“That is not “socialism”. Socialism is “share the wealth”, not steal all of the wealth.”
Constant economic predation. Ever more reckless military acts from ever more-desperate regimes. This is the New World Order – the real one.
April 26, 2017
Regular readers are familiar with the Old World Order: the cabal of Western oligarchs who control not only our own puppet governments, but generally dictate events to most nations around the world. The vehicle used by these oligarchs to maintain their (economic) control over Western governments to keep them meek and submissive is the One
Regular readers are also familiar with this entity. The One Bank is a banking crime syndicate. Its dimensions have been previously defined in the computer modeling of a trio of Swiss researchers. The finding of that model is that by itself this crime syndicate controls roughly 40% of the entire global economy – all of the most important sectors.
What is one of the biggest problems for the One Bank? When you are a crime syndicate which controls 40% of the global economy, it becomes hard to continue to hide in the shadows.
The solution? The oligarchs resorted to the same solution they use to cover up all of the One Bank’s mega crimes: propaganda. In this case, it was disinformation. The oligarchs went and borrowed a metaphor which already existed in the extremes of conspiracy-theory writing: “the New World Order.”
They then began spreading this disinformation on a much larger scale than any of the previous conspiracy-mongering in this area. To give the disinformation a veneer of plausibility, the oligarchs of the Old World Order even allowed themselves to be (supposedly) linked to the mythological New World Order.
What is the NWO supposed to be? According to the propagandists (inadvertent and otherwise) who promote it, it is a secret socialist, one-world government being constructed “above” the level of our own pathetic puppet governments.
How do you hide if you are a crime syndicate which controls 40% of the global economy? Where do you hide? Inside a great, big lie.
Alert and intelligent readers should automatically dismiss this NWO as nothing but absurd propaganda. What has the OWO been doing, perpetually and ravenously? Stealing all of the wealth of the masses and piling it atop the own obscene hoards of the oligarchs.
That is not “socialism”. Socialism is “share the wealth”, not steal all of the wealth.
It has become so easy to fool most people with vacuous ideological labels. Barack Obama was frequently labeled a “socialist” by much of the brain-dead Right. What did Obama do for eight years? He stole from the bottom 80% of the U.S. population and gave to his Masters: the Top 0.01%. That is not socialism either. Just another reverse-Robin Hood, right-wing government: steal from the Poor; give to the (very, very) Rich.
There is no “new world order”. There is only the Old World Order, or at least this has been the case for many, many decades up until now.
There is great irony here. The Old World Order invented the myth of the “New World Order” to hide its raping-and-pillaging of the planet. But it is precisely this continuous and ever more rapacious plundering that has now resulted in the rise of an actual New World Order.
This NWO is not a crime syndicate of psychopaths like the Old World Order. Neither is it some totally ridiculous ideological contrivance like the (mythological) New World Order. The real New World Order that is coming into existence today is an association of necessity, led by China and Russia, to help the nations of the Rest of the World protect themselves from the psychopathic West, and the oligarchs in control of it.
Remember the demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War? Weren’t those happy times? The “evil” Soviets had been defeated, and now we were all going to live happily ever after. China and even Russia were wooed by the West – old enemies becoming new friends.
However, when the oligarchs of the One Bank learned that Russia and China had no intentions of serving the West (i.e. the Old World Order), this new friendship quickly deteriorated. The next thing we knew, the Corporate media in the West were back to Cold War rhetoric, simply substituting “Russia” for “Soviet Union”.
Russia was first in the cross-hairs because it had never really benefitted from the new (supposed) era of cooperation between East and West. Put another way, the oligarchs had invested nothing in their faux friendship with Russia. Meanwhile, their puppets in the Corrupt West had already begun targeting nations allied to Russia.
One of the ways these puppet governments have been covering up their own campaign of naked aggression is through fabricating a massive blanket of propaganda. Every act of naked aggression by the West was supposedly a “reaction” by these fascist governments to supposed aggression from Russia’s allies or even Russia itself — or else “the terrorists” (the West’s mercenary henchmen).
It culminated when the U.S. staged a coup in Ukraine, Russia’s closest neighbour and ally. The coup was justified according to the West because the regime previously in power was corrupt. There are two obvious rebuttals to that pathetically flimsy argument.
- There was already an election scheduled in Ukraine in less than six months. Are the Champions of Democracy (what the Corrupt West likes to call itself) telling us that a coup d’etat is better than simply waiting for an election?
- If “corruption” was reason enough to stage a revolution, there would already be revolutions-in-progress all over the West itself.
