If you walk into the film industry and start interviewing people like Eli Roth, you will almost certainly hear incredible and bizarre things. Roth would tell you that he aspires to “fu$k up an entire generation” through movies.
Roth and his brethren have been in the business for years, so they know the drill. Roth probably knows the story of Samson and Delilah. He probably knows that Samson’s lust darkened his mind and eventually sent him to his death.
Roth almost certainly knows that the best way to destroy the morals of his audience is to prey on their lust and appetite. That is why Roth’s brethren have spent years fighting against obscenity laws and pornography in the United States.
As Jewish scholar Nathan Abrams himself puts it,
“Older generation of Jewish filmmakers and actors, here [Woody] Allen, [Stanley] Kubrick and [Ron] Jeremy, arguably not only increased the Jewishness of their work, but updated it to match the new post-1990 sensibility by defining it in increasingly sexualized (and pornographic) terms.”
Abrams declared elsewhere that “Jewish involvement in porn” is actually “is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.”
Another Jewish scholar by the name of Josh Lambert tells us that people like Larry David and Sarah Silverman “are challenging America’s powerful religious, family-friendly culture and asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity.”
Yet David and Silverman are hardly the only people who are “glorifying obscenity” in Hollywood. David Cronenberg obviously beat them to the punch. Cronenberg got to the heart of the matter years ago by laying out his ideological weltanschauung in an interview with the Rolling Stone this way:
“Nothing is true. It’s not an absolute. It’s only a human construct, very definitely able to change and susceptible to change and rethinking. And you can then be free. Free to be unethical, immoral, out of society and agent for some other power, never belonging.
“Ultimately, if you are an existentialist and you don’t believe in God and the judgment after death, then you can do anything you want: You can kill, you can do whatever society considers the most taboo thing.”
Cronenberg’s moral calculus here is logically and philosophically incoherent. If “nothing is true,” then Cronenberg’s statement that “nothing is true” is not true. In order for the statement to make sense, Cronenberg has to assume that it is true! And if it is true, then the “nothing is true” is categorically false, which means that his entire argument collapses.
In short, Cronenberg is positing truth claims while denying truth exists! He is trapped in his own ideological matrix.
Living the incoherency of his system aside, Cronenberg is basically saying that you can only be free if you can come to the conclusion that nothing is true and that morality is, as philosopher Michael Ruse believes, “flimflam.” But because he is morally and intellectually blind, Cronenberg could not realize that his axiom is self-defeating.
Morality, as we all know, is inexorably linked to practical reason. It is also essential to esthetic truth and intellectual pursuit and honesty. As E. Michael Jones rightly puts it,
“The intellectual life is a function of the moral life of the thinker. In order to apprehend truth, which is the goal of the intellectual life, one must live a moral life. One can produce intellectual product, but to the extent that one prescinds from living the moral life, that product will be more a function of internal desire—wish fulfilment, if you will—than external reality. This is true of any intellectual field and any deeply held desire.”
Truth, as Plato puts it, is like seeing things the way they really are. And practical reason (another word for morality) is one of the main tools for discovering metaphysical truth.
Yet since Cronenberg dismisses practical reason in his ideological calculus, there was no way for him to make a logical point without falling into his own trap. In the process, he has become a monster, as one scholar has argued.
The Rolling Stone interviewer asked, “Does the artist have any moral or social responsibility?” Cronenberg:
“No…Your responsibility is to be irresponsible. As soon as you talk about social or political responsibility, you’ve amputated the best limbs you’ve got as an artist. You are plugging into a very restrictive system that is going to push and pull and mold you and is going to make your art totally useless and ineffective.”
Cronenberg’s philosophy, scholar William Beard tells us, is “the disappearance of ethics.” It is actually “a world of unimpeded desires without consequences, where ‘everything is permitted.’ Metaphorically, this is the world of violent video games, of indulgent Hollywood movies, and also of the transgressive, boundary-piercing cinema of David Cronenberg.”
No responsibility, no morality, no ethical values, and no limit, nothing but ultimate meaninglessness and existential hell in movies. Existence itself, as indicated in Cronenberg’s movie eXistenZ, means corruption, moral degradation, and ultimately pathetic death. The axiom of eXistenZ is that “nothing is true; everything is permitted.”
“Every time I kill someone in my movie,” says Cronenberg, “I’m rehearsing my own death…It’s an existential truth, it’s very raw and real.” Didn’t Cronenberg state that nothing was true? Why is he now smuggling in truth in his philosophical trap?
Cronenberg, who has a “historic affinity with existentialism,” is also playing with the lives of his viewers. He admits that eXistenZ is filled with “existential propaganda.” Scholar William Beard comments:
“The disappearance of stable theoretical foundations for human society and human values, the stark realization of the insignificant position of humanity in a material cosmos, the undermining of all kinds of knowledge about the world and ourselves, leaves the existential human subject without clear guideline for living, with no certainty of anything but his or her own death…Culture, science, the whole edifice of modern European civilization are ineffectual in addressing the individual’s desperate plight.”
Once the existentialist denies metaphysical truth, he has to start creating his own “truth”: “From this we must create ourselves as meaningful beings, and create the world as meaningful for ourselves. From this we must build up the new foundations of our own lives, adding other people, culture, history, and politics tentatively and fragmentedly as necessary…”
Existentialists like Cronenberg, says Beard, “cut individuals off from the fundamental questions of personal existence, and leave them alienated in a world crowded with facts but void of meaning.” The philosophy of existentialism teaches Cronenberg that people “are all doomed to die and be swallowed up by Nothingness, but along the way we may carve out a niche or ledge on the cliff…”
Therefore “science” and technology are meaningful if they can advance sexual desires and appetite. It was no coincidence that Cronenberg has seized technology in the information age to advance his appetite to a wider audience. He bragged that “technology is with us,” meaning that he can use that kind of medium to get his essentially Freudian and therefore Talmudic ideas to unsuspecting viewers.
