016 to 1,206 in 2018-2019, according to the report.
Transport for London (TfL) reported in the meantime that such abusive behavior occurs more commonly in the day, with the longer, busier lines seeing more assaults.
In the 12 months to March 2019, there were 305 recorded sexual assaults on the Central line, making up about a quarter of the total for the year, according to TfL.
Campaigners, however, say sexual assaults are still under-reported and that they need to do more to stop attackers before they strike.
A campaign has been launched by the London police and TfL — entitled “Report It To Stop It” — which works to encourage anyone who experiences unwanted sexual behavior on public transport to report the incident.
“With the campaign in place since April 2015, we fully expected to record a rise in sexual offenses and, though it is clearly a concern that so many people are affected by this type of crime, it is pleasing that previously reluctant victims of sexual offenses now have the confidence to report this to us,” said Detective Inspector David Udomhiaye.
The British Transport Police (BTP) said they expected a rise in sexual assaults following a drive to encourage victims to report unwanted sexual behavior.
Andrea Simon, the End Violence Against Women Coalition’s head of public affairs, however, said it is not enough to just encourage the reporting of sexual harassment and assaults, and that offenders need to be identified and stopped alongside this.
“More undercover patrols take place on the Central line than any other line and a programmed of work is under way to install CCTV on the line as quickly as possible from 2020.” she said.
“CCTV shows that they will move around the transport network looking for women to target, most often during the commuter rush hours when the tube network is busiest,” she added.
TfL director of policing, Siwan Hayward, said to further prevent abusive behaviors, they have dedicated some 3,000 police and police community support officers to catching the attackers.
– The daughter of famed science fiction author Marion Zimmer Bradley has written an autobiographical account revealing the horrors of growing up in a home raised by LGBT parents who repeatedly sexually abused her and her brothers.
“I have heard all the customary protestations. ‘Your parents were evil because they were evil, not because they were gay,’ but I disagree,” writes Moira Greyland in her new book, The Last Closet: The Dark Side of Avalon.
“The underlying problem is a philosophical one that is based on beliefs that are not only common to gay culture but to popular culture. And this is the central belief: All Sex is Always Right No Matter What,” she wrote.
“I had both biological parents in the home, but both refused to act like traditional parents,” writes Greyland. “I needed my father to protect me and to see me as a girl instead of refusing to protect me and seeing me as an amorphous nothing who competed with him for boys. I needed my mother to love me and hold me and comfort me instead of being a terrifying, angry dictator. Worse than that, I was expected to not want them to love me and protect me, or to act like normal parents. I was supposed to be happy that they were doing their own thing, no matter what they did to us.”
The Last Closet has been an Amazon bestseller for weeks as a Kindle e-book, and is scheduled to be published as a print book this month. Over one hundred readers have reviewed it, and virtually all have given it five stars.
The book recounts Greyland’s life with her mother, who was the author of The Mists of Avalon and many other famous works of science fiction and fantasy, and her father, Walter Breen, who was a world-renowned authority on numismatics. Both identified as “gay,” both abused drugs and were involved in occult practices, and both were pedophiles, Greyland says, a claim that has been confirmed by her only surviving brother.
The couple’s LGBT ideology was constantly imposed on the children by both parents. Greyland says that Zimmer Bradley expected her to take on masculine mannerisms and to become a lesbian, and was disappointed in her attraction to the opposite sex, accusing her of being a “breeder.” Greyland also had to hide from her parents her conversion to Christianity which would have been received with terrible derision.
Alarmingly, Greyland reveals that her parents’ sympathetic views of pedophilia and pederasty had been a public fact for decades, one known particularly among science fiction and fantasy fans who attended fan conferences. Science fiction fans documented Breen’s molestation of at least ten children by 1963, which had only resulted in his temporary exclusion from the largest science fiction fan convention, Worldcon, and was never reported to the police. Breen continued to attend conferences for many years afterward, baiting children he targeted with abuse with various science education gadgets that would attract their attention.
Greyland writes that Breen was an open member of the “North American Man-Boy Love Association,” and he saw his pederastic proclivities as a natural consequence of his homosexuality. He and Zimmer Bradley jointly published a journal on pederasty and pedophilia, The International Journal of Greek Love, in 1965 and 1966, and Zimmer wrote an article for it treating lesbian pedophilia in a positive manner.
“Indeed, the hypocrisy in Davis’ case is beyond obvious, especially given the fact that he had written an op-ed for the Huffington Post in 2014 in which he boasted that his organization, Youth to End Sexual Violence, was helping to prosecute those who exploit children for sex.”
(MPN) — The 22-year-old co-founder of a charity that advocates for victims of sexual violence was arrested on Tuesday in New York for possession of child pornography and for working to arrange sexual encounters with children as young as two years old. Joel Davis — who helped found Youth to End Sexual Violence, and chaired the UN’s International Campaign to Stop Rape and Gender Violence in Conflict — has been charged with several counts, including attempted sexual exploitation of a minor and enticement of a minor to engage in sexual activity, after exchanging messages with undercover federal agents earlier this month.
During those text message exchanges, Davis had told undercover law enforcement officers that he was sexually interested in children of all ages, including infants, and had sent the officers explicit photographs of infants and toddlers. Some of the photos showed the minors engaged in sexual activity with adults.
Davis, who had previously been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2015 and had served as the U.S.’ Youth Ambassador on Sexual Violence in Conflict, also told the officers of his intention to engage in sexual activities with an undercover officer’s nine-year-old daughter and the two-year-old daughter of the officer’s girlfriend. He is alleged to have gone into great detail about the sexual activities he wished to perform with the children.
A full copy of the complaint against Davis is available here.
After his arrest, Davis allegedly admitted that he had abused a 13-year-old boy in the past and that he kept pornographic images of children on his phone.
Conduct Unfathomable as It Is Sickening
Joel Davis, chairman of Youth to End Sexual Violence, poses with Zainab Bangura, the UN’s SRSG-SVC.
In a statement, U.S. Attorney General for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey Berman, said:
The conduct alleged against Joel Davis is as unfathomable as it is sickening, and as this case demonstrates, law enforcement will keep its watchful eye on the darkest corners of the internet to bring predators to justice.”
FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge William F. Sweeney Jr. also condemned Davis, stating:
Having started an organization that pushed for the end of sexual violence, Davis displayed the highest degree of hypocrisy by his alleged attempts to sexually exploit multiple minors. […] Crimes against children such as those alleged are taken very seriously by the FBI, and we continue to work tirelessly to investigate those who place the most helpless members of the American public at risk.”
Indeed, the hypocrisy in Davis’ case is beyond obvious, especially given the fact that he had written an op-ed for the Huffington Post in 2014 in which he boasted that his organization, Youth to End Sexual Violence, was helping to prosecute those who exploit children for sex.
At the time, Davis wrote:
Youth to End Sexual Violence is one example of how youth-led organizations around the world are standing together in solidarity – demanding a seat at the discussion table for youth survivors, activists, and leaders. We are also using media and technology to share the global call to prevent, protect, and prosecute, and working with governments and civil society organizations to report on how young people are affected by warzone rape.”
Despite the public persona he sought to create, Davis was yet another child predator hiding in plain sight.
We are now in the vortex of a major sexual epidemic. Are they putting something in the drinking water?
“By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes.” — Shakespeare, Macbeth
The other day I received an email from a young man with an odd polysyllabic name of African provenance. I copy and paste his email exactly as written:
Dr Darkmoon,
I read your article on pornography and I’ve read so many other articles. I’ve been a porn addict for the past 7 years now and it’s quite scary that masturbation and porn damages the brain. Im just 20, with that, it raises questions like can I ever be someone great in life. I have dreams just like everyone else and I feel like I’m plunging greatly into my fall and demise. Even if I live, I don’t think I can live my full potential. Its quite sad. I just need to know if there’s hope to quitting this addiction and if at all I eventually quit, can I become fully okay from the effects. Thank you. Please Reply.
(Name withheld)
This was not the first request for sexual counseling I have received. Ever since my early articles on sexual politics in the Occidental Observer, I have received dozens of letters from all over the world asking for advice on sex problems. Needless to say, I am not a qualified sex therapist and the only advice I can dispense is the advice of an amateur agony aunt.
The sexual temptations that are nowadays dangled in the face of most men (and women too) are so outrageously extreme that the heroic St Anthony himself, had he encountered such powerful stimuli, would have been driven to despair. Ever since the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, the sheer toxicity of this imagery has increased tenfold. As I noted in my essay on porn addiction:
“Pornography is no longer the relatively mild aphrodisiac it used to be in the Summer of Love, 1967, when the Sexual Revolution first began to take off. With the advent of the internet and the advance in audiovisual communications, its lethality has increased exponentially.
Future advances in the area of holographic images and reality drugs threaten to make porn so irresistible to future generations that ordinary sex as we know it will pale into insignificance and fail to exercise its customary charms. Autoeroticism will then reign supreme; and the zombie sex addict, dead-eyed and drooling with unquenchable lust, will inherit the earth and turn it into a vast masturbatorium.
This is one vision of the sex dystopia to come: a science fiction nightmare that has every chance of being realized. This is a world in which only the sexually fit will survive as the masters, those schooled to self-discipline and impulse control. The weak-willed and degenerate will not necessarily die out. They will simply sink into the amorphous lumpenproletariat as permanent slaves.”
Faced with acute problems such as these, many men are helpless and hopelessly addicted to pornography. Contrary to public misconceptions, women are by no means immune to these new vices, and even children in vast numbers are being sucked into the net of sexual vice.
Here is a young woman who was hooked on internet porn at the age of eleven:
It started as an innocent Google search. I was eleven. I wanted to know more about one of my favorite singers, so I searched her name. I ended up on a fan site, which had a chat room.