After the U.S. staged that coup, demonization of Russia dramatically escalated, along with the military campaign against Syria – another Russian ally. Economic terrorism was launched against Russia’s economy. The ruble was ruthlessly attacked by the convicted currency manipulators of the One Bank. Oil prices were manipulated dramatically lower, with Barack Obama publicly boasting that this manipulation was “a part of the U.S. strategy” against Russia.
Soon, even China was targeted. China had outlived its usefulness as a (low wage) jurisdiction for Western multinational corporations. The Chinese people now wanted to be paid decent wages, so the oligarchs had already begun to shift their corporate operations to other even lower-wage jurisdictions.
The excuse for (once again) referring to China as an enemy was/is the South China Sea. While the West flexes its muscles by dropping bombs on the heads of people in Africa and Asia, the Western media has been relentlessly demonizing China for building artificial islands in essentially unoccupied waters.
Building islands or dropping bombs? Which is the more deplorable international crime? According to Western media, it is (conveniently) the “crime” of building islands.
This renewed aggression against Russia and China by the West did not spawn the Rest of the World’s “New World Order”. Instead, this aggression is the belated realization by the West’s psychopathic oligarchs of the existence of this new, world order. While the oligarchs have been busy destroying everything in sight, China and Russia were attempting to build something.
Here China has taken the lead with its Belt and Road Initiative. Loosely based upon China’s ancient “Silk Road”, it is the world’s largest project in terms of infrastructure and economic cooperation, even larger than the Marshall Plan at the end of World War II.
The Marshall Plan was an enormously successful initiative where the oligarchs actually worked on fixing all of the damage and destruction they had engineered after manufacturing World War II. In contrast, the Belt and Road Initiative is a plan to economically fortify (first) Asia and (then) the Rest of the World against the Corrupt West.
Along with this, China and Russia have constructed “parallel” economic institutions which now exist side-by-side with similar Western-based institutions. The great joke here is that while China and Russia have publicly spoken of these institutions existing in conjunction with their (corrupted) versions in the West, the oligarchs can clearly see that they are intended to replace Western-based institutions.
With which institutions would the Rest of the World prefer to do business: entities rancid with corruption like the World Bank and the IMF, or an honest broker like the Asia Development Bank?
Constant economic predation. Ever more reckless military acts from ever more-desperate regimes. The psychopathic empire of the One Bank has simply become so intolerable and so dangerous that the Rest of the World is being forced to unite as a mechanism of self-preservation.
This is the New World Order – the real one.
It really is “new”. It really does involve the “world” (except for the Corrupt West). And it really could/should lead to “order”, not the ever-worsening chaos as the One Bank regularly orders its puppet governments to destroy any nation that gets in its way.
What the New World Order is not is any sort of one-world government. What the New World Order is not is some (supposed) “socialist utopia”.
The new, world order being crafted by China and Russia is non-ideological. It is non-controlling. Another great irony here is that as Western regimes have gotten increasingly corrupt, belligerent, and simply evil, the Eastern powers have become relatively more virtuous.
Perhaps it was simply being able to observe how not to run the world (for several decades), but China and Russia have seemingly adopted the doctrine of Enlightened Self-Interest. By helping neighbouring nations and acting as honest brokers in the global community, China and Russia see the surest path to their own prosperity and security.
Another thing that the New World Order is not is perfect. As global powers, China and Russia do not resemble White Knights, merely the lessers-of-evil – much less evil. The New World Order coming into existence today is not some ideologically based pipe-dream. It is a construct of pragmatism, designed to help nations co-exist and (hopefully) prosper. In time, perhaps it will replace the United Nations – another corrupted Western institution.
The real NWO will succeed as the new “order” in the world because the Old World Order has succeeded in making itself obsolete.
Ron Johnson from STFnews.com joins me to discuss the Satanic Illuminati NWO death cult that is targeting humanity for annihilation.
Telling the truth is a dangerous thing as many know, illegal in fact. Doing so with circumspection, using allegory and a touch of irony is always best, but requires wit and even intellect, something in short supply. That said we move forward.
I have been in discussion recently, with intelligence officials from the Reagan era, military, FBI counter-intelligence and unnamed others and have reached some startling conclusions. You see, recent events have pushed the envelope as to what can be spoken of and “leaked.” There is also enough anger out there, and there is nothing more dangerous than old angry people, that what was once held back can now be spoken of.
Ronald Reagan took office in January 1981. The CIA was beginning a war in Central America, was running operations across Africa and was deeply involved in issues in Egypt and Lebanon. These were things I knew of but am unable to indicate why I may know of them, but my knowledge is personal.
Russia was at war in Afghanistan, the US still had hostages in Iran and America had over 500,000 troops in Europe.
