20 Jan 2023
Professor Clancy worked with Professor David Sackett, the founder of the modern evidence-based medicine movement, for over 4 years. Here we discuss the nature and importance of EBM and how this has been corrupted to the detriment of patient care.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/how-can-we-trust-institutions-lied
BY TYLER DURDEN
SATURDAY, JAN 14, 2023
Authored by Abir Ballan via The Brownstone Institute,
Trust the Authorities, trust the Experts, and trust the Science, we were told.
Public health messaging during the Covid-19 pandemic was only credible if it originated from government health authorities, the World Health Organization, and pharmaceutical companies, as well as scientists who parroted their lines with little critical thinking.
In the name of ‘protecting’ the public, the authorities have gone to great lengths, as described in the recently released Twitter Files (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) that document collusion between the FBI and social media platforms, to create an illusion of consensus about the appropriate response to Covid-19.
They suppressed ‘the truth,’ even when emanating from highly credible scientists, undermining scientific debate and preventing the correction of scientific errors. In fact, an entire bureaucracy of censorship has been created, ostensibly to deal with so-called MDM— misinformation (false information resulting from human error with no intention of harm); disinformation (information intended to mislead and manipulate); malinformation (accurate information intended to harm).
From fact-checkers like NewsGuard, to the European Commission’s Digital Services Act, the UK Online Safety Bill and the BBC Trusted News Initiative, as well as Big Tech and social media, all eyes are on the public to curtail their ‘mis-/dis-information.’
“Whether it’s a threat to our health or a threat to our democracy, there is a human cost to disinformation.” — Tim Davie, Director-General of the BBC
But is it possible that ‘trusted’ institutions could pose a far bigger threat to society by disseminating false information?
Although the problem of spreading false information is usually conceived of as emanating from the public, during the Covid-19 pandemic, governments, corporations, supranational organisations and even scientific journals and academic institutions have contributed to a false narrative.
Falsehoods such as ‘Lockdowns save lives’ and ‘No one is safe until everyone is safe’ have far-reaching costs in livelihoods and lives. Institutional false information during the pandemic was rampant. Below is just a sample by way of illustration.
The health authorities falsely convinced the public that the Covid-19 vaccines stop infection and transmission when the manufacturers never even tested these outcomes. The CDC changed its definition of vaccination to be more ‘inclusive’ of the novel mRNA technology vaccines. Instead of the vaccines being expected to produce immunity, now it was good enough to produce protection.
The authorities also repeated the mantra (at 16:55) of ‘safe and effective’ throughout the pandemic despite emerging evidence of vaccine harm. The FDA refused the full release of documents they had reviewed in 108 days when granting the vaccines emergency use authorisation. Then in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, it attempted to delay their release for up to 75 years. These documents presented evidence of vaccine adverse events. It’s important to note that between 50 and 96 percent of the funding of drug regulatory agencies around the world comes from Big Pharma in the form of grants or user fees. Can we disregard that it’s difficult to bite the hand that feeds you?
The vaccine manufacturers claimed high levels of vaccine efficacy in terms of relative risk reduction (between 67 and 95 percent). They failed, however, to share with the public the more reliable measure of absolute risk reduction that was only around 1 percent, thereby exaggerating the expected benefit of these vaccines.
They also claimed “no serious safety concerns observed” despite their own post-authorisation safety report revealing multiple serious adverse events, some lethal. The manufacturers also failed to publicly address the immune suppression during the two weeks post-vaccination and the rapidly waning vaccine effectiveness that turns negative at 6 months or the increased risk of infection with each additional booster. Lack of transparency about this vital information denied people their right to informed consent.
They also claimed that natural immunity is not protective enough and that hybrid immunity (a combination of natural immunity and vaccination) is required. This false information was necessary to sell remaining stocks of their products in the face of mounting breakthrough cases (infection despite vaccination).