A few weeks later, I was chatting with a few people and one of them sent me a link. They told me to click it and not to worry about the part where it asked if I was eighteen, I’d like what I saw. I naively clicked and opened a porn site. At first, I was mostly surprised. I didn’t know it was wrong. I was curious. Something in me was shocked, but another part of me wanted to know and see more.
So I came back. Again. And again, every day. Soon I was saying goodnight to my parents then waiting until I heard my dad snoring to sneak back downstairs to the computer to watch porn. Every night, for hours and hours. I’d be quiet, turn off the sound, and clear the history after I was done.
Inevitably, I began to mimic what I saw on the screen. I started masturbating every day. Several times a day. I was hooked. I loved it, it was my secret and nobody knew. I withdrew from my family and friends.
I started making excuses to stay home alone…especially on Sundays when the whole family would go out to church. I’d say I was sick, or some other excuse. I didn’t really believe in God, anyways, so I didn’t care. I just wanted sex. I wanted to watch more porn. It got so bad that I’d go to my job as a babysitter, put a movie on for the kids, and then watch porn until the parents came back. I almost got caught more than once. But I was good at lying. My parents and family were too caught up in the busy chaos of homeschooling and taking care of the babies to notice. They never knew.
I built a world in my head. A world where I was that bad girl with huge boobs and all those guys going crazy for me. I was a stripper, a hooker, or a famous porn star. And I was good at what I did. But none of it was real.
I started cheating in schoolwork to make up for my lack of sleep and addiction. I had no desire for anything else. I became even sneakier, telling lies was my first language.
Thankfully, God radically broke in and saved me a few months before I turned fourteen. But three years of my life had been wasted, utterly consumed by my pornography addiction. I haven’t masturbated or been involved in porn in over six years now, but it still affects my life seriously. I would have reoccurring rape nightmares, and my mind is still a battlefield as I try to forget the thousands of images and filth that filled those years…. (See here)
That porn addiction has an even more devastating effect on little boys is another closely guarded secret.
Oxbow Academy (pictured here), an expensive residential treatment center in the wilds of Utah, is in fact a lock-down facility reserved exclusively for 13-to-17-year-old boys. Internet pornography has turned these youngsters into virtual masturbation machines.
Here in a soothing therapeutic atmosphere —”New Hope, New Help, No Secrets” is the school motto—emotionally damaged little boys who cannot stop masturbating to online porn are sent by their worried parents to be “cured”.
As part of their therapy, Oxbow has implemented a prison-like regimen for the boys. Kept under constant supervision by staff members and allowed only 10 minutes in the bathroom, the boys are monitored by video cameras and motion detectors at all times. Even while asleep. This is to stop them masturbating to past memories of porn. These memories torment them night and day, months after their last contact with inflammatory online imagery.
Shawn Brooks, founder of Oxbow Academy, admits ruefully: “They have a hard time not masturbating every 15 or 20 minutes.”
OBSESSION WITH INTERNET PORN
“Most porn addicts get agitated when they’re deprived of their online sources. But one boy from Chicago actually got the shakes, like a drug abuser. He was in very poor shape when he arrived. He’d been on his computer 10 to 12 hours a day looking at porn. He wasn’t eating, he was dehydrated, had poor hygiene. He’d done nothing but watch porn.” — Stephen Schulz, director of Oxbow Academy.
— § —
Some months ago I received this email from a man in a Scandinavian country. I copy his letter verbatim — no changes. Make allowances for his poor English:
Hi Doc,
I have red your article Pornography’s Effect on the Brain. It says all the details. I am almost driving in that direction where my sex appetite looking for different paths.
I introspected my self and it’s not me. I am wasting marriage life. My actual problem is fantasy. I don’t watch everyday but those images stocked in my brain. Now a days, when i see ordinary beauty women I feel to intimate with her. This is very annoying me. Mostly, i ejaculate in early mornings with masturbation in bed due to fantasy dreams. After ejaculate, I woke up and feel guilty. I am unable to enjoy the pure essence of sex with my spouse.
I used to practice mediation 3 years ago very sincerely. But now, during mediation brain can’t stabilize and over took bye sexual fantasy images.
Can you tell me what are the best practices to come out of this addiction?
Looking forward for ur reply.
Cheers,
K.P. (name redacted)
No, dear K.P., I cannot help you! Nothing I say will be of the slightest use. If even your wife cannot help you, how can I?
Yesterday, an article in the Daily Mail shocked me to the core. It was about a Church of England vicar, the Reverend Stennett Kirby, who spent most of his time, while not conducting religious services for his parishioners, masturbating to pornography and obtaining multiple orgasms with the help of crack cocaine, legal sex poppers, and other powerful aphrodisiacs.
“I’M A VERY HAPPY MAN.”
Rev Stennett Kirby, shown in a secretly-recorded video sitting on a sofa with a friend and apparently watching porn and talking about sex escorts.
It isn’t clear to me how this sexually hyperactive man of God managed to get himself ordained by the Church of England. It obviously took some doing. Shocking footage shows the sex-crazed vicar inhaling from a crack pipe and snorting cocaine before declaring “I’m a very happy man.”
The 64-year-old is seen lighting some sort of pipe before snorting a suspicious white powder, in footage published by The Sun on Sunday. He is said to have talked about paying for a female escort, adding: “I wish I could. If I had money, I would. I’ve only got £10 left.”
The priest also apparently discussed buying the legal drug poppers on a visit to Soho in central London.
Mr Kirby is the vicar of West Ham Parish Church in Stratford and has held the position since 2007.
At a service on Sunday morning, the Rev Stephen Chandler, an associate minister at the church, broke the news to the congregation. He said:
“By now many of you may have heard of an article which has appeared online today concerning your vicar, the Revd Stennett Kirby. I am trying to support Stennett pastorally at this demanding time for him and he is very much in my prayers and Bishop Stephen’s [of Chelmsford], as are you all here at All Saints.
“The article contains serious allegations with regard to drug taking and other matters of an ethical nature. These allegations will now be investigated by the archdeacon.”
I really feel sorry for this pill-popping, porn-addicted seeker of multiple orgasms. Surely he could have picked a more appropriate line of work? Like, for example, a bouncer for a strip club. Why become a priest if all you’re interested in is sex escorts, crack cocaine, and jerking off endlessly to porn videos?
It makes no sense to me. Something’s seriously wrong. As the witch in Macbeth said, “By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes.”
A parishioner of the masturbating man of God, who did not want to be named, is quoted as saying: “No-one would have known about this before the announcement. Everyone is very shocked.”
You can bet your life everyone’s shocked.
I keep saying to my friends almost every day, “Nothing shocks me anymore.” And then the next day I’m proved wrong. Something crops up that shocks the hell out of me.
What next? Is the Pope going to put in a good word for cannibalism and pedophilia? Are child sex brothels to be legalized in Europe, prompting the British people to abandon Brexit and apologize for voting to leave the enlightened European superstate?
Anything’s possible; the unexpected is the new expected.
One of these days, the way we’re going, we’re going to have explicit porn on every TV channel. MPs, not particularly well known for their sexual restraint, will be jerking off in parliament while passing new laws to make everyone else model citizens.
I said this a few years ago. I haven’t changed my mind. This is truer than it ever was before:
That pornography damages the character, weakens the will, and produces sexual deviance in those it infects, can no longer be doubted. That it can even, under the influence of drugs such as cocaine, occasionally turn heterosexuals into homosexuals, is an even more sinister development.
That long-term pornography use, accompanied by compulsive masturbation, actually causes structural changes in the brain is now beyond dispute. Whether this amounts to “brain damage” in the classic sense is a contentious issue and will be hotly denied by the Masturbation Lobby and all those who believe, erroneously, that masturbation is a stress reliever and a cure for depression.
Porn addiction and its invariable accompaniment, compulsive masturbation, are in fact stress increasers. They are often found as major symptoms in obsessive-compulsive disorders. Far from relieving depression, they intensify it. Indeed, they are all too often the underlying cause of the depression in that they generate a huge loss of self-esteem. These are truisms, patently obvious to all except the merchants of lies.
Meanwhile, there is little doubt that the virulent sex epidemic we witness all around us is a deliberately planned sex psyop. This is what governments want. The Puppet Masters who pull the hidden strings of our Western regimes, all masquerading as democracies, have managed to manufacture exactly what we see when we look around us: widespread neurosis, mass misery, the collapse of moral values, Christianity in ruins, and the coarse brutalization of the common man.
No need for gulags for those who consent to their own chains.
Are they putting something in the drinking water? I wouldn’t be surprised.
Lost in all the hoopla surrounding Michael Wolff’s anti-Trump book ‘Fire and Fury’ is another book detailing the well known sexual exploits of former POTUS Bill Clinton, and the effects Bill’s sexual appetite had on the safety of the men and women sworn to protect him.
According to a former agent assigned to Bill Clinton’s detail, the former POTUS endangered the lives of Secret Service agents because of his obsession with his mistresses.
In an explosive new tell-all book published by former Secret Service Uniform Division Officer Gary J. Byrne, a UD Officer was nearly killed in a car accident one night as Bill Clinton tried to sneak over to a ‘lady friend’s’ house.
Bill Clinton was so sex crazed that he got caught sneaking out of the White House one night with a raincoat over his head. This freak almost made it into the White House again. Let that sink in.
Byrne was assigned to Bill Clinton’s detail and served in federal law enforcement for almost 30 years.
During one of these rendezvous, a Secret Service officer dubbed “Reverend” hurried to run a red light in order to keep up with Bill Clinton’s car and an oncoming vehicle t-boned him leaving him with a grave head injury.
Bill Clinton and the other agents left the scene of the crash and left the DC police to handle the accident. The police had no idea the president of the United States was slithering around town incognito for sex romps.
Even more egregious, the gravely injured officer had to fight for his medical bills to be paid.