One of the first moves of the Reagan presidency was to “de-task” the CIA and then “re-task the CIA.” Vice President George W. Bush had been CIA director under the truncated presidency of Gerald Ford and had spent this time learning the narcotics business and placing the Bush family at the forefront.
As CIA director, in 1977 Bush sent his son Jeb to Venezuela to take over banking relationships between that nation and Colombia. George H.W. and his son Jeb were seminal in the fostering and creation of the drug cartels in Colombia and established the CIA connection that would burgeon under Reagan, but I am getting ahead of myself. Colombia was all about controlling the world’s cocaine.
Simultaneously, the CIA under Bush established strong connections with the narco-tribes of Northern Afghanistan. While the US, through Pakistan and their military and ISIS, ran the Mujahedeen, the CIA began building a narcotics empire there based on heroin. It would have to wait until another Bush son could take advantage of 9/11, perhaps even have some inside involvement if other intelligence is correct, before the CIA could take over world heroin production as well.
When Reagan got into office, Bush set up a committee, names like North and Secord and even bin Laden were among the strategic planners. Reagan himself brought in Lee Wanta, who sat in on only some of the meetings, meetings that planned economic warfare on Russia, crashing the ruble and eventually crushing the Soviet Union.
However, the primary effort was in simply taking over activities of the CIA and ending America’s intelligence program, as we see now, “forever.” There is no CIA. This is not a fact carelessly stated. Real intelligence is dangerous and from that time onward, congress would never see anything not hand fed them with full approval of key controlling figures who ran the world’s drug trade.
You see, before that the CIA was always independent, and under Allan Dulles perhaps even involved in murdering Kennedy, or so rumors state. The CIA as with the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover, was a law onto itself.
The CIA was certainly capable of using its skills previously aimed at assassinating foreign leader and focusing those capabilities back on the United States.
The CIA as with the Pentagon, were expressions of the will of world oligarchy and whatever the vision of the time was for a New World Order. That vision changed as ideas and situations changed, as technology changed, and as time and death pushed new ideas and new goals to the forefront. Suffice it to say, the CIA and Pentagon, as today, abide as part of America but are certainly not American, not hardly.
Here’s how it looks if you were there:
Let’s say you were working at an operational facility on Monday, January 26, 1981. Communications then was via Telex, there was no internet. As phones were not secure, other communication was via courier, sometimes from embassy channels, other times from airline personnel, “stews” who ran documents and other materials for the CIA. Without Pan Am, there would never have been a CIA.
Typically, an operational office, based on personnel and their skills, connections and networks, might overlap, dealing with let’s say Bulgaria and Jordan and even Panama, simply because the people were there than had the relationships, the language skills and the cover identities that allowed operations.
Nothing was done from Langley, nobody sat in a cube and then taxied to Dulles Airport, off to shoot down a dictator or rig an election, this is TV.
Pretty much everyone worked for a corporation, Michelin, Dupont, Fluor, Bechtel or was media or a banking official or even a diplomat. All were thugs mind you but thugs with day jobs, albeit theoretical cover “day jobs.” In January 1981, all that came to an end.
Now we go to allegory and circumspection. That morning of mornings, the “new broom” in Washington, a former CIA director as Vice President, everything changed. Stories say that one CIA station chief found a prominent Colombian drug cartel leader sitting across his desk when he arrived. Here is how the story goes:
“I got in that morning, past the receptionist, past the armed security that the public never sees, picked up my mail, got my telex’s and opened the door to my office. To my astonishment a Latin looking gentleman was there with a 4-pocket shirt, a big Rolex and a diamond the size of a marble. He was cutting a cigar. He introduced himself as a “Colombian businessman” and told me that he was advised that I would be able to help him. It was that day I met my new boss, or at least one of them.”
From that day forward, Russian agents in Egypt were no longer a problem for the CIA, overthrowing Ghana’s governments didn’t matter so much, in fact the Soviet Union had moved to “back burner.” From that day forward all CIA activities were to involve either moving narcotics or running operations that served no other purpose than to, wait for it…run narcotics.
Why have a war in Central America? Why invent Daniel Ortega, a liberal politician from Nicaragua as a dangerous dictator? Could it be because arming “contras” used planes that accidentally came back loaded with cocaine?
When the CIA took over oil operation services in the Gulf of Mexico around that time, the boats that came into New Orleans and other ports, were “tasked” with carrying “medical supplies” to Honduras to support the covert was on Nicaragua. They came back loaded with, wait for it…cocaine as well.
Every discussion was “cocaine” and how to use CIA technology to avoid police, jam radars, find missing bales of drugs or how to keep America’s allies in Colombia from killing each other off and ruining business.