In reality, although natural immunity may not completely prevent future infection with SARS-CoV-2, it is however effective in preventing severe symptoms and deaths. Thus vaccination post-natural infection is not needed.
The WHO also participated in falsely informing the public. It disregarded its own pre-pandemic plans, and denied that lockdowns and masks are ineffective at saving lives and have a net harm on public health. It also promoted mass vaccination in contradiction to the public health principle of ‘interventions based on individual needs.’
It also went as far as excluding natural immunity from its definition of herd immunity and claimed that only vaccines can help reach this end point. This was later reversed under pressure from the scientific community. Again, at least 20 percent of the WHO’s funding comes from Big Pharma and philanthropists invested in pharmaceuticals. Is this a case of he who pays the piper calls the tune?
The Lancet, a respectable medical journal, published a paper claiming that Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) — a repurposed drug used for the treatment of Covid-19 — was associated with a slight increased risk of death. This led the FDA to ban the use of HCQ to treat Covid-19 patients and the NIH to halt the clinical trials on HCQ as a potential Covid-19 treatment. These were drastic measures taken on the basis of a study that was later retracted due to the emergence of evidence showing that the data used was false.
In another instance, the medical journal Current Problems in Cardiology retracted —without any justification— a paper showing an increased risk of myocarditis in young people following the Covid-19 vaccines, after it was peer-reviewed and published. The authors advocated for the precautionary principle in the vaccination of young people and called for more pharmacovigilance studies to assess the safety of the vaccines. Erasing such findings from the medical literature not only prevents science from taking its natural course, but it also gatekeeps important information from the public.
A similar story took place with Ivermectin, another drug used for the treatment of Covdi-19, this time potentially implicating academia. Andrew Hill stated (at 5:15) that the conclusion of his paper on Ivermectin was influenced by Unitaid which is, coincidentally, the main funder of a new research centre at Hill’s workplace —the University of Liverpool. His meta-analysis showed that Ivermectin reduced mortality with Covid-19 by 75 percent. Instead of supporting Ivermectin use as a Covid-19 treatment, he concluded that further studies were needed.
The suppression of potentially life-saving treatments was instrumental for the emergency use authorization of the Covid-19 vaccines as the absence of a treatment for the disease is a condition for EUA (p.3).
Many media outlets are also guilty of sharing false information. This was in the form of biased reporting, or by accepting to be a platform for public relations (PR) campaigns. PR is an innocuous word for propaganda or the art of sharing information to influence public opinion in the service of special interest groups.
The danger of PR is that it passes for independent journalistic opinion to the untrained eye. PR campaigns aim to sensationalise scientific findings, possibly to increase consumer uptake of a given therapeutic, increase funding for similar research, or to increase stock prices. The pharmaceutical companies spent $6.88 billion on TV advertisements in 2021 in the US alone. Is it possible that this funding influenced media reporting during the Covid-19 pandemic?
Lack of integrity and conflicts of interest have led to an unprecedented institutional false information pandemic. It is up to the public to determine whether the above are instances of mis- or dis-information.
Public trust in the Media has seen its biggest drop over the last five years. Many are also waking up to the widespread institutional false information. The public can no longer trust ‘authoritative’ institutions that were expected to look after their interests. This lesson was learned at great cost. Many lives were lost due to the suppression of early treatment and an unsound vaccination policy; businesses ruined; jobs destroyed; educational achievement regressed; poverty aggravated; and both physical and mental health outcomes worsened. A preventable mass disaster.
We have a choice: either we continue to passively accept institutional false information or we resist. What are the checks and balances that we must put in place to reduce conflicts of interest in public health and research institutions? How can we decentralise the media and academic journals in order to reduce the influence of pharmaceutical advertising on their editorial policy?
As individuals, how can we improve our media literacy to become more critical consumers of information? There is nothing that dispels false narratives better than personal inquiry and critical thinking. So the next time conflicted institutions cry woeful wolf or vicious variant or catastrophic climate, we need to think twice.