Via the Washington Examiner…
Afterward, according to the book, the agency tried to block payments to “Reverend” until he threatened to go to court where the details would be revealed. Still, the affair cut into the agency’s morale. Wrote Byrne in the book provided to Secrets:
“Word of what had happened to Reverend spread like wildfire through the Uniformed Division because any UD officer could have been in Reverend’s place. And although many would take a bullet for the president, what was the risk for? Were Clinton’s sordid personal affairs worth an officer’s life? Was that the duty we had signed up for, the reason we spent so much time away from our families?”
The Washington Examiner reports that Bill Clinton snuck out of the White House one night with a raincoat over his head. He was caught at the gate as he was on his way to visit one of his mistresses:
Byrne quotes the unnamed officer’s call for help: “You better get me some help up here. I just caught Bruce Lindsey trying to drive out West Exec. with the president with a raincoat over his head.”
He also said that the service was angered with Clinton’s antics and efforts to skip out unnoticed. But in the end, they agreed to “off the record” trips in small motorcades, wrote Byrne.
“Another tale that was kept from the public would have surely been called ‘Ringgate’ had the media caught wind of it. The president was in a major metropolitan airport, en route to Air Force One, when he realized he had left his wedding ring at his hotel. He ordered the motorcade to turn around so he could retrieve it. He was especially concerned about being seen arriving or boarding without his wedding ring as he had been traveling without the first lady.”
“Russia is an incomparably fascinating, deep, wonderful civilization, one of the great world civilizations, with a fantastic wealth of ideas, culture, and Christian spirituality. The truth is that it is, and was, routinely smeared by its enemies, and its true nature is barely understood in the West.”
JEA: Let’s start with your book, Putin’s Praetorians: Confessions of the Top Kremlin Trolls. In a chapter written by Charles Bausman, it states:
“Russia is an incomparably fascinating, deep, wonderful civilization, one of the great world civilizations, with a fantastic wealth of ideas, culture, and Christian spirituality. The truth is that it is, and was, routinely smeared by its enemies, and its true nature is barely understood in the West.”
Can you put some flesh in the bone of that statement for us?
PB: Charles has studied many years to gain a scholarly understanding of Russia and her culture. History verifies his apt reflections here, and I can only add this. Most people do not understand that Russia is still a vast empire in the geographic, cultural, and strategic sense. Like all great empires/civilizations she is also under constant internal and external stress, and subject to various expansion and contraction fluctuations.
It is because Russia is an empire, and because of the existent potential, that nations like Britain and the United States have sought to “contain” her. And since the fall of the Soviet Union the mission of the liberal order in the west has been to break up what remains of this empire.
JEA: Bausman again states:
“It is fair to say that the average Westerner, even the average highly-educated one, has a very faulty and slanted knowledge of Russia, tainted as it has been now for three centuries of outright hostility. I see it again and again when talking to highly educated and fair-minded people, especially older ones.”
Why is that? Would you attribute this to media disinformation?
Phil Butler
PB: The media and information “bubble” that westerners live under is not an overnight construct. The “reality” created for the public is not simply a newspaper, radio or TV fabrication, either. Even at the local level, in the church or at the factory, the idea of exceptionalism permeates western societies.
It is the essence of this false exceptionalism that powers what you would call Russophobia. The same modus also powers ultra-capitalism and the unsustainable democracies we’ve created.
JEA: Bausman: “Perhaps we are on the cusp of a new era, when observers can write and think about Russia with a new eye, and begin to understand her majesty and promise, as Russia is only now beginning to do herself. She truly has much to offer the world, in knowledge, wisdom, and spirituality…”
One of the most cogent scholars who has been doing exactly that for the past ten years or so is Stephen F. Cohen. Yet he has been deliberately demonized as an intellectual outcast and the Kremlin’s puppet. Is the West ready to accept the truth about Russia?
PB: People in the west cannot deconstruct their existence so easily. The tidy, quaint, and safe little walled garden in which we Americans have lived for decades is the reality. People like the so-called “Kremlin trolls” in this book are so misunderstood. I can tell you that each of them has gone through this “deconstruct” in order to be able to see the truth of these matters. I know Charles Bausman has. I imagine that Stephen Cohen has. And I know for certain that I have.
For the west to embrace Russia as a friend and partner a transition is necessary. We saw this modern transition come to a halt when the hegemony began regime change in Libya, Ukraine, and then Syria. We saw the “preparation” for normality destroyed when the Sochi Olympics were trashed by the liberal world order in February 2014.
JEA: Have you stumbled upon the writing of Masha Gessen? She is one of the most dishonest people I have ever encountered when it comes to Russia. She also cannot put two coherent thoughts together. I have discussed some of her writings in the past.
PB: I wrote a story about Gessen, which is about to be published. Ordinarily, I shun harsh personal criticisms of such individuals, but this woman is an especially onerous and dangerous case. Suffice it to say she is “damaged goods”, or someone a psychologist might refer to as irrational or “unbalanced” – I would not consider anything she says credible.
Gessen’s agenda is entirely wrapped around her gayness and the LGBT empowerment agenda. Like the ousted Russia oligarchs, the western hegemons see her influence in this community as a weapon. This is the open book of Masha Gessen.
JEA: You are absolutely right on target here. What frustrates me most about these issues is that these people don’t seem to understand elementary logic. Let me give you one example. Gessen once posited the claim that “It’s a no brainer that gays have the right to marry.” In the very next breath, she magically asserted: “I also think equally that the institution of marriage should not exist.”
So, which is it? She found herself in a torrent of contradictions because she is operating under a wicked ideology which doesn’t allow her to clear her head. What’s your take here?
BP: Once again, if you examine Gessen’s narrative with an open mind you see she is one big contradiction. The woman has an identity crisis, a loyalty crisis, a sexual identity crisis, and a paranoid delusion the mainstream liberal media broadcasts like an air raid siren.
Gessen is presented as a “New Russia” authority on comedy shows, at the Council of Foreign Relations, on PBS, in the New York Times, as if she is the great Karnak of soothsaying Russia experts. She is actually nothing of the kind. She is a tool with a mission to help destroy the traditional values of Russia, and to assist in the completed destruction of western traditions such as the institution of marriage. Anyone who cannot see this is in danger of becoming damaged goods just like Gessen. This is my honest take.
JEA: I again completely agree with you here. I remember how she intellectually humiliated herself when she hopelessly tried to defend the Pussy Riot, the Trotskyite group whose purpose was to desensitize Russia. We’ll probably discuss this later, when your article on Gessen is published.
Thanks to Donald Trump and Alabama judge Roy Moore, men in power nationwide suddenly find themselves besieged by accusations of sexual misconduct including rape and pedophilia. No one should be surprised. The same year Assistant District Attorney Roy Moore was reportedly forcing himself on 16-year-old Beverly Nelson, a book-length psychiatric study revealed in detail the abusive sexual habits of men in power, especially those in politics. There’s no reason to think men in power are any different today than they were back then, in 1977.
Here’s what the study found:
Many politicians have an exaggerated drive for sexual dominance. To compensate, they are much more likely than ordinary men to visit prostitutes, and to do so much more often, averaging 2 or 3 times per week. This reflects “a psychic structure which generates extreme sexual needs that seem to be basic to the power drive itself.”
Furthermore, few politicians visit prostitutes for straight sex: “the vast majority” of them are seeking “kinky sex,” which the 1977 study defined to include exhibitionism, voyeurism, cross-dressing, fetishism, threesomes, golden showers, humiliation, bondage, and flagellation. “By far the most common service politicians demand from call girls is to be beaten,” the study reported. Most politicians prefer sex that is sadomasochistic in nature, involving bondage, “discipline,” humiliation and pain. As one prostitute reported, “Sometimes it is hard to think of things that will hurt them badly enough to keep them happy.” The study offered an elaborate Freudian explanation for this weird behavior.
A Sexual Profile of Men in Power
The study, A Sexual Profile of Men in Power, was carried out over a seven-year period by Sam Janus, Ph.D., and Barbara Bess, M.D., both at that time members of the psychiatry faculty of New York Medical College. Between 1969 and 1976 they conducted lengthy and repeated interviews with 80 sex workers (68 elite call girls and 12 madams), gathering reports about 7,645 “johns” or clients, 60% of whom were politicians. In addition, they conducted another 300 hours of interviews with 10 legislative aides, 10 secretaries, and 10 research assistants on Capitol Hill in Washington or in state legislatures. {pg. xviii} When gathering data on politicians’ specific sexual preferences, each story was confirmed in detail by at least two other unrelated sources.
The published report is based on data from 773,920 separate visits to prostitutes by judges, mayors, governors, congressmen, senators, district attorneys, assistant district attorneys, city councilmen, and aldermen, but the statistical analysis was limited to members of the U.S. Congress.
The study concluded that politicians “are motivated simultaneously by the highest ideals, and by the most primitive need to prove their mightiness by imposing their will on others.” The politician “presents a clinical picture of an obsessive striving for power and control, to which he has subordinated every other aspect of life and sacrificed all human relationships.”
An insatiable need to control and dominate
Politicians — at least the ones who visit prostitutes — are “narcissistically vain” and are “compulsive risk takers” because “the arrogance of power wraps these men in an illusion of invulnerability.” In addition, they are “incapable of publicly admitting to error.” “The politician needs to win… not only for the intoxication of victory in a hard-fought battle, but because he has a compelling drive to dominate.” “It is very common among men who reach high office to speak of themselves as singled out by a supernatural agency to fulfill the will of God,” the study noted. Some of those who stay in office long enough to gain seniority, and thus unusual power, “have virtually abnegated their humanity in the relentless, all-consuming, and insatiable need to control and dominate.”
Once he reaches a position of power, an elected official gains “many privileges which are denied the lower and middle classes but traditionally have been enjoyed by the aristocracy…. He quickly becomes accustomed to the privileges of the class he now belongs to, and begins to take it for granted that if he wants them, women will be made available to him to use pretty much as he pleases.”