Miami became the center of the drug universe, where the warriors fighting communism sat in hotel lobby’s with umbrella drinks, heading to the toilet every few minutes to stoke themselves up on cocaine.
Money moved in trash bags, too tiresome to count, some say they only weighed it. That money bought Washington and was a key aspect of White House policy, and the cover operation to sell weapons to Iran through Israel and Saudi Arabia, then use this as a front to launder billions in cocaine cash in what became known as “Iran Contra.”
There was no “Contra,” only cocaine and the cash it brought and the American cities inundated with crack cocaine and a descent into addiction and crime that continues today.
The family that brought crack cocaine to America’s school children now delivers Afghani heroin at even lower prices. When the farce of 9/11 led to two invasions, to Afghanistan to put the drug lords of the Northern Alliance in position to kick out the anti-opium Taliban and to loot Iraq’s oil resources, there was no independent CIA left.
Even the CIA that served the world’s oligarchs, much like other intelligence agencies, might well have stood against the War on Terror, an expression of New World Order that would as we have seen spin out of control taking everyone and everything with it.
By 2004, the Bush family had privatized the CIA, bought off the Pentagon with Afghani drug cash and set up private mercenary armies. Some say, some very knowledgeable people say that every senior American officer that served in Afghanistan is dirty.
The decision was made, based on the lessons, both positive and negative, from Reagan’s Iran Contra adventure, to keep a continual war going as cover but make sure there would never be an American congress capable of investigating.
Toward that end, the US Supreme Court, servants of the narco-thugs, 5 members at least until Scalia died, legalized narco-bribery under what is known as “Citizens United.” This case legalized unlimited “corporate” contributions to any campaign, any corporation, any country and money with “no questions asked.” That money is from drugs and human trafficking primarily and it, along with the curious restructuring of congressional districts after 9/11, that financed with drug cash as well, put the narcotics business in charge of the American House of Representatives, the only investigative body, forever.
From that time on, they only investigated whoever the drug lords told them to.
What is key to understand is that the CIA only runs drugs, nothing else. Drugs are a source of capital and endless political power, all untraced, all attributable and utterly unstoppable during a period of endless war when the CIA runs its own airlines and lives in a world with no frontiers and no oversight of any kind.
Expecting otherwise is insane.
Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War that has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades and consulted with governments challenged by security issues. He’s a senior editor and chairman of the board of Veterans Today, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
April 12, 2017
The Trump Syria strike –
an aggressive, preemptive, unprovoked US attack on Syria which completely violated international law and killed around 14 people (civilians) – was based on the same old lies used to justify virtually every attack, invasion and war in recent history. Trump shocked many people by making the decision to launch 59 tomahawk cruise missiles into Syria, on the morning of April 6th, 2017, right after his administration (via the likes of Secretary of State Tillerson) had just recently stated that the US was no longer attempting regime change in Syria and that the US was no longer interested in trying to remove Assad. In yet another flip-flop, Donald Trump – “President Inconsistent” – turned his back on months of non-interventionist campaigning by attacking a sovereign nation that posed no threat to the US. In doing so, the MSM, which has for months been parroting the line that Trump was a Russian agent, all of a sudden praised Trump for his “beautiful” attacks. But was the Trump Syria strike anything new, or have we literally seen this exact scenario before?
Trump Syria Strike Straight Out of NWO Playbook
To those paying attention, the Trump Syria strike is straight out of the New World Order playbook, line for line. A “cruel dictator attacks his own people with chemical weapons” and the world’s
beneficent bully superpower has to conduct a “humanitarian intervention” to save the “beautiful babies”. Where have we heard the one before? Oh yeah, just 4 years ago. Unlike other pretexts used to attack the nations like Iraq (where the lie was that Saddam had WMDs), the scriptwriters didn’t even bother to change the script from 2013 to 2017. The villain is the same (Assad), the nation to be invaded is the same (Syria), the excuse is the same (tyrant attacking his own people) and the method is the same (chemical weapons). It’s a 2013 redux! The dark forces running the US Government and New Wold Order have got Trump literally reading the exact same script as Obama did 4 years ago. Are most people still too asleep to realize this obvious fact?
(By the way, if you think Trump cares about beautiful babies, you may want to consider why he is supporting the Saudis in their war against the Yemenis, whose beautiful babies are also getting killed.)
Individual citizens are subject to all sorts of requirements in a court of law to prove their cases, yet we now witness the ridiculous spectacle of US Ambassadors to the UN, such as Colin Powell and Nikki Haley, hold up vials of powder and shake photographs of dead children, to supposedly prove a case and justify the invasion of a sovereign nation and the slaughter of innocent people? Is this really the state of humanity?