Global Research, January 12, 2023
Dr. Mark Trozzi 11 January 2023
***
Thanks to Aga Wilson and Children’s Health Defence Europe for bringing international attention to the unlawful weaponization of the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and British Columbia, against ethical doctors who maintain our oaths and responsibilities, while refusing to participate in the covid-crimes-against-humanity. Here is the interview.
I take great pride in being one of these physicians. Dr. Hoffe, Dr. Luchkiw, Dr. Phillips, and Michael Alexander JD and are on my short list of heroes.
Video: Dr. McCullough Facing Certifications Revocation for Alleged “False…Information” Dissemination
https://tube.childrenshealthdefense.eu/videos/embed/bdd15ed7-25b4-432e-828e-38a3e02365fb
*
These so-called “doctors” whipped everyone into a fear frenzy. Their tweets would get tens of thousands of retweets and engagement daily. The “doctors” posed as ER physicians and were part of the LGBTQ community in some way.
They created this hellish/apocalyptic scenario that made it sound as if bodies were piling up in the streets. Well, this probably won’t come as a huge surprise to you, but those popular “ER doctors” were fake.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-01-07-er-doctors-on-twitter-covid-fake.html
by: JD Heyes
Saturday, January 07, 2023
The advent of social media has become the bane of modern society, as it has created a world that literally does not exist, for the most part.
Gone are the days of “MySpace” and the early years of Facebook, when users simply posted status updates, photos from places they visited, recipes, and other things to keep in touch with family and friends.
Today’s version of social media exists to foist lies, propaganda, and false narratives on tens of millions of people by the minute, used by government and some in the private sector for non-stop psychological warfare, as Twitter boss Elon Musk has recently revealed with his dumps of “Twitter Files.”
Now, we learn that Twitter was used to spread massive lies about the COVID-19 pandemic in order to scare the public into complying with one tyrannical mandate after another.
As Revolver News reports, a pair of ‘E.R. doctors’ who claimed that they witnessed dozens of COVID deaths per shift were not even real people:
If you were on Twitter back when the COVID “fear-mongering” was at its peak, you’ll likely remember the “Twitter doctors” who popped up, seemingly out of thin air, claiming they were losing hordes of patients to COVID every single day.
These so-called “doctors” whipped everyone into a fear frenzy. Their tweets would get tens of thousands of retweets and engagement daily.
The “doctors” posed as ER physicians and were part of the LGBTQ community in some way. They created this hellish/apocalyptic scenario that made it sound as if bodies were piling up in the streets.
Well, this probably won’t come as a huge surprise to you, but those popular “ER doctors” were fake.
The site quoted a bombshell report in the San Francisco Standard, which revealed the false flag operation.
“Last month, Dr. Robert Honeyman lost their sister to Covid. They wrote about it on Twitter and received dozens of condolences, over 4,000 retweets and 43,000 likes,” the outlet reported. “Exactly one month later, on Dec. 12, Honeyman wrote that another tragedy had befallen their family.”
“Sad to announce that my husband has entered a coma after being in hospital with Covid. The doctor is unsure if he will come out,” they tweeted. “This year has been the toughest of my life losing my sister to this virus. This is the first time in my life I don’t see light at the end of the tunnel.”
Once more, the condolences and well-wishes poured in — Americans are a compassionate lot, after all, regardless of what lying leftist Democrats often say. But again, none of this was true.
It was all fake.
“Honeyman wasn’t real,” the San Francisco Standard reported. “The transgender ‘Doctor of Sociology and Feminist studies’ with a ‘keen interest in poetry” who used they/them pronouns was, in fact, a stock photo described on DepositPhotos, a royalty-free image site, as ‘Smiling happy, handsome Latino man outside—headshot portrait.’
“Their supposedly comatose husband, Dr. Patrick C. Honeyman, was also fake. His Twitter photo had been stolen from an insurance professional in Wayne, Indiana,” the outlet’s report noted further.