Put simply, Cronenberg is indirectly reinventing what Nietzsche would have called the transvaluation of all values, which again states that morality is an illusion and that any culture which becomes docile to the moral order must be overthrown.
But in order to do that, Cronenberg has to go back to his revolutionary roots, which is neither Western nor rational but essentially Talmudic or Freudian: “I think we start off with what Freud called a polymorphous perverseness.”
One can easily argue that this “polymorphous perverseness” is at the core of virtually every Cronenberg film. In fact, Cronenberg admitted that characters in movies like Crash, M. Butterfly, Naked Lunch, Dead Ringers, and Sterero, were “reinventing sexuality,” which is another way of saying that Cronenberg’s characters were subverting the sexual order. Cronenberg’s existential philosophy, Beard says, is
“sexual or predatory, a drive, an appetite, that invokes Freud far more readily than the Sartre who heatedly rejected a Freudian view of life in which individuals were unfree prisoners of their psychic histories and hardwired desires.”
Cronenberg’s characters in eXistenZ, Beard continues,
“seem to reproduce that quasi-Freudian sense that their individual freedom—a sacrosanct item of the existentialist creed—is compromised by appetites that are so powerful they are strongly impelled to do something ethically ugly. This happens to Pikul in the Chinese restaurant. He finds he wants to kill the waiter, and is told by Geller that the impulse is part of his game character’s make-up and that he won’t be able to do anything to stop it.”
The interesting thing is that Cronenberg has successfully passed his essentially diabolical ideas to his son Brandon, who is now following the family tradition. That fact became quite obvious when David edited Brandon’s first feature film Antiviral, which the Rolling Stone itself has described as “sickening,” and which has the same “disturbing obsession with bodies and technology that animates his father’s films, from The Fly and Dead Ringers to Videodrome and Existenz.” The Rolling Stone reported,
“The son was infected with his father’s own sense of cerebral horror, and he is not rebelling against it. ‘I wrestled with it at first,’ he says, ‘but you get affected by how you grow up….’”
Cronenberg, whether he likes it or not, should be called a Satanist precisely because he is anti-Logos. But there is a bigger picture here. Cronenberg’s ideology has been transported to places like Japan as well. For example, one of Japan’s most controversial filmmakers is none other than Takashi Miike.
Miike says that he is a fervent admirer of directors like David Lynch (Lost Highway), Paul Verhoeven (Basic Instinct), and of course David Cronenberg. These people are what one should call cultural subverters. Verhoeven meant it when he said:
“As a director, my goal is to be completely open. Just look at how I portray sex in my films. They’re considered shocking and obscene because I like to carefully examine human sexuality. It has to be realistic.”
Verhoeven also declares that he has been “fascinated by the occult: black magic, UFOs, and kinetic energy. I also experimented with hypnotism, trying to get my friends to remember former lives.” It was a natural step for Verhoeven to move from an interest in the occult to bringing his viewpoint to life in films. Turning from the unknown and unknowable, Verhoeven replaced his own ideology with reality:
“My films became my anchor to reality, and I began to make extremely realistic movies. I felt compelled to show things as explicitly as possible—a tendency which many film critics have dismissed as banal.”
Verhoeven applied this tendency most often to the area of sexuality, explicitly portraying sex in movies like Showgirls, Basic Instinct, Turkish Delight, and The Fourth Man. Yet even in RoboCop, which in comparison has little sexuality, Verhoeven’s worldview is clear—this time he is substituting Logos incarnate with his own imagination:
“It’s pure resurrection. For me, RoboCop is a Cytale. First, Murphy is gunned down in the most horrific way: that is the Crucifixion. And it has to be so violent, because the audience has to remember him.
“Before that, he has not done anything in the film. He comes to the police station to put on his uniform, then he goes after the villains with his partner, and bang! he is dead. That shooting is the only thing about him—I did that deliberately.
“Next, the film makes a steep descent into the finite, after which he experiences his Resurrection, in a modern day…RoboCop is a Jesus figure—an American Jesus…Americans want to be humane, but if they think it takes too long, Christian morality is pushed aside for the moment and they go for their weapons—just like Robocop.”
Biographer Rob van Scheers writes,
“Both in his films and in his personal life, Paul Verhoeven has always practiced a free sexual morality of which he makes no secret…Verhoeven would add in the gay magazine The Advocate: ‘Sex is a form of play—doing what you did when you were four or five years old and were playing in the street with your friends. Once you are grown up, it is difficult to be playful, but one of the ways you can is with sex. It is a way of showing yourself: That’s how I’m made. This is what I like.”
In short, Verhoeven and Takashi Miike are on the same subversive boat. Both individuals want to overthrow the moral order. Eli Roth and Takashi Miike are also on the same boat, working to “fu$k an entire generation.” Of course, Roth himself admitted that he admires Miike’s work. In fact, Roth would have loved to make Ichi the Killer 2. Keep in mind that Ichi the Killer is one of Miike’s “most controversial films,” an “ultra-violent” film which portrays “sadomasochistic” scenes.
Miike admits in an interview with the BBC that he is a “feminist,” so it was inevitable that he would pull this ideology out of his film. “Miike has garnered international notoriety for depicting shocking scenes of extreme violence and sexual perversions…” Of course, this is exactly what Eli Roth and David Cronenberg have been doing for years.
What we are seeing here is that Hollywood stirred the subversive pot, and other nations such as Japan and South Korea followed suit. Even the new South Korean movie, Train to Busan, “borrows heavily from World War Z in its depiction of the fast-moving undead masses while also boasting an emotional core the Brad Pitt-starring extravaganza often lacked.”
If no social progress is possible outside the moral order, then Satanists in Hollywood are contributing to the demise of social docility and cultural harmony around the world. The solution?