Fact Check Recall: in 2013, the UN Said the Rebels had the Chemical Weapons, not the Assad Government
Let’s do a quick fact check. When this scenario unfolded in 2013, the UN (United Nations) sent investigators who found sites inside of Syria that were used for chemical weapons. However, the Syrian opposition rebels (funded by and aligned with the US-UK-NATO-Israel-Turkey-Gulf State alliance) were the ones controlling those sites! UN investigator Carla del Ponte (a member of the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria) concluded that she had “strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof” that the “opponents” (rebels) were the ones using the nerve agent, and specifically stated that her panel had no “indication at all that the (authority of the) Syrian government had used chemical weapons.”
Another very important point to consider is that the US confirmed that, after the UN and US inspectors left Syria in 2013, there were no more chemical weapons left. The US, Russia and the international community confirmed that Assad gave them all up. So are we supposed to believe that Assad suddenly gained more in the space of the last 4 years, despite the fact by doing so he would be putting his nation at the very real risk of being invaded by the strongest and most aggressive military in the world, who had already issued a “red line” ultimatum to him?
Who Benefits? Assad and Putin? Or the US, Israel and ISIS?
One of the most important questions for detectives and investigators is to ask “Cui bono” or “Who benefits”? It is very clear that Assad does not benefit from this attack. Do you really think that Assad, after dealing with the invasion of his nation for at least 6 years (although foreign meddling in Syria goes back over 100 years), would suddenly attack his own people with chemical weapons? Do you really think he would do this especially after he had been making such good progress militarily (in repelling ISIS) and diplomatically (to the point where Western leaders were dropping their “Assad must go” agenda)? Given everything that has happened in the last 15 years with US aggression, for a Middle Eastern leader to attack his own citizens with chemical weapons would be crazy, and tantamount to an invitation to US forces to invade. Such an attack would merely galvanize international opposition to the attacker, and ensure his or her fate would be sealed by invading NATO forces, now armed with a great excuse to exercise regime change.
Conversely, we see that ISIS has gained from this attack. This is a report from Al Masdar:
“The Islamic State (ISIL) forces in the eastern countryside of the Homs Governorate launched a powerful offensive this morning, a local military source informed Al-Masdar. Capitalizing on the U.S. missile strikes, the Islamic State stormed the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) checkpoints near the strategic town of Al-Furqalas.”
Supporting ISIS while pretending to fight them so that Assad could be toppled and Syria could be partitioned has always been the game plan.
More Plausible Explanations for the Syrian Chemical “Attack”
There are far more plausible explanations for the Syrian chemical attack. This Global Research article lists some of them. The first is the possibility that Salafist terrorists released the chemicals into the air:
“A far more logical explanation, given the location, is that chemicals were released into the air by Salafist terrorists. The location of the alleged attack is an al-Qaeda-affiliated controlled area in Idlib province. It is from here that the Western-funded White Helmets operate. Rather conveniently, they were soon at the scene of the alleged attack without the necessary protective clothing being filmed hosing down victims. As these are the kinds of people who cut out and eat human organs as well as decapitate heads, they are unlikely to have any compunction in desisting from an opportunity to use Syrian civilians, including children and women, as a form of ‘war porn propaganda’ in order to garner public sympathy as the pretext for Western intervention.”
Alternatively, the site may have been attacked by the Syrian Air Force and the chemicals leaked out. This is what the Russian are saying, along with journalist Tom Duggan and former DIA agent Patrick Donald:
“Syrian-based journalist, Tom Duggan, who has been living in the country for the last four years, claims no gas attack happened. Rather, he asserts that the Syrian air force destroyed a terrorist-owned and controlled chemical weapons factory mistaking it for an ammunition dump, and “the chemicals spilled out.” This seems to be the most plausible explanation. Mr Duggan’s version is markedly similar to the analysis of former DIA colonel, Patrick Lang Donald who, on April 7, 2017 said:
“Trump’s decision to launch cruise missile strikes on a Syrian Air Force Base was based on a lie. In the coming days the American people will learn that the Intelligence Community knew that Syria did not drop a military chemical weapon on innocent civilians in Idlib. Here is what happened:
The Russians briefed the United States on the proposed target. This is a process that started more than two months ago. There is a dedicated phone line that is being used to coordinate and deconflict (i.e., prevent US and Russian air assets from shooting at each other) the upcoming operation.
The United States was fully briefed on the fact that there was a target in Idlib that the Russians believes was a weapons/explosives depot for Islamic rebels.
The Syrian Air Force hit the target with conventional weapons. All involved expected to see a massive secondary explosion. That did not happen. Instead, smoke, chemical smoke, began billowing from the site. It turns out that the Islamic rebels used that site to store chemicals, not sarin, that were deadly. The chemicals included organic phosphates and chlorine and they followed the wind and killed civilians.