But it gets worse: The outlet noted that the two phony doctors, whose accounts continually urged caution about COVID-19 and pushed for lockdowns, masking, business closures, etc., were part of a larger network of at least four fake accounts that promoted alleged ties to the LGBTQ community. The accounts also posted heated criticisms of anyone who was viewed as not taking the pandemic seriously enough or who pushed back on the tyrannical measures.
And interestingly enough, the scam was uncovered by a liberal writer.
“The fake doctors were uncovered by Joshua Gutterman Tranen, a self-described “gay writer” pursuing a master’s of fine arts at Bennington College. He saw Robert Honeyman’s tweet about their husband being in a coma, noticed people he followed also followed them, and thought that they might be part of the LGBTQ+ academic community,” the outlet reported.
“But after 10 minutes of googling, Gutterman Tranen concluded that Robert Honeyman’s photo was a stock image and their biography stretched boundaries of believability: an academic who left no traces on academic websites and had lost two family members to Covid in late 2022, despite masking and distancing,” the report stated.
Once again, social media was being used to push lies, false narratives, and propaganda, proving once again that the big tech companies are no doubt tied to the American deep state.
Sources include:
In another case of yesterday’s conspiracy theory becoming today’s fact, mainstream media is finally reporting on what we have known all along. Biden, Fauci and Gates have been sharing misinformation with us. There was no “winter of severe illness and death” for the unvaccinated.
In reality, this is a pandemic of the vaccinated.
Official investigations are being launched and lawsuits are being readied. But before we get to that, let’s take a look at an incredible phenomenon occurring closer to home. In the US, mainstream media outlets are beginning to quietly and tentatively report on the truth.
https://www.rt.com/news/568313-uk-nhs-warns-cancer-crisis/
Dec 15, 2022
© Getty Images/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY
Britain is in the midst of a major healthcare crisis as months-long delays in cancer treatment have become increasingly commonplace, leading to higher mortality, the National Health Service (NHS) has warned.
On Wednesday, several British media outlets cited recent NHS figures, which showed that nearly 40% of all cancer patients urgently referred by their GP in October had to wait two months before receiving treatment. This is said to be the second-worst performance on record and well short of the 15% target.
The Guardian quoted doctors as saying that a mere four-week delay in cancer treatment “increases mortality by between 6% and 13% for solid cancers, with further increases if the delay is longer.”
Meanwhile, according to an article published in the Lancet Oncology journal, there has been a 17% rise in UK cancer deaths caused by delays in diagnosis and treatment since the Covid-19 pandemic. This is believed to have contributed considerably to the breakdown of cancer treatment practices in the country.
Clinicians from Imperial College London, the Institute of Cancer Policy at King’s College, Radiotherapy UK, and Check4Cancer have called for immediate action to tackle the crisis.
READ MORE: Mental health issues rising among youth in England
Oncologist and founder of the CatchUpWithCancer campaign, Professor Pat Price, characterized the current situation as a “watershed moment for UK cancer services – the biggest cancer crisis ever.” He also warned that Britain “can’t accept the normalization of record-breaking cancer treatment waiting times.”
Other healthcare professionals noted that the “NHS and frontline staff need the same urgency and leadership, combined with the authority to work through obstructive bureaucracy, that was given to the Covid-19 vaccine taskforce.”
A 2021 report cited staff shortages and a lack of diagnostic tools, especially in the areas of radiology and pathology, among the main reasons for the current state of affairs.
In order to turn the tide, doctors called on the NHS to find ways to retain staff and “give them the tools and support they need to do their jobs.”
Special emphasis should be placed on investment in radiotherapy, which is said to be in danger of collapse in Britain.
Meanwhile, an NHS spokesperson told the media that the authorities are already “investing billions to expand diagnostic and treatment services to meet increased demand.”