A return to practical reason and metaphysical Logos, the essence of true creativity and beauty. Movies such as The Lord of the Rings were written under those premises. As Israel Shamir rightly points out, Logos is “the main fountain of creativity.” Shamir also argues that true visual art or poetry simply cannot exist outside of Logos.
If Satanists in Hollywood rejects “the main fountain of creativity,” then they can only produce degradation, ugliness, meaninglessness, despair, and ultimate chaos and confusion. It was only a matter of time before the art world was used as a weapon against Logos:
“A photograph of a crucifix in a container of urine, entitled Piss Christ, was exhibited in the Whitney Museum, which is headed by a great friend of [former Israeli Prime Minister] Ariel Sharon, a member of Mega, Leonard Lauder.”
This is one reason why people like Carolee Scheemann use nothing but blatant sadistic/ sadomasochistic sexual imagery in their “art.”
 Quoted in Stuart Dredge, “Netflix series Hemlock Grove: ‘People want their horror horrific,’ says Eli Roth,” Guardian, April 10, 2013.
 See E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1054-1056.
 See Josh Lambert, Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2014).
 Nathan Abrams, The New Jew in Film: Exploring Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Cinema (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2012), 72.
 Nathan Abrams, “Triple-exthnics,” Jewish Quarterly, Winter 2004.
 Josh Lambert, “‘Dirty Jews’ and the Christian Right,” Haaretz, February 3, 2014.
 David Breskin, “David Cronenberg: The Rolling Stone Interview,” Rolling Stone, February 6, 1992: 66-70.
 It is almost the same thing with relativism. I have been listening to an interview E. Michael Jones did with Alex Fontana during which Fontana declared that he doesn’t know if he agrees with “objective reality.” He then lays out his position by saying, “I guess I am a relativist.” I was completely stunned because during the entire interview Fontana was basically dissecting some ideas in the culture and implicitly arguing that they were wrong! Fontana could not see that there is no way to adjudicate two fundamentally opposite ideas if relativism is true. I was also shocked because relativism has been abandoned by serious thinkers years ago precisely because it is devoid of coherency and rigor. This is why Jones told him that relativism “is incoherent. It makes no sense ultimately.” I have discussed the incoherency of relativism in numerous articles. An example can be found here.
 Michael Ruse, “God is dead. Long live morality,” Guardian, March 15, 2010.
 E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns: Modernity as Rationalized Sexual Misbehavior (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2012), 15.
 Plato, The Republic (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 116.
 See for example William Beard, The Artist as Monster: The Cinema of David Cronenberg (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006).
 Breskin, “David Cronenberg: The Rolling Stone Interview,” Rolling Stone, February 6, 1992: 66-70.
 William Beard, The Artist as Monster: The Cinema of David Cronenberg (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006), 434.
 Ibid., 443.
 Ibid., 434
 Ibid., 429.
 Ibid., 430.
 Ibid., 430-431.
 Ibid., 431.
 Ibid., 433.
 Ibid., 430.
 Ibid., 446.
 Breskin, “David Cronenberg: The Rolling Stone Interview,” Rolling Stone, February 6, 1992: 66-70.
 Beard, Artist as Monster, 452.
 Beard goes into great detail of this. See pages 452-453, 455-456.
 Beard, Artist as Monster, 433.
 Ibid., 434.
 Bruce Kirkland, “Brandon Cronenberg brings first feature film ‘Antiviral’ home,” Toronto Sun, September 9, 2012.
 Logan Hill, “’Antiviral’ Explores Sickness of Celebrity Culture,” Rolling Stone, April 10, 2013.
 For a dissertation on this, see E. Michael Jones, “The Great Satan and Me: Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s Faustian Pact,” Culture Wars, July/August 2015.
 Rob van Scheers, Paul Verhoeven (London: Faber & Faber, 1997), 159-161.
 Paul Verhoeven, Jesus of Nazareth (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2010), xi, 5.
 Ibid., 6.
 Van Scheers, Paul Verhoeven, 195.
 Ibid., 258.
 Clark Collis, “Train to Busan: EW review,” Entertainment Weekly, July 22, 2016.
 Israel Shamir, Cabbala of Power (Charleston, SC: BookSurge, 2007), 153.
 Ibid., 150.
With permission from
May 21, 2017
Before providing the gruesome details of the sadistic cruelties inflicted on sexually exploited children, many of them toddlers kidnapped from orphanages in Russia and tortured to death, it is necessary to set out the basic statistics: the principal facts and figures of the worldwide porn industry.
“This is a sick world we are living in.”
— Dr William Pierce (in video below)
These notes come from an unpublished article of mine written a few years ago which I have just found among my papers after misplacing them. I have updated the figures wherever possible, but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn they are in some cases an underestimate. This is because porn addiction sucks millions of new victims into its net every year. There were only 670 million internet users worldwide in 2002, for example, but by 2013 this figure had soared to 2.7 billion. (See here). In other words, the pool of potential victims of porn addiction has grown much larger with each passing year.
Most of the figures cited below, except those with separately numbered references within the text, are sourced from Family Safe Media’s Pornography Statistics. Otherwise, they will be found in Top Ten Reviews’ Internet Pornography Statistics.
Total world revenues per annum from pornography amount to $100 billion, with $3,100 spent on porn internationally every second. These revenues are larger than the revenues of the top technology companies combined: Microsoft, Google, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo, Apple, Netflix and EarthLink.
There are 7 billion people in the world spread over 200 countries. It would be of interest to know which countries are most given to porn consumption on a per capita basis. Given the inseparable link between pornography and masturbation, the citizens of those countries could then be justly regarded as the “most lustful in the world” — or, at any rate, as the world’s most prolific masturbators.
These are the top 10 countries most given to masturbatory lust, based on per capita expenditure on pornography: (1) South Korea ($527 per capita). (2) Japan ($157 pc). (3) Finland ($115 pc). (4) Australia ($99 pc). (5) Brazil ($53 pc), (6) Czech Republic ($44.9). (7) United States ($44.6 pc), (8) Taiwan ($43.4 pc), (9), U.K. ($32 pc). (10) Canada ($30 pc).