There was a strong wind blowing that day and the cloud was driven to a nearby village and caused casualties.
We know it was not sarin. How? Very simple. The so-called “first responders” handled the victims without gloves. If this had been sarin they would have died. Sarin on the skin will kill you. How do I know? I went through “Live Agent” training at Fort McClellan in Alabama.””
We also have the opinion of former CIA agent Philip Geraldi, who has spent years exposing the CIA, Israel and other aspects of the NWO. In an interview with Scott Horton, Geraldi states that he has military and intelligence sources who are “intimately familiar” with the situation who say that the narrative that Assad or Russia did it is bogus. He believes the Russian narrative that Assad’s forces had bombed a storage facility (like Donald above).
Putin: More “Provocations” Are Planned in Syria
In a talk today with Italian President Sergio Mattarella, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia has military intelligence that more of the same “provocations” (which some news sites are translating as “false flags”) are being planned. Putin also talked about how we’ve seen it all before. Here is Putin in his own words:
“President Mattarella and I discussed it, and I told him that this reminds me strongly of the events in 2003, when the US representatives demonstrated at the UN Security Council session the presumed chemical weapons found in Iraq. The military campaign was subsequently launched in Iraq and it ended with the devastation of the country, the growth of the terrorist threat and the appearance of Islamic State [IS, formerly ISIS] on the world stage.
The same thing is happening now. Their [Western] partners are nodding in agreement. Citing our wonderful comedy writers Ilf and Petrov – I want to say, “How boring, ladies!” We’ve seen it all before.
We have reports from multiple sources that other provocations [false flags] like this one – and I cannot call it otherwise – are being prepared in other parts of Syria, including the southern suburbs of Damascus. They plan to plant some chemical there and accuse the Syrian government of an attack.”
Interesting that Putin perceives the Trump Syria strike as basically Trump caving in to the NWO and MIC (Military Intelligence Complex) and how he mentions that Trump will be the first to be criticized in the American media if things go sour or awry.
May the Trump Syria Strike Serve as a Wakeup Call
The Trump Syria strike marks another sad week in world history, as we see leaders continually choosing to initiate violence with no justification to start potential wars. It’s another reminder that the office of US presidency needs to be dismantled, for it is simply too much power for one individual to hold. It’s vindication for all those people warning what a mistake it was to put someone like Trump in charge, who has few firm principles by which he seems to abide.
It’s also a reminder that presidents are all to easily swayed, shaped, bribed and blackmailed into fulfilling the NWO agenda regardless of whatever peaceful and just ambitions they had before entering office. Hopefully this whole incident, where around 14 innocent people were killed, can at least serve as a wakeup call to those who foolishly supported Trump and helped to get him elected.
Want the latest commentary and analysis on Conspiracy, Geopolitics, Natural Health, Sovereignty, Consciousness and more? Sign up for free blog updates!
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance.
March 30, 2017
NWO Anniversaries abound in this year of 2017. This article is a continuation from part 1 and lists 5 major New World Order or NWO anniversaries that are up this year. Now that either exactly 50 or exactly 100 years have passed since these bloody and deceitful events, it is time to revisit them with the perspective of hindsight and the desire for deeper truth. History may not repeat itself, as Mark Twain said, but it sure does rhyme. Our only hope for a better, freer future is to understand the lessons of the past and learn from them. In the case of the worldwide conspiracy and NWO anniversaries, this means learning the truth and being alert and aware. The idea is to see the traps and tricks used on us yesterday, so we do not fall for them again today or tomorrow.
NWO Anniversaries #3: 100 Years Since the Illuminati Russian Revolution
1917 was undoubtedly a big year for humanity. To cap it all off, after the manipulated entry of the US into WW1 and the hallmark Balfour Declaration, we saw a violent and bloody coup take place in Russia, the biggest country on Earth in terms of land area, with a powerful military to boot. However, to name it the “Russian Revolution” is not really representative of what happened. It may be more aptly named the Illuminati Revolution, Illuminati Russian Revolution or even the Jewish Communist Revolution. Why? The reason is that the idea of communism was developed by primarily Jewish thinkers in the late 19th century, funded by primarily Jewish international bankers and executed by at least 1 man (Lev Davidovich Bronstein) who took on a Russian-sounding name – “Leon Trotsky” – to hide his Jewish-sounding name, lest the whole gig be discovered by the Russian public, farmers and peasants. (To be clear, this is not to say that all Jews are in favor of communism or are communists, which would be absurd. It also not to say that the entire NWO conspiracy is a Jewish conspiracy, for that is just one strand of it. However, the Jewish influence on communism and the Russian Revolution is marked and undeniable.)