Sex lubricates the wheels of legislation
“The multitude of lobbyists and influence peddlers who understand very well that sex is the emollient which lubricates the wheels of legislation also see to it that these gatherings [receptions, business lunches, cocktail parties, and official dinners] always include a generous sprinkling of compliant single girls, professional prostitutes, or secretaries and aides who have retained a semi-amateur status.” So, “Very soon [the politician] comes to regard access to quantities of available young women as one of the many fringe benefits that naturally accompany his exalted position.”
The most notorious womanizers are the most hostile to women
Many men in power are deeply conflicted in their feelings toward women. On the one hand, they want to dominate, use, and abuse them; on the other hand, they want them held sacred on a pedestal. The study examined the voting records of 48 men in Congress “who have wide reputations as ‘womanizers,’” finding that – far more than the average politician – they are hostile to women. Ninety-two percent of notorious womanizers opposed abortion, expressing a “strongly punitive attitude toward women’s sexuality.” The “most notorious womanizers, not to say whoremongers, are the most narrowly repressive,” the study found.
The study reported some pretty bizarre behavior among men in Congress: one politician “has a woman come to his office and torture him while he makes business phone calls.” And: “the chairman of a committee of the United States Senate regularly has himself bound against a wall and subjected to mock crucifixion.” And: “Another senator has to have ‘surgery’ performed on him with kitchen knives.” (These men are trying to convince themselves how much stronger they are than ordinary humans.) Most bizarre of all, one congressman asked a prostitute to “kill a cat, skin it in front of him, and let the blood drip all over his body.” She refused.
In 1977, the authors wrote, “We were totally unprepared for the startling results” of their study. Today, on the other hand, no one should be surprised when politicians — and other men in power — assume they have a right to use and abuse women. Power itself drives men to take advantage of subordinates, and the urges for power and sexual dominance are inseparable.
What is to be done?
The saving grace in all this will be the rise of many more women into positions of countervailing power. In 1976-77 there were only 18 women (3%) serving in Congress; presently there are 105, which is 20%. Thanks to reports of sexual abuse by President Trump, former President William Clinton, Alabama Judge Roy Moore, and many other prominent politicians, aggressive nationwide campaigns are now under way to increase female representation at all levels of government. As these campaigns coordinate and come together, they will surely succeed. Slowly the abuse of women, at least in Congress, will likely diminish. Until then constant vigilance and zero silence are in order. If we abandon our illusions about men in power and act accordingly, we can avoid many future unpleasant surprises.
If you walk into the film industry and start interviewing people like Eli Roth, you will almost certainly hear incredible and bizarre things. Roth would tell you that he aspires to “fu$k up an entire generation”[1] through movies.
Roth and his brethren have been in the business for years, so they know the drill. Roth probably knows the story of Samson and Delilah. He probably knows that Samson’s lust darkened his mind and eventually sent him to his death.[2]
Roth almost certainly knows that the best way to destroy the morals of his audience is to prey on their lust and appetite. That is why Roth’s brethren have spent years fighting against obscenity laws and pornography in the United States.[3]
As Jewish scholar Nathan Abrams himself puts it,
“Older generation of Jewish filmmakers and actors, here [Woody] Allen, [Stanley] Kubrick and [Ron] Jeremy, arguably not only increased the Jewishness of their work, but updated it to match the new post-1990 sensibility by defining it in increasingly sexualized (and pornographic) terms.”[4]
Abrams declared elsewhere that “Jewish involvement in porn” is actually “is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.”[5]
Another Jewish scholar by the name of Josh Lambert tells us that people like Larry David and Sarah Silverman “are challenging America’s powerful religious, family-friendly culture and asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity.”[6]
Yet David and Silverman are hardly the only people who are “glorifying obscenity” in Hollywood. David Cronenberg obviously beat them to the punch. Cronenberg got to the heart of the matter years ago by laying out his ideological weltanschauung in an interview with the Rolling Stone this way:
“Nothing is true. It’s not an absolute. It’s only a human construct, very definitely able to change and susceptible to change and rethinking. And you can then be free. Free to be unethical, immoral, out of society and agent for some other power, never belonging.
“Ultimately, if you are an existentialist and you don’t believe in God and the judgment after death, then you can do anything you want: You can kill, you can do whatever society considers the most taboo thing.”[7]
Cronenberg’s moral calculus here is logically and philosophically incoherent. If “nothing is true,” then Cronenberg’s statement that “nothing is true” is not true. In order for the statement to make sense, Cronenberg has to assume that it is true! And if it is true, then the “nothing is true” is categorically false, which means that his entire argument collapses.
In short, Cronenberg is positing truth claims while denying truth exists! He is trapped in his own ideological matrix.[8]
Living the incoherency of his system aside, Cronenberg is basically saying that you can only be free if you can come to the conclusion that nothing is true and that morality is, as philosopher Michael Ruse believes, “flimflam.”[9] But because he is morally and intellectually blind, Cronenberg could not realize that his axiom is self-defeating.
Morality, as we all know, is inexorably linked to practical reason. It is also essential to esthetic truth and intellectual pursuit and honesty. As E. Michael Jones rightly puts it,
“The intellectual life is a function of the moral life of the thinker. In order to apprehend truth, which is the goal of the intellectual life, one must live a moral life. One can produce intellectual product, but to the extent that one prescinds from living the moral life, that product will be more a function of internal desire—wish fulfilment, if you will—than external reality. This is true of any intellectual field and any deeply held desire.”[10]
Truth, as Plato puts it, is like seeing things the way they really are.[11] And practical reason (another word for morality) is one of the main tools for discovering metaphysical truth.
Yet since Cronenberg dismisses practical reason in his ideological calculus, there was no way for him to make a logical point without falling into his own trap. In the process, he has become a monster, as one scholar has argued.[12]
The Rolling Stone interviewer asked, “Does the artist have any moral or social responsibility?” Cronenberg:
“No…Your responsibility is to be irresponsible. As soon as you talk about social or political responsibility, you’ve amputated the best limbs you’ve got as an artist. You are plugging into a very restrictive system that is going to push and pull and mold you and is going to make your art totally useless and ineffective.”[13]
Cronenberg’s philosophy, scholar William Beard tells us, is “the disappearance of ethics.”[14] It is actually “a world of unimpeded desires without consequences, where ‘everything is permitted.’ Metaphorically, this is the world of violent video games, of indulgent Hollywood movies, and also of the transgressive, boundary-piercing cinema of David Cronenberg.”[15]
No responsibility, no morality, no ethical values, and no limit, nothing but ultimate meaninglessness and existential hell in movies. Existence itself, as indicated in Cronenberg’s movie eXistenZ, means corruption, moral degradation, and ultimately pathetic death. The axiom of eXistenZ is that “nothing is true; everything is permitted.”[16]
“Every time I kill someone in my movie,” says Cronenberg, “I’m rehearsing my own death…It’s an existential truth, it’s very raw and real.” Didn’t Cronenberg state that nothing was true? Why is he now smuggling in truth in his philosophical trap?
Cronenberg, who has a “historic affinity with existentialism,”[17] is also playing with the lives of his viewers. He admits that eXistenZ is filled with “existential propaganda.”[18] Scholar William Beard comments:
“The disappearance of stable theoretical foundations for human society and human values, the stark realization of the insignificant position of humanity in a material cosmos, the undermining of all kinds of knowledge about the world and ourselves, leaves the existential human subject without clear guideline for living, with no certainty of anything but his or her own death…Culture, science, the whole edifice of modern European civilization are ineffectual in addressing the individual’s desperate plight.”[19]
Once the existentialist denies metaphysical truth, he has to start creating his own “truth”: “From this we must create ourselves as meaningful beings, and create the world as meaningful for ourselves. From this we must build up the new foundations of our own lives, adding other people, culture, history, and politics tentatively and fragmentedly as necessary…”[20]
Existentialists like Cronenberg, says Beard, “cut individuals off from the fundamental questions of personal existence, and leave them alienated in a world crowded with facts but void of meaning.”[21] The philosophy of existentialism teaches Cronenberg that people “are all doomed to die and be swallowed up by Nothingness, but along the way we may carve out a niche or ledge on the cliff…”[22]
Therefore “science” and technology are meaningful if they can advance sexual desires and appetite.[23] It was no coincidence that Cronenberg has seized technology in the information age to advance his appetite to a wider audience. He bragged that “technology is with us,”[24] meaning that he can use that kind of medium to get his essentially Freudian and therefore Talmudic ideas to unsuspecting viewers.
Put simply, Cronenberg is indirectly reinventing what Nietzsche would have called the transvaluation of all values, which again states that morality is an illusion and that any culture which becomes docile to the moral order must be overthrown.
But in order to do that, Cronenberg has to go back to his revolutionary roots, which is neither Western nor rational but essentially Talmudic or Freudian: “I think we start off with what Freud called a polymorphous perverseness.”[25]
One can easily argue that this “polymorphous perverseness” is at the core of virtually every Cronenberg film. In fact, Cronenberg admitted that characters in movies like Crash, M. Butterfly, Naked Lunch, Dead Ringers, and Sterero, were “reinventing sexuality,”[26] which is another way of saying that Cronenberg’s characters were subverting the sexual order.[27] Cronenberg’s existential philosophy, Beard says, is
“sexual or predatory, a drive, an appetite, that invokes Freud far more readily than the Sartre who heatedly rejected a Freudian view of life in which individuals were unfree prisoners of their psychic histories and hardwired desires.”[28]
Cronenberg’s characters in eXistenZ, Beard continues,
“seem to reproduce that quasi-Freudian sense that their individual freedom—a sacrosanct item of the existentialist creed—is compromised by appetites that are so powerful they are strongly impelled to do something ethically ugly. This happens to Pikul in the Chinese restaurant. He finds he wants to kill the waiter, and is told by Geller that the impulse is part of his game character’s make-up and that he won’t be able to do anything to stop it.”[29]
David and Brandon Cronenberg
The interesting thing is that Cronenberg has successfully passed his essentially diabolical ideas to his son Brandon, who is now following the family tradition. That fact became quite obvious when David edited Brandon’s first feature film Antiviral,[30] which the Rolling Stone itself has described as “sickening,” and which has the same “disturbing obsession with bodies and technology that animates his father’s films, from The Fly and Dead Ringers to Videodrome and Existenz.”[31] The Rolling Stone reported,
“The son was infected with his father’s own sense of cerebral horror, and he is not rebelling against it. ‘I wrestled with it at first,’ he says, ‘but you get affected by how you grow up….’”[32]
Cronenberg, whether he likes it or not, should be called a Satanist precisely because he is anti-Logos.[33] But there is a bigger picture here. Cronenberg’s ideology has been transported to places like Japan as well. For example, one of Japan’s most controversial filmmakers is none other than Takashi Miike.