#1 Mainstream media cannot be trusted
#2 Science has been bought
#3 The experimental jab is killing people
#4 The vaccinated should be quarantined
#5 Let us have a fine day anyway
“Last October, Malhotra urged for a suspension of the COVID-19 vaccines because a scientific paper has found that there is evidence the risk of harm is greater than any benefits from the vaccines.”
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-11-15-covid-vaccines-linked-to-sudden-deaths-mccullough.html
by: Zoey Sky
Tuesday, November 15, 2022
Renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough has warned that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines could be behind the “sudden and unexpected” cardiac events and deaths in otherwise healthy people.
In a video interview, McCullough explained that before Big Pharma started pushing the COVID-19 vaccines, athletes who suddenly died were usually diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (an abnormal thickening of the heart) or premature heart blockage.
However, athletes are now being thoroughly screened to rule out those conditions. McCullough also said that peer-reviewed literature has revealed that the coronavirus can cause myocarditis.
According to a U.K. study, at least 100 fatal cases of myocarditis were linked to the COVID-19 vaccine.
McCullough also referenced a case report published in the journal Archives of Pathology that discovered a link between the second dose of Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine and myocarditis in two adolescents.
In one case report by South Korean researchers, they reported the autopsy findings of a 22-year-old man who developed chest pain five days after receiving his first dose of the Pfizer vaccine. The man died seven hours later.
McCullough explained that if someone dies and the victim’s family or doctors don’t say anything, it’s reasonable to assume that the death may be linked to the COVID-19 vaccine until proven otherwise.
He added that as a cardiologist and scientist, his goal isn’t to scare the public. He considers his advice as “more of a public warning” because there is a “strong signal for sudden death that’s almost certainly due to subclinical or clinical myocarditis.”
The two emerging patterns of “sudden death” are that it usually happens during a cardio-intensive sporting event or during sleep. During both cases, the patient experiences a surge of adrenaline that helps their body naturally during these periods.
However, adrenaline also seems to be a trigger for the arrhythmias.
The natural biochemical change toward the end of the sleep cycle signals your body to wake up, added McCullough. Similarly, catecholamines, the hormones produced by the adrenal glands, are released in response to physical exertion or emotional stress.
Catecholamines can stress your heart and cause it to beat arrhythmically. Unfortunately, if there is also inflammation and scarring, the mechanism can cause death.
McCullough said this suggests that the COVID-19 vaccine may be linked to these cases of sudden death. (Related: Dr. Peter McCullough: One COVID vaccine death is too many.)
McCullough said that coronavirus vaccines “have surpassed any guardrails for safety” so they all need to be pulled off the market and that vaccine mandates must be rescinded.
He also highlighted the fact that in many news stories of sudden deaths, the vaccine status isn’t reported. He encouraged the victim’s families to help by indicating if they did or didn’t take COVID-19 vaccines prior to their deaths.
He referenced one case involving the 17-year-old daughter of Illinois Rep. Sean Casten who died in her sleep this June.
While Casten indicated in a Twitter post before her death that his daughter had been fully vaccinated, the family released a statement saying, “We don’t know what caused the arrhythmia, and likely never will.”
Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a top London cardiologist who was one of the first to take the COVID-19 vaccine and promote it on British television, is now warning his colleagues and the public that he has evidence linking “sudden deaths” to the vaccines.
Malhotra posted a video on Twitter that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is possibly the “primary cause in all unexpected cardiac arrests, heart attacks, strokes, cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure since 2021, until proven otherwise.”
Last October, Malhotra urged for a suspension of the COVID-19 vaccines because a scientific paper has found that there is evidence the risk of harm is greater than any benefits from the vaccines.
Visit Vaccines.news for more articles about the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines.
Watch the video below as Dr. Peter McCullough talks about the skyrocketing cases of myocarditis in children who received the COVID-19 vaccine.
https://www.brighteon.com/embed/1ea36df8-7b73-4f00-8f0d-b0fd6efaeddb
This video is from the Prevent Global Genocide channel on Brighteon.com.