The truth is that the very richest men in the world, located one block off Wall Street in New York (120 S. Broadway) in a building owned by DuPont, secretly financed the Russian Revolution. Earlier in 1917, before the more significant of the pair of Russian Revolutions took place in November, Vladimir Lenin was in Switzerland and Leon Trotsky was in New York as a penniless immigrant. These 2 fellows were anything but “homegrown” or “grassroots” Russians – they were imports who weren’t even living there at the time! Reminds me of the way NWO manipulator George Soros funds countless NGOs and movements to make them look organic and spontaneous. In Russia in 1917, the propaganda was obviously thick enough that Lenin and Trotsky were accepted as leaders of the revolution.
An excellent source of information for how exactly Lenin and Trotsky were positioned and moved into power can be found in the works of former professor Anthony Sutton, who wrote books such as Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Wall Street and FDR. In these meticulously researched books he shows how the NWO manipulators used the cover of Red Cross to help the Bolsheviks (which he proves using declassified US Government documents). The fact is that the NWO conspirators were shaping the political agenda for Russia, Germany and the US all at the same time: they were behind the Soviet’s first 5 year plan, they were behind the rise of Nazism and they wrote Roosevelt’s New Deal. Who are “they” exactly? The Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, as well as their international banking colleagues such as the Morgans, their companies such as Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (whose management included Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff and Jerome Hanauer [all Jewish]), their agents such as Colonel Mandell House, and their puppet politicians such as Woodrow Wilson. Sutton writes:
“”You will have a revolution, a terrible revolution. What course it takes will depend much on what Mr. Rockefeller tells Mr. Hague to do. Mr. Rockefeller is a symbol of the American ruling class and Mr. Hague is a symbol of its political tools.” – Leon Trotsky, in New York Times, December 13, 1938. (Hague was a New Jersey politician)
President Woodrow Wilson was the fairy godmother who provided Trotsky with a passport to return to Russia to “carry forward” the revolution. This American passport was accompanied by a Russian entry permit and a British transit visa. Jennings C. Wise, in Woodrow Wilson: Disciple of Revolution, makes the pertinent comment, “Historians must never forget that Woodrow Wilson, despite the efforts of the British police, made it possible for Leon Trotsky to enter Russia with an American passport.”
President Wilson facilitated Trotsky’s passage to Russia at the same time careful State Department bureaucrats, concerned about such revolutionaries entering Russia, were unilaterally attempting to tighten up passport procedures.
‘The question now in the readers’ minds must be, were these bankers also secret Bolsheviks? No, of course not. The financiers were without ideology. It would be a gross misinterpretation to assume that assistance for the Bolshevists was ideologically motivated, in any narrow sense. The financiers were power-motivated and therefore assisted any political vehicle that would give them an entree to power: Trotsky, Lenin, the tsar, Kolchak, Denikin — all received aid, more or less. All, that is, but those who wanted a truly free individualist society.”
All these “isms” – communism, bolshevism, fascism, nazism, socialism, capitalism, etc. – are designed to confuse people, create fake opposites and spurn future conflict. When you look at Hitler and Stalin, and their 2 mad regimes, was there much difference between them? They both set up incredibly centralized and authoritarian control systems, and killed their enemies domestically and abroad. We are told that Hitler was a fascist on the far right, and that Stalin was a communist on the far left, yet they are basically the same. In fact, at that time during the 1930s, you could call all the political systems in all 3 countries (Russia, Germany and the USA) socialist, since Hitler’s party was the National Socialists or Nazis for short.
NWO Anniversaries #4: 50 Years Since Israel Attacked Egypt in the 6-Day War
Exactly 50 years ago in 1967, a short lived war took place in the Middle East that had the potential to embroil the US and the Soviet Union in a hot war. It was an Israeli-Arab war known as the 6-day war which still has geopolitical ramifications to day. The official narrative in the West, influenced by the Zionists, was that Israel was defending itself. Where have we heard that one before? The truth is the opposite; Israel launched an attack against Egypt and invaded the entire Sinai peninsula. Israel attacked first. Here is the background in an article by Jeremy Hammond:
“The President of Egypt, then known as the United Arab Republic (UAR), Gamal Abdel Nasser, later conveyed to U.S. President Lyndon Johnson that his troop buildup in the Sinai Peninsula prior to the war had been to defend against a feared Israeli attack. In a meeting with Nasser, Johnson’s special envoy to the UAR, Robert B. Anderson, expressed U.S. puzzlement over why he had massed troops in the Sinai, to which Nasser replied, “Whether you believe it or not, we were in fear of an attack from Israel. We had been informed that the Israelis were massing troops on the Syrian border with the idea of first attacking Syria, there they did not expect to meet great resistance, and then commence their attack on the UAR.”