Miike says that he is a fervent admirer of directors like David Lynch (Lost Highway), Paul Verhoeven (Basic Instinct), and of course David Cronenberg. These people are what one should call cultural subverters. Verhoeven meant it when he said:
“As a director, my goal is to be completely open. Just look at how I portray sex in my films. They’re considered shocking and obscene because I like to carefully examine human sexuality. It has to be realistic.”[34]
Verhoeven also declares that he has been “fascinated by the occult: black magic, UFOs, and kinetic energy. I also experimented with hypnotism, trying to get my friends to remember former lives.”[35] It was a natural step for Verhoeven to move from an interest in the occult to bringing his viewpoint to life in films. Turning from the unknown and unknowable, Verhoeven replaced his own ideology with reality:
“My films became my anchor to reality, and I began to make extremely realistic movies. I felt compelled to show things as explicitly as possible—a tendency which many film critics have dismissed as banal.”[36]
Verhoeven applied this tendency most often to the area of sexuality, explicitly portraying sex in movies like Showgirls, Basic Instinct, Turkish Delight, and The Fourth Man. Yet even in RoboCop, which in comparison has little sexuality, Verhoeven’s worldview is clear—this time he is substituting Logos incarnate with his own imagination:
“It’s pure resurrection. For me, RoboCop is a Cytale. First, Murphy is gunned down in the most horrific way: that is the Crucifixion. And it has to be so violent, because the audience has to remember him.
“Before that, he has not done anything in the film. He comes to the police station to put on his uniform, then he goes after the villains with his partner, and bang! he is dead. That shooting is the only thing about him—I did that deliberately.
“Next, the film makes a steep descent into the finite, after which he experiences his Resurrection, in a modern day…RoboCop is a Jesus figure—an American Jesus…Americans want to be humane, but if they think it takes too long, Christian morality is pushed aside for the moment and they go for their weapons—just like Robocop.”[37]
Biographer Rob van Scheers writes,
“Both in his films and in his personal life, Paul Verhoeven has always practiced a free sexual morality of which he makes no secret…Verhoeven would add in the gay magazine The Advocate: ‘Sex is a form of play—doing what you did when you were four or five years old and were playing in the street with your friends. Once you are grown up, it is difficult to be playful, but one of the ways you can is with sex. It is a way of showing yourself: That’s how I’m made. This is what I like.”[38]
Takashi Miike and Eli roth
In short, Verhoeven and Takashi Miike are on the same subversive boat. Both individuals want to overthrow the moral order. Eli Roth and Takashi Miike are also on the same boat, working to “fu$k an entire generation.” Of course, Roth himself admitted that he admires Miike’s work. In fact, Roth would have loved to make Ichi the Killer 2. Keep in mind that Ichi the Killer is one of Miike’s “most controversial films,” an “ultra-violent” film which portrays “sadomasochistic” scenes.
Miike admits in an interview with the BBC that he is a “feminist,” so it was inevitable that he would pull this ideology out of his film. “Miike has garnered international notoriety for depicting shocking scenes of extreme violence and sexual perversions…” Of course, this is exactly what Eli Roth and David Cronenberg have been doing for years.
What we are seeing here is that Hollywood stirred the subversive pot, and other nations such as Japan and South Korea followed suit. Even the new South Korean movie, Train to Busan, “borrows heavily from World War Z in its depiction of the fast-moving undead masses while also boasting an emotional core the Brad Pitt-starring extravaganza often lacked.”[39]
If no social progress is possible outside the moral order, then Satanists in Hollywood are contributing to the demise of social docility and cultural harmony around the world. The solution?
A return to practical reason and metaphysical Logos, the essence of true creativity and beauty. Movies such as The Lord of the Rings were written under those premises. As Israel Shamir rightly points out, Logos is “the main fountain of creativity.” Shamir also argues that true visual art or poetry simply cannot exist outside of Logos.[40]
If Satanists in Hollywood rejects “the main fountain of creativity,” then they can only produce degradation, ugliness, meaninglessness, despair, and ultimate chaos and confusion. It was only a matter of time before the art world was used as a weapon against Logos:
“A photograph of a crucifix in a container of urine, entitled Piss Christ, was exhibited in the Whitney Museum, which is headed by a great friend of [former Israeli Prime Minister] Ariel Sharon, a member of Mega, Leonard Lauder.”[41]
This is one reason why people like Carolee Scheemann use nothing but blatant sadistic/ sadomasochistic sexual imagery in their “art.”
[6] Josh Lambert, “‘Dirty Jews’ and the Christian Right,” Haaretz, February 3, 2014.
[7] David Breskin, “David Cronenberg: The Rolling Stone Interview,” Rolling Stone, February 6, 1992: 66-70.
[8] It is almost the same thing with relativism. I have been listening to an interview E. Michael Jones did with Alex Fontana during which Fontana declared that he doesn’t know if he agrees with “objective reality.” He then lays out his position by saying, “I guess I am a relativist.” I was completely stunned because during the entire interview Fontana was basically dissecting some ideas in the culture and implicitly arguing that they were wrong! Fontana could not see that there is no way to adjudicate two fundamentally opposite ideas if relativism is true. I was also shocked because relativism has been abandoned by serious thinkers years ago precisely because it is devoid of coherency and rigor. This is why Jones told him that relativism “is incoherent. It makes no sense ultimately.” I have discussed the incoherency of relativism in numerous articles. An example can be found here.
[9] Michael Ruse, “God is dead. Long live morality,” Guardian, March 15, 2010.
[10] E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns: Modernity as Rationalized Sexual Misbehavior (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2012), 15.
[11] Plato, The Republic (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 116.
[12] See for example William Beard, The Artist as Monster: The Cinema of David Cronenberg (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006).
[13] Breskin, “David Cronenberg: The Rolling Stone Interview,” Rolling Stone, February 6, 1992: 66-70.
[14] William Beard, The Artist as Monster: The Cinema of David Cronenberg (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006), 434.
[33] For a dissertation on this, see E. Michael Jones, “The Great Satan and Me: Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s Faustian Pact,” Culture Wars, July/August 2015.
[34] Rob van Scheers, Paul Verhoeven (London: Faber & Faber, 1997), 159-161.
[35] Paul Verhoeven, Jesus of Nazareth (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2010), xi, 5.
Before providing the gruesome details of the sadistic cruelties inflicted on sexually exploited children, many of them toddlers kidnapped from orphanages in Russia and tortured to death, it is necessary to set out the basic statistics: the principal facts and figures of the worldwide porn industry.
BEYOND THE PALE
“This is a sick world we are living in.” — Dr William Pierce (in video below)
These notes come from an unpublished article of mine written a few years ago which I have just found among my papers after misplacing them. I have updated the figures wherever possible, but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn they are in some cases an underestimate. This is because porn addiction sucks millions of new victims into its net every year. There were only 670 million internet users worldwide in 2002, for example, but by 2013 this figure had soared to 2.7 billion. (See here). In other words, the pool of potential victims of porn addiction has grown much larger with each passing year.
Most of the figures cited below, except those with separately numbered references within the text, are sourced from Family Safe Media’s Pornography Statistics. Otherwise, they will be found in Top Ten Reviews’ Internet Pornography Statistics.
Total world revenues per annum from pornography amount to $100 billion, with $3,100 spent on porn internationally every second. These revenues are larger than the revenues of the top technology companies combined: Microsoft, Google, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo, Apple, Netflix and EarthLink.
There are 7 billion people in the world spread over 200 countries. It would be of interest to know which countries are most given to porn consumption on a per capita basis. Given the inseparable link between pornography and masturbation, the citizens of those countries could then be justly regarded as the “most lustful in the world” — or, at any rate, as the world’s most prolific masturbators.
These are the top 10 countries most given to masturbatory lust, based on per capita expenditure on pornography: (1) South Korea ($527 per capita). (2) Japan ($157 pc). (3) Finland ($115 pc). (4) Australia ($99 pc). (5) Brazil ($53 pc), (6) Czech Republic ($44.9). (7) United States ($44.6 pc), (8) Taiwan ($43.4 pc), (9), U.K. ($32 pc). (10) Canada ($30 pc).
Why the South Koreans and Japanese spend such enormous amounts of money on porn, compared to other nations, is subject matter for a sensational PhD thesis which I hope some eager doctoral student will write one day. For 11 years in a row, South Korea has ranked at No. 1 in the suicide rate among OECD nations. Whether there is any correlation between high porn consumption and high suicide rates is a fascinating conundrum which academic researchers might wish to solve.
Though China spends more on porn than any other nation in the world (a whopping 28 percent of total pornography revenues compared to America’s 14 percent), this is only because of China’s enormous population of 1.3 billion people. In spite of the fact that porn is officially “illegal” in China, a country sometimes described as “a land where porn doesn’t exist”, the Chinese appear to have easy access to pornography imported from Japan.
The annual expenditure on pornography in two countries alone, China and Japan, would be enough to feed the world’s hungry for an entire year.
There are over 4 million porn websites in the world, growing by the thousands every day. There are 68 million pornographic search engine requests a day, 25 percent of the total. Four out of 10 internet users view porn sites regularly. There are 100,000 websites offering illegal child pornography. The largest consumers of internet porn, surprisingly, are children aged 11-17. There are 40 million regular users of porn in the US, and 20 percent of these are accustomed to peek at porn sites at work when they think no one is looking.