Why the South Koreans and Japanese spend such enormous amounts of money on porn, compared to other nations, is subject matter for a sensational PhD thesis which I hope some eager doctoral student will write one day. For 11 years in a row, South Korea has ranked at No. 1 in the suicide rate among OECD nations. Whether there is any correlation between high porn consumption and high suicide rates is a fascinating conundrum which academic researchers might wish to solve.
Though China spends more on porn than any other nation in the world (a whopping 28 percent of total pornography revenues compared to America’s 14 percent), this is only because of China’s enormous population of 1.3 billion people. In spite of the fact that porn is officially “illegal” in China, a country sometimes described as “a land where porn doesn’t exist”, the Chinese appear to have easy access to pornography imported from Japan.
The annual expenditure on pornography in two countries alone, China and Japan, would be enough to feed the world’s hungry for an entire year.
There are over 4 million porn websites in the world, growing by the thousands every day. There are 68 million pornographic search engine requests a day, 25 percent of the total. Four out of 10 internet users view porn sites regularly. There are 100,000 websites offering illegal child pornography. The largest consumers of internet porn, surprisingly, are children aged 11-17. There are 40 million regular users of porn in the US, and 20 percent of these are accustomed to peek at porn sites at work when they think no one is looking.
A new porn site is being created in the US every 40 minutes. The most expensive domain name ever purchased (site link deleted) cost $14 million: an indication of the enormous profits accruing to porn.
Roughly one in three visitors to porn sites are women, with almost one in six women (17 percent) admitting to a serious porn addiction. In the pre-internet age, women were relatively safe from the devastating effects of pornography. No longer. In the last three years alone, online porn viewership for women has quadrupled. It is a myth that women have different preferences to men and show less appetite for hardcore pornography.
A 2008 study found that women showed signs of arousal watching pretty much anything: masturbation, straight sex, girl-on-girl, guy-on-guy, bonobo chimps, everything — everything except pictures of naked men, which did not float a woman’s boat.
Average age of the first internet exposure to pornography is 11 years old. 90 percent of 8-16-year-olds have viewed porn online, mostly while doing homework.
Over half of global child porn (55%) is produced in the US, mostly in the Los Angeles area. There are 100,000 websites offering illegal child porn. Annual child porn revenues range from a low of $3 billion to an unrealistically high $20 billion. Daily Gnutella “child pornography” requests are 116,000 and keep growing. Even more disturbingly, there is strong evidence that an addiction to “normal” adult pornography can lead in time to an appetite for child porn.
Between 2005 and 2009, there was a huge and unexplained 432 percent increase in child pornography use, taking this new sex plague to pandemic levels. [Link lost]
The top video porn producers are found in the US, with Brazil and the Netherlands coming in second and third. The top six US erotica cities are Los Angeles, Las Vegas, New York, Chicago, San Francisco and Miami.
The fully employed female porn star can earn $100k-300k a year, three times more than the average male porn star. The more unnatural the sex is, the higher the rates. An actress who gets $500 for a session of straight vaginal sex can demand $1000 for a session of anal sex and $2000 for “double anal sex”. Celebrity porn stars naturally get paid much more. (Link lost). A criminal pedophile willing to molest a child in front of a live webcam can earn $1000 a night.
The top ten countries most opposed to porn are the Islamic countries, viz., Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Bahrain, Egypt, UAE, Kuwait, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore.
Almost 90 percent of the world’s internet porn pages are produced in the US for distribution to other countries, so the US can be seen as the world’s premier sex emporium.
The big players in the porn distribution market are now the major corporations, and, ultimately, the fabulously rich and faceless executives who control them. These are Fortune 500 companies such as AOL Time-Warner, AT&T, and General Motors. Through their cable and satellite subsidiaries they have distributed, and continue to distribute, vast quantities of pornographic material worldwide.
The number of pornographic websites owned by American Jews is of course a closely guarded secret—this is one politically incorrect statistic Wikipedia is unlikely to supply—but it is common knowledge that Jews dominate the porn industry (See also here and here ). Indeed, it is also common knowledge that six Jewish-owned companies own 96 percent of the world’s media and that Big Media and Big Porn are interlocking and overlapping concerns.
— § —
If 55 percent of the world’s child pornography is produced in the US—according to the British charity National Children’s Homes—23 percent of the world’s child porn is produced in Russia. (Link suppressed)
Whether or not Russian child porn is dominated by Russian Jews remains a nebulous issue. There is a high probability that it is, given that there is substantial evidence of Russian Jewish involvement in sex trafficking, kidnapping, pedophilia, and even child murder in the production of snuff porn movies.
Let me now quote from a news report first published in October 2000. I will intersperse snippets of this report — “JEWISH GANGSTERS RAPED, KILLED CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS TWO ON FILM” — with comments on the same case by Dr William Pierce which you can listen to yourself in the video at the end of this article:
ROME, ITALY — Italian and Russian police, working together, broke up a ring of Jewish gangsters who had been involved in the manufacture of child rape and snuff pornography.
Three Russian Jews and eight Italian Jews were arrested after police discovered they had been kidnapping non-Jewish children between the ages of two and five years old from Russian orphanages, raping the children, and then murdering them on film.
Mostly non-Jewish customers, including 1700 nationwide, 600 in Italy, and an unknown number in the United States, paid as much as $20,000 per film to watch little children being raped and murdered.
Here is what Dr William Pierce has to say:
“I suggest that if you asked your favorite Jewish media boss why his report of the police raids in Italy and the arrest of the child pornographers in Moscow didn’t get more news coverage in the United States, he’ll tell you that such news would only generate hatred against the Jews. And you know, he’d be right.
“My view is that such people should SIMPLY BE KILLED ON THE SPOT whenever and wherever they are found. More than that, the people who promote and encourage the extreme individualist mindset through their control of the media SHOULD BE EXTERMINATED ROOT AND BRANCH AS A CLASS.”