Mass die-off happening now: Close to 26,000 excess deaths recorded in England and Wales since April.
700 million people will DIE from COVID injections, says Dr. David Martin.
Sources include:
by: Arsenio Toledo
Friday, November 11, 2022
The miscarriage rate among Australian women who are fully vaccinated against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is 75 percent, or five times greater than the 15 percent miscarriage rate for the rest of the population.
This is according to former Member of Parliament (MP) George Christensen, who discussed this grave matter in an interview with Alex Jones on “The Alex Jones Show” of InfoWars. (Related: “COVID” deaths hit new record in hyper-vaccinated Australia.)
According to Christensen, who is quoting the Australian Bureau of Statistics, every month there are roughly 23,000 to 25,000 births. But this data only goes up to Oct. 2021. Since then, the number of children born each month has been dropping.
In Nov. 2021, Christensen noted that only around 18,000 children were born – or a 25 percent drop – and then in December of that year, the number of births dropped even further to less than 7,000. Similarly, dour numbers can be found in the succeeding months, which could explain why the Australian government has been reluctant to release official statistics from last year.
Christensen even quoted a doctor he knows who works in a specialist fertility clinic in Brisbane and noted that the baseline miscarriage rate among women who have been trying to conceive for over 12 months is around 13 to 15 percent.
But when the vaccine began being distributed, that doctor saw the miscarriage rate jump from around 15 percent to nearly 50 percent.
“He dug into the data a bit deeper … and what he found was, when he separated the vaccinated from the non-vaccinated patient … amongst the unvaccinated, it was the normal 15 percent miscarriage rate,” said Christensen. “Amongst the vaccinated women, that miscarriage rate went up to 75 percent.”
John Aitken, widely recognized as one of the world’s leading experts on sperm biology and fertilization, noted that Australia is becoming more and more dependent on assisted conception therapies, which is indicative of a major fertility crisis in the country.
Aitken noted that approximately 20,000 Australian women in their early 40s undertake in-vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy each year, with less than five percent resulting in pregnancy.
Even before taking vaccinations into account, Aitken noted that one of the big drivers of the infertility crisis is the fact that women are more likely to put off having children until their early 30s or even up to their 40s. He added that the average age of women in IVF clinics is now 37 years old.
“We can do many things in modern industrialized society, but the one thing we cannot do is change our biology because we stop reproducing in midlife,” said Aitken. “People are just leaving it too late to have their families.”
Men are also having trouble getting their spouses pregnant. In 2020, male infertility was linked to about one-third of all IVF cycles failing. No analysis has been conducted since then, but given that less than five percent of all IVF cycles successfully result in a pregnancy, it is very likely that more and more men are becoming infertile the more prevalent the COVID-19 vaccine becomes in Australia.
Without significant changes, the country’s modern economy could head toward an “infertility trap,” with the country’s replacement rate being artificially propped up with looser immigration policies to make up for the shortfall of citizen birthrates.
“We need to wake up to our own biology,” said Aitken. “This is something that can’t be changed. We need to change the social structures around it rather than trying to force the reverse.”
More stories about vaccine-related injuries and deaths can be found at VaccineHolocaust.org.
Watch Alex Jones’ full interview with former Australian MP George Christensen regarding the rise in miscarriage rates among the vaccinated.
https://www.brighteon.com/embed/b53f1962-f0a0-4b84-b94e-4523ec4d97bf
This video is from the InfoWars channel on Brighteon.com.
HOLOCAUST OF THE UNBORN: Babies are DYING because their mothers got “vaccinated” for COVID.
COVID jabs destroy sperm motility, cause spontaneous abortions, damage women’s ovaries.
Study: Women are more likely to suffer from COVID-19 vaccine injuries than men.
Sources include:
Processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco are the three main suspects.
Articles: https://www.everydayhealth.com/cancer…
https://dentistry.co.uk/2022/11/07/mo…
https://www.nature.com/articles/s4157…
Tales from the Conspiratum 