A new porn site is being created in the US every 40 minutes. The most expensive domain name ever purchased (site link deleted) cost $14 million: an indication of the enormous profits accruing to porn.
Roughly one in three visitors to porn sites are women, with almost one in six women (17 percent) admitting to a serious porn addiction. In the pre-internet age, women were relatively safe from the devastating effects of pornography. No longer. In the last three years alone, online porn viewership for women has quadrupled. It is a myth that women have different preferences to men and show less appetite for hardcore pornography.
A 2008 study found that women showed signs of arousal watching pretty much anything: masturbation, straight sex, girl-on-girl, guy-on-guy, bonobo chimps, everything — everything except pictures of naked men, which did not float a woman’s boat.
Average age of the first internet exposure to pornography is 11 years old. 90 percent of 8-16-year-olds have viewed porn online, mostly while doing homework.
Over half of global child porn (55%) is produced in the US, mostly in the Los Angeles area. There are 100,000 websites offering illegal child porn. Annual child porn revenues range from a low of $3 billion to an unrealistically high $20 billion. Daily Gnutella “child pornography” requests are 116,000 and keep growing. Even more disturbingly, there is strong evidence that an addiction to “normal” adult pornography can lead in time to an appetite for child porn.
Between 2005 and 2009, there was a huge and unexplained 432 percent increase in child pornography use, taking this new sex plague to pandemic levels. [Link lost]
The top video porn producers are found in the US, with Brazil and the Netherlands coming in second and third. The top six US erotica cities are Los Angeles, Las Vegas, New York, Chicago, San Francisco and Miami.
The fully employed female porn star can earn $100k-300k a year, three times more than the average male porn star. The more unnatural the sex is, the higher the rates. An actress who gets $500 for a session of straight vaginal sex can demand $1000 for a session of anal sex and $2000 for “double anal sex”. Celebrity porn stars naturally get paid much more. (Link lost). A criminal pedophile willing to molest a child in front of a live webcam can earn $1000 a night.
The top ten countries most opposed to porn are the Islamic countries, viz., Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Bahrain, Egypt, UAE, Kuwait, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore.
Almost 90 percent of the world’s internet porn pages are produced in the US for distribution to other countries, so the US can be seen as the world’s premier sex emporium.
The big players in the porn distribution market are now the major corporations, and, ultimately, the fabulously rich and faceless executives who control them. These are Fortune 500 companies such as AOL Time-Warner, AT&T, and General Motors. Through their cable and satellite subsidiaries they have distributed, and continue to distribute, vast quantities of pornographic material worldwide.
The number of pornographic websites owned by American Jews is of course a closely guarded secret—this is one politically incorrect statistic Wikipedia is unlikely to supply—but it is common knowledge that Jews dominate the porn industry (See also here and here ). Indeed, it is also common knowledge that six Jewish-owned companies own 96 percent of the world’s media and that Big Media and Big Porn are interlocking and overlapping concerns.
— § —
The Jewish Role in Child Murder
and Snuff Pornography
If 55 percent of the world’s child pornography is produced in the US—according to the British charity National Children’s Homes—23 percent of the world’s child porn is produced in Russia. (Link suppressed)
Whether or not Russian child porn is dominated by Russian Jews remains a nebulous issue. There is a high probability that it is, given that there is substantial evidence of Russian Jewish involvement in sex trafficking, kidnapping, pedophilia, and even child murder in the production of snuff porn movies.
Let me now quote from a news report first published in October 2000. I will intersperse snippets of this report — “JEWISH GANGSTERS RAPED, KILLED CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS TWO ON FILM” — with comments on the same case by Dr William Pierce which you can listen to yourself in the video at the end of this article:
ROME, ITALY — Italian and Russian police, working together, broke up a ring of Jewish gangsters who had been involved in the manufacture of child rape and snuff pornography.
Three Russian Jews and eight Italian Jews were arrested after police discovered they had been kidnapping non-Jewish children between the ages of two and five years old from Russian orphanages, raping the children, and then murdering them on film.
Mostly non-Jewish customers, including 1700 nationwide, 600 in Italy, and an unknown number in the United States, paid as much as $20,000 per film to watch little children being raped and murdered.
Here is what Dr William Pierce has to say:
“I suggest that if you asked your favorite Jewish media boss why his report of the police raids in Italy and the arrest of the child pornographers in Moscow didn’t get more news coverage in the United States, he’ll tell you that such news would only generate hatred against the Jews. And you know, he’d be right.
“My view is that such people should SIMPLY BE KILLED ON THE SPOT whenever and wherever they are found. More than that, the people who promote and encourage the extreme individualist mindset through their control of the media SHOULD BE EXTERMINATED ROOT AND BRANCH AS A CLASS.”
Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11 million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives responsible, claiming they were spreading “blood libel.”
Though AP and Reuters both ran stories on the episode, US media conglomerates refused to carry the story on television news, saying that it would prejudice Americans against Jews.
Dr Pierce is naturally outraged at these dirty tricks to conceal from the public the heavy Jewish role in snuff porn pedophilia: the systematic torture and murder of little children by Jewish pornographers in order to sate the jaded appetites of sexual perverts in the West:
“If there’s any group of people on this planet who have valid reasons for hating the Jews, it’s the Russians…. The Jews bled Russia dry with 70 years of Marxist rule and and murdered tens of millions of Russians—the best Russians—in the Communist slave labor camps or in the basements of the secret police headquarters or beside the shooting pits in forests all over Russia and Ukraine.
They have forced thousands of the prettiest young Russian women into prostitution and slavery after the fall of Communism; and now they kidnap Russian children and rape and sexually torture them in front of a camera in order to make child porn for rich perverts in the West.”
(Video transcript)
Are people in the West aware of the Jewish role in producing the filthiest child porn imaginable?
With the full connivance of the American government, Jews pursue this foul trade in the San Fernando valley, California, otherwise known as “Porn Valley”. (See here). No, the public largely remains unaware of these iniquitous facts, for the simple reason that the media covers up the facts.
The situation in Russia is even more extreme, with the majority of Russians totally unaware of the historical crimes committed against them by Jews in the Communist era. Here is Dr Pierce’s incendiary comment, and we must make allowances for his white-hot anger:
The Jews are lucky they still control most of the television and other mass media in Russia—because if the Russian people ever are fully awakened to what the Jews are still doing to them, they will rise up and kill every Jew in Russia—every Jew—every Jew!—and they will be fully justified in doing so.
(Video transcript)
Whatever you do, don’t miss this electrifying video before it is banned.
She talked about her life having been sexually abused from before she could talk right through to adulthood.
An “owner” had control of her, and sold her to wealthy clients for sexual/sadistic abuse and torture.
People have had mixed reactions to this. A number of people seem to have taken Kendall’s story on board and believe her, and consider this information in light of several other stories that have brought to light the reality of organized sexual abuse.
Some people do not believe her, and are unwilling to entertain the possibility that organized groups with a lot of money could be engaged in such practices.
I completely get that. I don’t want it to be true either. My work with sexual abuse victims, however, has opened my eyes to a horrific reality that exists in our world — including in small, everyday communities in Western society, where people would never imagine this is happening.
I have met people who were prostituted by family members for money, trafficked through gangs, and abused by groups of trusted people.
For these women and men to even be sitting in front of me ready to talk, they have to have already (mostly) overcome the overwhelming fear that they will be found and killed for telling the truth about what happened to them.
Abuse like this is so incredibly horrifying to experience, that the shock of it alone can be enough to fear any possible repercussions for trying to get away or reach out for help once they are away from the abusers.
Many people who live through sexual /sadistic abuse cannot bring themselves to talk about what happened because they fear no-one would believe them.
How has this widespread problem existed in relative secrecy for so long?
I believe there are a few elements to this.
Physical Control by Perpetrators
Perpetrators go to great lengths to cover their tracks. This can mean ending someone’s life in some cases. Other sexual abuse victims can be kept in slavery and never given the opportunity to escape.
Mental Control by Perpetrators
For those for whom there may be a possibility of escape, perpetrators will use skilled manipulation to keep a victim terrified and under control.
People or animals may be killed in front of them, to demonstrate what will happen if they don’t comply or ever try to escape.
Other abusers who harm children who are still living in the community may make threats while carrying out the abuse, like:
“If you ever tell anyone, I will kill your Mother/baby brother/best friend,” or “If you try to talk about this, I will do to your little sister what I have been doing to you.”
Other manipulative words focus on the victim being the one who is to blame for the abuse. Some perpetrators tell the one they are abusing things like:
“You are dirty and this is your fault,” or “If you didn’t look like that I wouldn’t be doing this to you.”
In the case of Kendall, she was told “You were born for this purpose” and nothing in her life proved otherwise.
Manipulative words have the potential to sink in and become belief systems. Victims can feel either too afraid to talk because of what the abuser will do, or they can believe that it is their fault and no-one would offer them help anyway.
Abusers whose victims still live in the community have usually gone to great lengths to establish themselves in positions of authority and trust.
The perpetrators of abuse on these children are usually known to them or their family, but trusted because of the position they hold or their ability to manipulate the parents into believing they are good people.
This can make it even harder for victims to speak out, because people react with disbelief because it does not fit the picture they have built in their minds of the alleged perpetrator.
The more well-established this positive picture is in people’s minds, the harder it is to get someone to believe that the perpetrator would actually do something like that (think Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris, and Bill Cosby).
A huge step for victims of sexual abuse is finally making the decision to reach out for help and speak to someone about what happened to them.
For some, this has happened after a big internal battle where part of their conditioning tells them they are worth nothing and they don’t deserve any help.
A small voice inside, however, is saying “No, it’s not okay for this to happen to anyone” and this is the voice I hope they listen to.