(Video transcript, emphasis added)
The news report concludes:
Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11 million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives responsible, claiming they were spreading “blood libel.”
Though AP and Reuters both ran stories on the episode, US media conglomerates refused to carry the story on television news, saying that it would prejudice Americans against Jews.
Dr Pierce is naturally outraged at these dirty tricks to conceal from the public the heavy Jewish role in snuff porn pedophilia: the systematic torture and murder of little children by Jewish pornographers in order to sate the jaded appetites of sexual perverts in the West:
“If there’s any group of people on this planet who have valid reasons for hating the Jews, it’s the Russians…. The Jews bled Russia dry with 70 years of Marxist rule and and murdered tens of millions of Russians—the best Russians—in the Communist slave labor camps or in the basements of the secret police headquarters or beside the shooting pits in forests all over Russia and Ukraine.
They have forced thousands of the prettiest young Russian women into prostitution and slavery after the fall of Communism; and now they kidnap Russian children and rape and sexually torture them in front of a camera in order to make child porn for rich perverts in the West.”
With the full connivance of the American government, Jews pursue this foul trade in the San Fernando valley, California, otherwise known as “Porn Valley”. (See here). No, the public largely remains unaware of these iniquitous facts, for the simple reason that the media covers up the facts.
The situation in Russia is even more extreme, with the majority of Russians totally unaware of the historical crimes committed against them by Jews in the Communist era. Here is Dr Pierce’s incendiary comment, and we must make allowances for his white-hot anger:
The Jews are lucky they still control most of the television and other mass media in Russia—because if the Russian people ever are fully awakened to what the Jews are still doing to them, they will rise up and kill every Jew in Russia—every Jew—every Jew!—and they will be fully justified in doing so.
Whatever you do, don’t miss this electrifying video before it is banned.
With permission from
By Crystal Foster, CollectiveEvolution.com
April 11, 2017
An episode of Dr Phil aired recently in which a woman spoke about being born into sexual slavery.
She talked about her life having been sexually abused from before she could talk right through to adulthood.
An “owner” had control of her, and sold her to wealthy clients for sexual/sadistic abuse and torture.
People have had mixed reactions to this. A number of people seem to have taken Kendall’s story on board and believe her, and consider this information in light of several other stories that have brought to light the reality of organized sexual abuse.
To scratch the surface in the mainstream media:
Some people do not believe her, and are unwilling to entertain the possibility that organized groups with a lot of money could be engaged in such practices.
I completely get that. I don’t want it to be true either. My work with sexual abuse victims, however, has opened my eyes to a horrific reality that exists in our world — including in small, everyday communities in Western society, where people would never imagine this is happening.
I have met people who were prostituted by family members for money, trafficked through gangs, and abused by groups of trusted people.
For these women and men to even be sitting in front of me ready to talk, they have to have already (mostly) overcome the overwhelming fear that they will be found and killed for telling the truth about what happened to them.
Abuse like this is so incredibly horrifying to experience, that the shock of it alone can be enough to fear any possible repercussions for trying to get away or reach out for help once they are away from the abusers.
Many people who live through sexual /sadistic abuse cannot bring themselves to talk about what happened because they fear no-one would believe them.
How has this widespread problem existed in relative secrecy for so long?
I believe there are a few elements to this.
Physical Control by Perpetrators
Perpetrators go to great lengths to cover their tracks. This can mean ending someone’s life in some cases. Other sexual abuse victims can be kept in slavery and never given the opportunity to escape.
Mental Control by Perpetrators
For those for whom there may be a possibility of escape, perpetrators will use skilled manipulation to keep a victim terrified and under control.
People or animals may be killed in front of them, to demonstrate what will happen if they don’t comply or ever try to escape.
Other abusers who harm children who are still living in the community may make threats while carrying out the abuse, like:
“If you ever tell anyone, I will kill your Mother/baby brother/best friend,” or “If you try to talk about this, I will do to your little sister what I have been doing to you.”
Other manipulative words focus on the victim being the one who is to blame for the abuse. Some perpetrators tell the one they are abusing things like:
“You are dirty and this is your fault,” or “If you didn’t look like that I wouldn’t be doing this to you.”
In the case of Kendall, she was told “You were born for this purpose” and nothing in her life proved otherwise.
Manipulative words have the potential to sink in and become belief systems. Victims can feel either too afraid to talk because of what the abuser will do, or they can believe that it is their fault and no-one would offer them help anyway.
Abusers whose victims still live in the community have usually gone to great lengths to establish themselves in positions of authority and trust.
The perpetrators of abuse on these children are usually known to them or their family, but trusted because of the position they hold or their ability to manipulate the parents into believing they are good people.
This can make it even harder for victims to speak out, because people react with disbelief because it does not fit the picture they have built in their minds of the alleged perpetrator.
The more well-established this positive picture is in people’s minds, the harder it is to get someone to believe that the perpetrator would actually do something like that (think Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris, and Bill Cosby).
A huge step for victims of sexual abuse is finally making the decision to reach out for help and speak to someone about what happened to them.
For some, this has happened after a big internal battle where part of their conditioning tells them they are worth nothing and they don’t deserve any help.
A small voice inside, however, is saying “No, it’s not okay for this to happen to anyone” and this is the voice I hope they listen to.
Failure to be Believed
Sexual abuse perpetrators and human traffickers know that most people are good, decent people, who would never dream of committing rape/sexual abuse, or sadistic torture.
They exploit this fact to the utmost degree. Many victims who have spoken out about being abused/trafficked/tortured have been met with utter disbelief.
It is so incredibly hard for a person to have lived through what a sexual abuse survivor has lived through, have fought a battle to find the courage to talk about it, only to be dismissed.
Widespread pedophilia among the world’s “elite”:
Why Does This Happen?
Why do good people sometimes fail to believe victims of sexual abuse?