Anderson then told Nasser “that it was unfortunate the UAR had believed such reports, which were simply not in accordance with the facts”, to which Nasser responded that his information had come from reliable sources (presumably referring to intelligence information passed along by the USSR).
Yitzhak Rabin, who would later become Prime Minister, told Le Monde the year following the ’67 war, “I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions which he sent to the Sinai, on May 14, would not have been sufficient to start an offensive against Israel. He knew it and we knew it.”
Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledged in a speech in 1982 that its war on Egypt in 1956 was a war of “choice” and that, “In June 1967 we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.””
So Egypt was basically scared Israel would attack, so Egypt massed their military along the border, which Israel took as a sign Egypt would attack – so then Israel attacked first. The CIA knew that Israel had enough military muscle to prevail against Egypt, Syria and Jordan.
“Four days before Israel’s attack on Egypt, [Director of Central Intelligence Richard] Helms met with a senior Israeli official who expressed Israel’s intent to go to war, and that the only reason it hadn’t already struck was because of efforts by the Johnson administration to restrain both sides to prevent a violent conflict.
“Helms interpreted the remarks as suggesting that Israel would attack very soon”, writes Robarge. He reported to Johnson “that Israel probably would start a war within a few days.”
“Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center”, which had received the report “that Israel had launched its attack” and that, contrary to Israel’s claims that Egypt had been the aggressor, Israel had fired first.”
The consequences of the 6-day war were grave for many of the Arabian states surrounding Israel. The Zionist regime, as has always been its goal, expanded its territory by theft and force in order to fulfill the mission of establishing greater Israel (“all the land from the Niles to the Euphrates”). These days many nations (and international bodies like the UN) constantly talk of a return to the pre-1967 borders as a condition for peace, which means a return to the territorial boundaries as they were before the 6-day war. Yes, Israel returned some of the land it stole during the 6-day war, but not all of it; for example, it still retains control of the Golan Heights which it took from Syria.
NWO Anniversaries #5: 50 Years Since Israel Attacked the USS Liberty
During the 6-day war, which occurred from June 5th to 10th, 1967, another infamous incident happened which deserves recognition of its own. I refer to the Israeli false flag attack on the USS Liberty, a colossal act of treachery where Israel shot at an American ship at a time when the US had already become one of its biggest allies. LBJ was the US President at the time and was much friendlier to the Zionist regime than JFK (who had challenged Ben-Gurion over Israeli nukes at Dimona). LBJ was in on the JFK assassination and was clearly a man with little scruples. He had already signed off on the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, where the US pretended its ships were being attacked so as to have an excuse to start a war with North Vietnam.
The idea of this false flag op was to frame Egypt, so that the US would think that Egypt was attacking its vessels, and thus join the 6-day war on the side of the Israelis against the Arabs. At 6:05am in the morning, the sailors on the USS Liberty waved at the Israeli pilots, whose jets they recognized because they had the Star of David. At 2:00 pm, the Israeli jets attacked. They first took out all antennae with heat-seeking missiles. The attack lasted as long as the attack on Pearl Harbor. The Israelis put napalm on the bridge of the USS Liberty ship, killing 34 and wounding 172. The Israelis jets later covered up the Star of David.
After the aerial attack, torpedo boats came, shot, lifted the boat out of the water, and almost caused it to sink. Admiral McCain (Senator John McCain’s father) ordered the investigation to be completed within 1 week (which was impossible), rushing it so that it could remain a cover-up.
Mike Rivero writes about the captains and admirals who exposed this false flag incident:
“A former Navy attorney who helped lead the military investigation of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 American servicemen says former President Lyndon Johnson and his defense secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident was an accident.
In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy’s inquiry to “conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.”
It was “one of the classic all-American cover-ups,” said retired Admiral Thomas Moorer, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the attack as part of an independent panel he formed with other former military officials. The panel also included a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, James Akins.
“Why would our government put Israel’s interests ahead of our own?” Moorer asked from his wheelchair at the news conference. He was chief of naval operations at the time of the attack.”
I can answer that question for Moorer: it’s because Israel has its tentacles deep within the US Government and controls it to a very large degree.
False flag operations have long been a Zionist speciality, including the fake radio transmitter that tricked Reagan into attacking Libya as well as 911 itself. Israel has been framing Arabs for decades. Now in 2017, more than ever, it’s time for the world to wake up to these NWO anniversaries.
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance.
Keep ignoring this message and see the world you know crumble into despair and slavery.