Failure to be Believed
Sexual abuse perpetrators and human traffickers know that most people are good, decent people, who would never dream of committing rape/sexual abuse, or sadistic torture.
They exploit this fact to the utmost degree. Many victims who have spoken out about being abused/trafficked/tortured have been met with utter disbelief.
It is so incredibly hard for a person to have lived through what a sexual abuse survivor has lived through, have fought a battle to find the courage to talk about it, only to be dismissed.
Why do good people sometimes fail to believe victims of sexual abuse?
For many people, it is actually too much to believe that this is happening, and happening to great numbers of people. Of course we all want there to be another explanation. But where are all these women and children who go missing every day? Where are they?
I have listened to people whose parents didn’t believe them ask me why. “Why didn’t they believe me?” It is such a heart-breaking question. One of the ways I have tried to make sense of it has been by looking inside myself.
There was a stage as a newly practicing therapist when I wasn’t sure I could do a job where my sole focus would be to work with people who had suffered sexual abuse.
I knew that I would have to be there with them, fully present and with an open heart, holding space and helping them work through the depths of their pain, and I didn’t know if I could do it.
What I have found through working in mental health is that sexual abuse is happening everywhere. People like me had to learn how to face our fear and help anyway, even if we thought we might cry. Because if not us, who? If not now, when?
This is why I think that people sometimes turn away from victims and do not believe them; because they are not ready to face that amount of pain. They are not ready to accept that humans do this to each other, or would do that to their own child.
Maybe they have no explanation for why humans do this to each other, so because they can’t rationally understand it, they reject it.
Maybe they are not ready to accept that we live in a world where this is happening every day, by people in all levels of society, because that is far too horrifying.
It is time for us all to realize that this is happening. Widespread sexual abuse and human trafficking is a reality in our world today.
To help the ones who need our help now, or may one day reach out to us, we as a collective need to learn how to face this painful truth, with all the emotion it brings up in us.
When we can turn toward our own painful emotional reactions with acceptance and compassion, we can begin to come to terms with what is happening.
Doing this helps us learn how to nurture ourselves with love through our own pain, and we then feel more compassion and empathy for those who are suffering around us. This is how we as humanity can come through this as a whole, in support of each other.
Putin has delivered a scathing speech, accusing western nations of “promot[ing] the propaganda of pedophilia” through eroding Christian objectives and moral ones too. The Russian President talks about moral decay in a system and normalizing behaviors that he sees as leading to “degradation and primitivization (of culture).”
“Without the moral values that are rooted in Christianity and other world religions, without rules and moral values which have formed and been developed over millennia, people will inevitably lose their human dignity,” Putin says.
“Christian Holidays and celebrations are abolished or ‘neutrally’ renamed, as if one were ashamed of those Christian holidays. With this method one hides away the deeper moral value of these celebrations.”
But it is the traditional notion of identity that concerns Putin. Traditional identity is being “denied or relativized” while new ideals are put forward. He questions the cost and accuses the West of placing Satan as an equal to God, and normalizing pedophilia through political correctness.
“The excesses and exaggerations of Political Correctness in these countries indeed leads to serious consideration for the legitimization of parties that promote the propaganda of pedophilia,” he said in the speech. “One has to respect the right of every minority to self-determination, but at the same time there cannot and must not be any doubt about the rights of the majority.”
The speech places the spotlight again on sex trafficking and pedophile rings. Only this month, western mainstream media ‘forgot’ to report on two very large international child trafficking rings busted. Government officials from India and Niger were involved, and possibly western elites, but the Mainstream Media chose to remain silent, begging the question why. This is one example of many where the West attempts to normalize or ignore pedophilia behaviors.
.
The corporate media’s push propels such agendas and Putin isn’t taking the matter lightly.
Only this year, a controversial bill was signed by Putin banning US citizens from adopting Russian children. Some critics say it was Putin’s way of fighting back at a new American law aimed at human rights abuses in Russia. But Putin maintains its aim was directed at the “out of control” pedophilia in the United States, particularly in Washington D.C.
Like most leaders, Putin is far from perfect. But technically he’s correct. How many times do you hear someone jump to the defense of a pedophile, claiming they’re just ‘sick in the head?’ This is a form of normalizing a behavior that a person has chosen to do. Laws are in place, laws are broken, child gets hurt. There is no excuse.
Putin talks about this moral erosion on an international scale too. The Red Scare is underway, but he questions why. Putin’s view is that Russia’s refusal to accept the US lead in transnationalism and thus surrender national autonomy, leads to the latest bogeyman persona the mainstream media have gifted him. It is the “moral crisis in the West” and its attempts to “remove institutions of international right and national sovereignty [via US Imperium]” for a more unified, unipolar world that create the morality problem.
Putin’s speech is not far-fetched, though granted, on face value appears this way. Any attempts to alienate an ideal or nation starts with the stripping back of morals surrounding it. Domestically, its pedophilia, religious intolerance, or the rationalizing of other similar behaviors once deemed unacceptable. According to Putin, it then stretches outward in the form of conflict to those defiant of the new objectives.
Russia faces a bombardment of western criticism. And some of it is well deserved. However, it is difficult to ignore the validity of normalizing behaviors once unacceptable, that are now harming others. Where do you draw the line?
According to Putin, it is impossible to move forward without “spiritual, cultural and national self-determination’”
Power is a disturbing documentary about a South African martial arts expert Debi Stevens and her efforts to fight India’s rape culture by teaching Indian girls to defend themselves. The film was produced following the 2012 gang rape and murder of a 23 year old physiotherapy intern on a Delhi bus.
In addition to showing excerpts from some of Stevens’s classes, Power provides disturbing insights into a cultural framework that makes it “okay” for 75% of India’s urban males population to sexually assault women. As in the Middle East, India’s extremely patriarchal and misogynist culture, combined with a large population of permanently unemployed males seems to set the stage for this kind of violence against women.
I found this film particularly instructive in view of recent publicity about migrants committing group sexual assaults in Cologne – in a variant of the Arab rape game Taharrush (see It’s an Arab rape game called Tarrarush).
Jyoti Singh‘s attackers were neither Arab nor Muslim but Hindu.
Did you know that British Prime Minister David Cameron is closely associated with Jewish pornographers and their families and that the entire British government is surrounded by a sickly aroma of smut and sleaze?
Based on this article by Guy Adams in the Daily Mail
Important note. This is an edited and abridged version of the above-mentioned article, with much added material in the form of pictures, captions and comments by Lasha Darkmoon. As such, in its present form, the article would never have been published in the Daily Mail.
SEX SHOP OWNER JACQUELINE GOLD WITH HER JEWISH PORN BARON FATHER DAVID GOLD
LD: The 55-year-old Ms Gold boasts, “I have empowered women in the bedroom,” referring to the sad fact that she has managed to persuade 2.5 million sexually frustrated British women to buy her company’s Rampant Rabbit vibrators each year, making her the 16th richest woman in Britain and a darling of the British political establishment.
Smiling for the camerasas she emerged from a silver Rolls-Royce, her diamond-encrusted necklace, handbag and watch twinkling under the flashbulbs, Jacqueline Gold made quite an entrance to the Conservative Party’s last Black And White Ball.
While many other wealthy guests scurried in through a side door, a few even shielding their faces in the process, she happily stopped and posed in a velvet dress for the paparazzi who had gathered on the pavement of London’s Park Lane, outside the exclusive Grosvenor House Hotel.
It was a very public show of support for a Tory party which had, just a month earlier, unveiled Ms Gold — who as chief executive of Ann Summers is best known for bringing the ‘Rampant Rabbit’ sex toy to Britain — as its latest glamorous celebrity supporter.
It was, perhaps, in return for her political support that British Prime Minister David Cameron personally invited Ms. Gold — who is worth a reputed £240 million ($355 million) — to sit at his right hand at February’s £1,500-a-ticket ball, at which a bronze bust of Margaret Thatcher sold for £210,000 and a shoe-shopping trip with Home Secretary Theresa May fetched a four-figure sum.
Joining her at the Prime Minister’s table were such tycoons as hedge fund manager Andrew Law and City tycoon Michael Spencer.
Quite a blue chip circle, one might observe, for a brassy female entrepreneur who grew rich bringing ‘Vibrating Nipple Clamps’, ‘Couples Vibrating Love Eggs’, and the ‘Divine Prostate Massager’ to the British High Street.
Not least since Ann Summers is still (according to its annual accounts) controlled by her father David, a pornographer whose stable of degrading magazines once included ‘Teenage Hardcore’, and whose titles advertised ‘barely legal young sweet p***y’.
The British Prime Minister was doubtless perfectly comfortable in Miss Gold’s company, however. For he appears to take a relaxed attitude towards her family’s line of business.
After all, it’s only two years since British Prime Minister David Cameron gave a Conservative peerage to Karren Brady, a longstanding protégée of David Gold’s business partner David Sullivan [another Jewish porn baron] — making her his official ‘Small Business Tsar’ in the process.
Back then, it was widely noted that the convent-educated Karren Brady, nowadays best known as a sidekick of Alan Sugar [yet another prominent Jewish entrepreneur] on The Apprentice, has a colourful past for a member of the British House of Lords.
She had, after all, begun her career in the Eighties as a director of Sullivan and Gold’s ‘boobs and bums’ premium sex lines, and of their smut-filled Sport newspapers.
PORNOGRAPHERS THREE
LASHA DARKMOON COMMENTS:
Karren Brady (right), was given a peerage by British PM David Cameron two years ago. She began her career in the 1980s working for Britain’s smut-filled tabloid the Sport newspaper, also promoting the ‘boobs and bum’ premium sex lines. David Sullivan (far left) and David Gold (centre), joint owners of a long list of porno magazines and the sleazy down-market Sport newspaper—running sex adds like this— were her proud Jewish employers. All these people have met and spoken with the British Prime Minister David Cameron and have helped, directly or indirectly, to steer the British government into a sordid cul de sac of dirty sex and sleaze.