For many people, it is actually too much to believe that this is happening, and happening to great numbers of people. Of course we all want there to be another explanation. But where are all these women and children who go missing every day? Where are they?
I have listened to people whose parents didn’t believe them ask me why. “Why didn’t they believe me?” It is such a heart-breaking question. One of the ways I have tried to make sense of it has been by looking inside myself.
There was a stage as a newly practicing therapist when I wasn’t sure I could do a job where my sole focus would be to work with people who had suffered sexual abuse.
I knew that I would have to be there with them, fully present and with an open heart, holding space and helping them work through the depths of their pain, and I didn’t know if I could do it.
What I have found through working in mental health is that sexual abuse is happening everywhere. People like me had to learn how to face our fear and help anyway, even if we thought we might cry. Because if not us, who? If not now, when?
This is why I think that people sometimes turn away from victims and do not believe them; because they are not ready to face that amount of pain. They are not ready to accept that humans do this to each other, or would do that to their own child.
Maybe they have no explanation for why humans do this to each other, so because they can’t rationally understand it, they reject it.
Maybe they are not ready to accept that we live in a world where this is happening every day, by people in all levels of society, because that is far too horrifying.
It is time for us all to realize that this is happening. Widespread sexual abuse and human trafficking is a reality in our world today.
To help the ones who need our help now, or may one day reach out to us, we as a collective need to learn how to face this painful truth, with all the emotion it brings up in us.
When we can turn toward our own painful emotional reactions with acceptance and compassion, we can begin to come to terms with what is happening.
Doing this helps us learn how to nurture ourselves with love through our own pain, and we then feel more compassion and empathy for those who are suffering around us. This is how we as humanity can come through this as a whole, in support of each other.
April 2, 2017
Putin has delivered a scathing speech, accusing western nations of “promot[ing] the propaganda of pedophilia” through eroding Christian objectives and moral ones too. The Russian President talks about moral decay in a system and normalizing behaviors that he sees as leading to “degradation and primitivization (of culture).”
“Without the moral values that are rooted in Christianity and other world religions, without rules and moral values which have formed and been developed over millennia, people will inevitably lose their human dignity,” Putin says.
“Christian Holidays and celebrations are abolished or ‘neutrally’ renamed, as if one were ashamed of those Christian holidays. With this method one hides away the deeper moral value of these celebrations.”
But it is the traditional notion of identity that concerns Putin. Traditional identity is being “denied or relativized” while new ideals are put forward. He questions the cost and accuses the West of placing Satan as an equal to God, and normalizing pedophilia through political correctness.
“The excesses and exaggerations of Political Correctness in these countries indeed leads to serious consideration for the legitimization of parties that promote the propaganda of pedophilia,” he said in the speech. “One has to respect the right of every minority to self-determination, but at the same time there cannot and must not be any doubt about the rights of the majority.”
The speech places the spotlight again on sex trafficking and pedophile rings. Only this month, western mainstream media ‘forgot’ to report on two very large international child trafficking rings busted. Government officials from India and Niger were involved, and possibly western elites, but the Mainstream Media chose to remain silent, begging the question why. This is one example of many where the West attempts to normalize or ignore pedophilia behaviors.
The corporate media’s push propels such agendas and Putin isn’t taking the matter lightly.
Only this year, a controversial bill was signed by Putin banning US citizens from adopting Russian children. Some critics say it was Putin’s way of fighting back at a new American law aimed at human rights abuses in Russia. But Putin maintains its aim was directed at the “out of control” pedophilia in the United States, particularly in Washington D.C.
Like most leaders, Putin is far from perfect. But technically he’s correct. How many times do you hear someone jump to the defense of a pedophile, claiming they’re just ‘sick in the head?’ This is a form of normalizing a behavior that a person has chosen to do. Laws are in place, laws are broken, child gets hurt. There is no excuse.
Putin talks about this moral erosion on an international scale too. The Red Scare is underway, but he questions why. Putin’s view is that Russia’s refusal to accept the US lead in transnationalism and thus surrender national autonomy, leads to the latest bogeyman persona the mainstream media have gifted him. It is the “moral crisis in the West” and its attempts to “remove institutions of international right and national sovereignty [via US Imperium]” for a more unified, unipolar world that create the morality problem.
Putin’s speech is not far-fetched, though granted, on face value appears this way. Any attempts to alienate an ideal or nation starts with the stripping back of morals surrounding it. Domestically, its pedophilia, religious intolerance, or the rationalizing of other similar behaviors once deemed unacceptable. According to Putin, it then stretches outward in the form of conflict to those defiant of the new objectives.
Russia faces a bombardment of western criticism. And some of it is well deserved. However, it is difficult to ignore the validity of normalizing behaviors once unacceptable, that are now harming others. Where do you draw the line?
According to Putin, it is impossible to move forward without “spiritual, cultural and national self-determination’”
Directed by Jeanny Gearing (2014)
Power is a disturbing documentary about a South African martial arts expert Debi Stevens and her efforts to fight India’s rape culture by teaching Indian girls to defend themselves. The film was produced following the 2012 gang rape and murder of a 23 year old physiotherapy intern on a Delhi bus.
In addition to showing excerpts from some of Stevens’s classes, Power provides disturbing insights into a cultural framework that makes it “okay” for 75% of India’s urban males population to sexually assault women. As in the Middle East, India’s extremely patriarchal and misogynist culture, combined with a large population of permanently unemployed males seems to set the stage for this kind of violence against women.
I found this film particularly instructive in view of recent publicity about migrants committing group sexual assaults in Cologne – in a variant of the Arab rape game Taharrush (see It’s an Arab rape game called Tarrarush).
Jyoti Singh‘s attackers were neither Arab nor Muslim but Hindu.
From and with permission of
Jan 9, 2016
Did you know that British Prime Minister David Cameron is closely associated with Jewish pornographers and their families and that the entire British government is surrounded by a sickly aroma of smut and sleaze?
Based on this article by Guy Adams in the Daily Mail
SEX SHOP OWNER JACQUELINE GOLD
WITH HER JEWISH PORN BARON FATHER DAVID GOLD
LD: The 55-year-old Ms Gold boasts, “I have empowered women in the bedroom,” referring to the sad fact that she has managed to persuade 2.5 million sexually frustrated British women to buy her company’s Rampant Rabbit vibrators each year, making her the 16th richest woman in Britain and a darling of the British political establishment.
Smiling for the cameras as she emerged from a silver Rolls-Royce, her diamond-encrusted necklace, handbag and watch twinkling under the flashbulbs, Jacqueline Gold made quite an entrance to the Conservative Party’s last Black And White Ball.
While many other wealthy guests scurried in through a side door, a few even shielding their faces in the process, she happily stopped and posed in a velvet dress for the paparazzi who had gathered on the pavement of London’s Park Lane, outside the exclusive Grosvenor House Hotel.
It was a very public show of support for a Tory party which had, just a month earlier, unveiled Ms Gold — who as chief executive of Ann Summers is best known for bringing the ‘Rampant Rabbit’ sex toy to Britain — as its latest glamorous celebrity supporter.
It was, perhaps, in return for her political support that British Prime Minister David Cameron personally invited Ms. Gold — who is worth a reputed £240 million ($355 million) — to sit at his right hand at February’s £1,500-a-ticket ball, at which a bronze bust of Margaret Thatcher sold for £210,000 and a shoe-shopping trip with Home Secretary Theresa May fetched a four-figure sum.
Joining her at the Prime Minister’s table were such tycoons as hedge fund manager Andrew Law and City tycoon Michael Spencer.
Quite a blue chip circle, one might observe, for a brassy female entrepreneur who grew rich bringing ‘Vibrating Nipple Clamps’, ‘Couples Vibrating Love Eggs’, and the ‘Divine Prostate Massager’ to the British High Street.
Not least since Ann Summers is still (according to its annual accounts) controlled by her father David, a pornographer whose stable of degrading magazines once included ‘Teenage Hardcore’, and whose titles advertised ‘barely legal young sweet p***y’.
The British Prime Minister was doubtless perfectly comfortable in Miss Gold’s company, however. For he appears to take a relaxed attitude towards her family’s line of business.
After all, it’s only two years since British Prime Minister David Cameron gave a Conservative peerage to Karren Brady, a longstanding protégée of David Gold’s business partner David Sullivan [another Jewish porn baron] — making her his official ‘Small Business Tsar’ in the process.
Back then, it was widely noted that the convent-educated Karren Brady, nowadays best known as a sidekick of Alan Sugar [yet another prominent Jewish entrepreneur] on The Apprentice, has a colourful past for a member of the British House of Lords.
She had, after all, begun her career in the Eighties as a director of Sullivan and Gold’s ‘boobs and bums’ premium sex lines, and of their smut-filled Sport newspapers.
LASHA DARKMOON COMMENTS:
Karren Brady (right), was given a peerage by British PM David Cameron two years ago. She began her career in the 1980s working for Britain’s smut-filled tabloid the Sport newspaper, also promoting the ‘boobs and bum’ premium sex lines. David Sullivan (far left) and David Gold (centre), joint owners of a long list of porno magazines and the sleazy down-market Sport newspaper—running sex adds like this— were her proud Jewish employers. All these people have met and spoken with the British Prime Minister David Cameron and have helped, directly or indirectly, to steer the British government into a sordid cul de sac of dirty sex and sleaze.
For my part, I have nothing personal against David Cameron and regard him, warts and all, as infinitely preferable to the unconvicted war criminal Tony Blair. Blair, too, took money from pornographers and invited Jewish pornographer Richard Desmond, publisher of the Daily Express and Asian Babes—and with links to the New York mafia—to tea at Downing Street.
Here the allegedly devout Christian Blair, we are told, showed “a keen interest in his [Desmond’s] porn magazines“, asking him if “Forty Plus” referred to the age of the porn models or their breast size measurements. So much for the off-duty interests of Tony Blair—who once boasted to the Sun newspaper that he could easily have sex “five times a night”, if not more, and who reflected candidly on a sexual encounter with his wife Cherie on a London bus, “I was an animal following my instinct.”
Fast forward to last spring, and Jacqueline Gold’s journey to join Karren Brady at the heart of the Tory establishment was continuing apace. She campaigned vigorously for the Tories during both the election and the ensuing autumn conference season, when she hosted a fringe event addressed by Nicky Morgan, the Education Secretary and Minister for Women. That journey was then completed this week, in spectacular fashion, when the New Year’s Honours were announced: the 55-year-old Jacqueline Gold, [daughter of the sleazy Jewish porn magnate David Gold], was appointed a Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire.
On paper, this signal honour was granted for all the right reasons.
It did not, the announcement stressed, represent some form of payback for her recent decision to support David Cameron. Neither had it anything to do with a misguided notion that Britain should somehow celebrate the trade in sex toys, bondage gear and racy underwear that her 138 Ann Summers stores stock.
Instead, according to the official announcement, Jacqueline Gold was accorded the CBE — just one step down from a Damehood — for her ‘Service to Entrepreneurship, Women in Business and Social Enterprise.’
It should at this stage be stressed that during her 35-year career, Gold has undoubtedly contributed to all three spheres.
Ann Summers, which is based entirely on-shore, employs 10,000 people, including 7,000 female Ann Summers ‘party organisers’, who between them host around 4,000 Tupperware party-style events each week, becoming financially independent while they sell chocolate body paint, fluffy handcuffs, and battery-powered sex toys to guests.
The timing of the CBE, so soon after Jacqueline Gold chose to publicly support the Conservatives, will do nothing to blunt criticism that the British Honours system nowadays revolves around the most tawdry form of political patronage.