For my part, I have nothing personal against David Cameron and regard him, warts and all, as infinitely preferable to the unconvicted war criminal Tony Blair. Blair, too, took money from pornographers and invited Jewish pornographer Richard Desmond, publisher of the Daily Express and Asian Babes—and with links to the New York mafia—to tea at Downing Street.
Here the allegedly devout Christian Blair, we are told, showed “a keen interest in his [Desmond’s] porn magazines“, asking him if “Forty Plus” referred to the age of the porn models or their breast size measurements. So much for the off-duty interests of Tony Blair—who once boasted to the Sun newspaper that he could easily have sex “five times a night”, if not more, and who reflected candidly on a sexual encounter with his wife Cherie on a London bus, “I was an animal following my instinct.”
Fast forward to last spring, and Jacqueline Gold’s journey to join Karren Brady at the heart of the Tory establishment was continuing apace. She campaigned vigorously for the Tories during both the election and the ensuing autumn conference season, when she hosted a fringe event addressed by Nicky Morgan, the Education Secretary and Minister for Women. That journey was then completed this week, in spectacular fashion, when the New Year’s Honours were announced: the 55-year-old Jacqueline Gold, [daughter of the sleazy Jewish porn magnate David Gold], was appointed a Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire.
On paper, this signal honour was granted for all the right reasons.
It did not, the announcement stressed, represent some form of payback for her recent decision to support David Cameron. Neither had it anything to do with a misguided notion that Britain should somehow celebrate the trade in sex toys, bondage gear and racy underwear that her 138 Ann Summers stores stock.
Instead, according to the official announcement, Jacqueline Gold was accorded the CBE — just one step down from a Damehood — for her ‘Service to Entrepreneurship, Women in Business and Social Enterprise.’
It should at this stage be stressed that during her 35-year career, Gold has undoubtedly contributed to all three spheres.
Ann Summers, which is based entirely on-shore, employs 10,000 people, including 7,000 female Ann Summers ‘party organisers’, who between them host around 4,000 Tupperware party-style events each week, becoming financially independent while they sell chocolate body paint, fluffy handcuffs, and battery-powered sex toys to guests.
The timing of the CBE, so soon after Jacqueline Gold chose to publicly support the Conservatives, will do nothing to blunt criticism that the British Honours system nowadays revolves around the most tawdry form of political patronage.
Whatever one’s views about all this, a more pertinent question thrown up by the honouring not just of Jacqueline Gold, but also of Karren Brady, is this: why, exactly, are David Cameron’s Tories choosing to get into bed with the protégées of two of Britain’s most notorious porn barons?
Karren Brady’s mentor David Sullivan, who in his Seventies heyday owned 139 sex shops, 20 magazines, 40 race horses and a number of massage parlours, used to boast that the material he peddled was ‘the strongest legally available’ in the UK.
In the spring of 1982, the self-styled ‘Prince of Porn’ was tried at Snaresbrook Crown Court on charges of living off immoral earnings; in other words, of being a pimp.
The alleged offences related to his two London massage parlours, where undercover policemen were offered sexual ‘extras’ by the ‘underpaid and exploited’ female staff who were offering ‘French and Continental’ — as sexual services were euphemistically termed — for £20.
Sullivan denied the charges but was found guilty and sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment. He served 71 days in Wormwood Scrubs and Ford Open Prison.
JEWISH PORNOGRAPHER DAVID SULLIVAN
WORTH $1.25 billion (2015)
With his partner, David Gold, Sullivan’s first business venture was selling soft pornography photos. They expanded into sex shops, adult magazines and several low-budget blue movies, making Sullivan a millionaire by the age of 25. By the late 1970s, he was in control of half of the adult magazine market, 80% of the adult mail order market, and 150 shops.
In 1982 Sullivan was convicted of living off immoral earnings and after a successful appeal was released after serving 71 days in prison. Sullivan explained that he did not feel embarrassed about the initial source of his early fortunes. “I’ve made a lot of people happy,” he said.
Ah yes, the Jews know how to make people “happy” all right. They are in the front rank of philanthropists and are always moved by the noblest and most altruistic sentiments. I have noted this curious phenomenon of “happiness-spreading” in my long 2-part article “Pornography’s Effect on the Brain”:
Perhaps the quickest way to tame and tranquilize an unruly nation is to turn its citizens into sex addicts: for just as children are easily taken in by predators who tempt them with candy, most people are only too pleased to live under governments that offer them the seductive pleasures of porn: that is to say, cheap and easy orgasms as substitutes for happiness. [LD]
Guy Adams continues:
Jacqueline Gold’s father David Gold (pictured), for his part, managed to stay on the correct side of the law throughout his career. But he nonetheless spent the Seventies being dragged in and out of court in deeply unseemly circumstances.
In 1971, he and his company were cleared at the Old Bailey of publishing obscene materials for gain. He was in the Central Criminal Court again in 1975, to defend himself in relation to 11,000 seized magazines dealing with bondage and flagellation. Gold was cleared once again, as he was in another obscenity case the following year.
Shortly before selling his pornographic titles, which he offloaded in 2007, just ahead of the growing popularity of internet smut causing the printed market to collapse, he said unapologetically: ‘I’m a top-shelf publisher. But that’s how I started out, that’s what I am. And I’m proud of everything I have done.’
Jacqueline Gold joined the family firm in the early Eighties, when she was recently out of school, and over the ensuing years, successfully turned David’s small string of Ann Summers sex shops, patronised by what she called the ‘dirty anorak brigade’ into a High Street chain popular with women, which last year turned over almost £105 million.
It was her idea to devote large areas of the stores to selling erotic lingerie, and novelty items such as edible nipple tassels (with sex toys confined to small sections of the shops), since it meant that they would no longer be officially classified as sex shops, which need to be licensed by local councils.
The brand’s success is, she argues, built on “good clean fun”. [LOL]. And it has been extremely profitable. In the heyday of the ‘Rampant Rabbit’, made famous by the TV show Sex And The City, she claimed that Ann Summers was selling 2.5 million vibrators in the UK each year. Each costs very little to make, but can retail for more than £50 ($75)
LD: The great British empire, a hundred years ago an Empire on which the sun never set, is now a sleazy masturbatorium built on millions of orgasms provided like tap water by degenerate Jews. This gives a new meaning to the phrase “good clean fun”.
The Jews have always been the cheerleaders of “sexual liberation” and have derived their inspiration from the Father of Jewish psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud, famous for saying: “Sexual morality seems to me very contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life.”
Few are aware that, while on board the ship taking him to America, Freud had turned to one of his disciples and remarked cynically: “If only the Americans knew, we are bringing them the plague!”
The plague is sexual demoralization and in particular pornography. The world’s $100 billion porn industry is known to be almost exclusively in Jewish hands: a weapon used to destroy traditional values and spread mass demoralization.
See my article Pornography as a Secret Weapon for further details, especially Section 1: “Jews use pornography ‘to destroy gentile morals’.” [LD]
Like Karren Brady, Jewish sex merchant Jacqueline Gold has rarely been made to discuss the issue of her father’s association with the porn trade.
Indeed, reporters who raise impertinent questions about Ann Summers, or ask whether its success might have contributed to the sexualisation of the High Street, are often treated to a lecture about how the stores empower or liberate women.
In 2005, on one of the only occasions an interviewer succeeded in getting her to address the issue of pornography, the encounter ‘turned a bit chilly’.
‘If you’re talking about hard-core pornography, like most people, I don’t want to see it in stores, or available,’ Gold said. ‘If you’re talking about soft porn, like top-shelf magazines, I personally don’t have a problem with that.’
Asked if she was a feminist, she responded: ‘In the popular sense of the word, no. But I believe in equality for women.’
The Honours committee appears to agree. As, we can only assume, does our Prime Minister.
So it goes that the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire has, like 140 of Britain’s High Streets, now been tarnished by association with Rampant Rabbits, Vibrating Love Eggs, and a family business built on ‘top-shelf’ smut.
The British Empire of Smut and Sleaze
where Jewish pornographers dine with politicians
and take tea at Downing Street with the Prime Minister
“This country is now led by a man whom many voters will forever believe or suspect once had sex with a dead pig.” — Daily Telegraph, here
Dear Swiss males, (It’s always males that exhibit such deviant behavior), what the hell is wrong with you? We liked you better when you were building cuckoo clocks.
Switzerland is seeing a worrying increase in the number of sex attacks carried out against animals and in particular horses. Figures showed cases of animal abuse rose to 1,709 in 2014, an increase of 1,542 from the previous 12 months.
The findings are worrying animal rights groups as it is a problem that seems to be getting worse. The foundation, known as Tier im Recht (Animals in Law), said the amount of abuse cases reported was triple compared to a decade ago.
However, it seems as though horses are coming under particular threat, with almost 10 percent of cases maltreatment of the animals involving bestiality.
“This rate is relatively elevated compared with other types of animals,” Andreas Ruttimann, a legal expert with Tier im Recht, told the Local.
“A total of 105 cases of animal cruelty to horses were registered last year, up considerably from previous years but probably below the actual number of incidents,” he added.
Worryingly, the group believes the actually figure could be much higher, given that around 150,000 people in Switzerland take part in equestrian activities. It also adds that there are more than 110,000 horses at 18,000 farms in the country.
The 20 Minuten newspaper reported that experts believe that as many as 10,000 people living in Switzerland are suspected of practicing zoophilia (sex with animals). Tier im Recht says the higher prosecution rates are down to tougher animal protection laws being introduced by the government, to protect their welfare.
Switzerland has a population of just over 8 million, meaning 0.125 percent of the population have a penchant for zoophilia.
“Our citizens should know the urgent facts…but they don’t because our media serves imperial, not popular interests. They lie, deceive, connive and suppress what everyone needs to know, substituting managed news misinformation and rubbish for hard truths…”—Oliver Stone
Tales from the Conspiratum 