Whatever one’s views about all this, a more pertinent question thrown up by the honouring not just of Jacqueline Gold, but also of Karren Brady, is this: why, exactly, are David Cameron’s Tories choosing to get into bed with the protégées of two of Britain’s most notorious porn barons?
Karren Brady’s mentor David Sullivan, who in his Seventies heyday owned 139 sex shops, 20 magazines, 40 race horses and a number of massage parlours, used to boast that the material he peddled was ‘the strongest legally available’ in the UK.
In the spring of 1982, the self-styled ‘Prince of Porn’ was tried at Snaresbrook Crown Court on charges of living off immoral earnings; in other words, of being a pimp.
The alleged offences related to his two London massage parlours, where undercover policemen were offered sexual ‘extras’ by the ‘underpaid and exploited’ female staff who were offering ‘French and Continental’ — as sexual services were euphemistically termed — for £20.
Sullivan denied the charges but was found guilty and sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment. He served 71 days in Wormwood Scrubs and Ford Open Prison.
JEWISH PORNOGRAPHER DAVID SULLIVAN
WORTH $1.25 billion (2015)
LASHA DARKMON COMMENTS
We read this in Wikipedia:
With his partner, David Gold, Sullivan’s first business venture was selling soft pornography photos. They expanded into sex shops, adult magazines and several low-budget blue movies, making Sullivan a millionaire by the age of 25. By the late 1970s, he was in control of half of the adult magazine market, 80% of the adult mail order market, and 150 shops.
In 1982 Sullivan was convicted of living off immoral earnings and after a successful appeal was released after serving 71 days in prison. Sullivan explained that he did not feel embarrassed about the initial source of his early fortunes. “I’ve made a lot of people happy,” he said.
Ah yes, the Jews know how to make people “happy” all right. They are in the front rank of philanthropists and are always moved by the noblest and most altruistic sentiments. I have noted this curious phenomenon of “happiness-spreading” in my long 2-part article “Pornography’s Effect on the Brain”:
Perhaps the quickest way to tame and tranquilize an unruly nation is to turn its citizens into sex addicts: for just as children are easily taken in by predators who tempt them with candy, most people are only too pleased to live under governments that offer them the seductive pleasures of porn: that is to say, cheap and easy orgasms as substitutes for happiness. [LD]
Guy Adams continues:
Jacqueline Gold’s father David Gold (pictured), for his part, managed to stay on the correct side of the law throughout his career. But he nonetheless spent the Seventies being dragged in and out of court in deeply unseemly circumstances.
In 1971, he and his company were cleared at the Old Bailey of publishing obscene materials for gain. He was in the Central Criminal Court again in 1975, to defend himself in relation to 11,000 seized magazines dealing with bondage and flagellation. Gold was cleared once again, as he was in another obscenity case the following year.
Shortly before selling his pornographic titles, which he offloaded in 2007, just ahead of the growing popularity of internet smut causing the printed market to collapse, he said unapologetically: ‘I’m a top-shelf publisher. But that’s how I started out, that’s what I am. And I’m proud of everything I have done.’
Jacqueline Gold joined the family firm in the early Eighties, when she was recently out of school, and over the ensuing years, successfully turned David’s small string of Ann Summers sex shops, patronised by what she called the ‘dirty anorak brigade’ into a High Street chain popular with women, which last year turned over almost £105 million.
It was her idea to devote large areas of the stores to selling erotic lingerie, and novelty items such as edible nipple tassels (with sex toys confined to small sections of the shops), since it meant that they would no longer be officially classified as sex shops, which need to be licensed by local councils.
The brand’s success is, she argues, built on “good clean fun”. [LOL]. And it has been extremely profitable. In the heyday of the ‘Rampant Rabbit’, made famous by the TV show Sex And The City, she claimed that Ann Summers was selling 2.5 million vibrators in the UK each year. Each costs very little to make, but can retail for more than £50 ($75)
LD: The great British empire, a hundred years ago an Empire on which the sun never set, is now a sleazy masturbatorium built on millions of orgasms provided like tap water by degenerate Jews. This gives a new meaning to the phrase “good clean fun”.
The Jews have always been the cheerleaders of “sexual liberation” and have derived their inspiration from the Father of Jewish psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud, famous for saying: “Sexual morality seems to me very contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life.”
Few are aware that, while on board the ship taking him to America, Freud had turned to one of his disciples and remarked cynically: “If only the Americans knew, we are bringing them the plague!”
The plague is sexual demoralization and in particular pornography. The world’s $100 billion porn industry is known to be almost exclusively in Jewish hands: a weapon used to destroy traditional values and spread mass demoralization.
See my article Pornography as a Secret Weapon for further details, especially Section 1: “Jews use pornography ‘to destroy gentile morals’.” [LD]
Like Karren Brady, Jewish sex merchant Jacqueline Gold has rarely been made to discuss the issue of her father’s association with the porn trade.
Indeed, reporters who raise impertinent questions about Ann Summers, or ask whether its success might have contributed to the sexualisation of the High Street, are often treated to a lecture about how the stores empower or liberate women.
In 2005, on one of the only occasions an interviewer succeeded in getting her to address the issue of pornography, the encounter ‘turned a bit chilly’.
‘If you’re talking about hard-core pornography, like most people, I don’t want to see it in stores, or available,’ Gold said. ‘If you’re talking about soft porn, like top-shelf magazines, I personally don’t have a problem with that.’
Asked if she was a feminist, she responded: ‘In the popular sense of the word, no. But I believe in equality for women.’
The Honours committee appears to agree. As, we can only assume, does our Prime Minister.
So it goes that the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire has, like 140 of Britain’s High Streets, now been tarnished by association with Rampant Rabbits, Vibrating Love Eggs, and a family business built on ‘top-shelf’ smut.
“This country is now led by a man whom many voters will forever believe or suspect once had sex with a dead pig.” — Daily Telegraph, here