“The evidence is in. Governors, journalists, scientists, university presidents, hospital administrators and business leaders can continue to follow Dr. Anthony Fauci or open their eyes. After 700,000-plus COVID deaths and the devastating effects of lockdowns, it is time to return to basic principles of public health.”
Corruption
Last summer, the WHO, an avid protector of the Chinese government, made a sharp change in attitude by admitting the possibility of a lab leak. A Senate Committee on Health Education, Labor, and Pensions noted last fall, “substantial evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a research-related incident associated with a laboratory in Wuhan.”
BY TYLER DURDEN
SUNDAY, FEB 26, 2023
The argument that Covid-19 leaked from the virology lab in Wuhan, China (the only Level 4 lab in Asia) is growing louder after years of Big Tech and governments censoring the Covid debate.
Last summer, the WHO, an avid protector of the Chinese government, made a sharp change in attitude by admitting the possibility of a lab leak. A Senate Committee on Health Education, Labor, and Pensions noted last fall, “substantial evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a research-related incident associated with a laboratory in Wuhan.” The FBI and other intelligence agencies have also investigated the Wuhan Lab.
The latest US agency to embrace the lab leak idea is the Energy Department, the Wall Street Journal reported Sunday, citing a classified intelligence report provided to the White House and top members of Congress.
Sources told WSJ, “the Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a laboratory leak.”
The Energy Department had an undecided stance on the virus’ origins. The conclusion is due to new intelligence, but the department hedged itself by indicating “low confidence” in its latest opinion, according to people who have read the classified report.
The agency joins the FBI in expressing the opinion the virus’ origins are due to a Chinese lab leak. WSJ noted four other agencies and a national intelligence panel still believe the virus was likely the result of natural transmission, and two are undecided.
The Energy Department’s report is important because the agency supervises the US national laboratories, some of which are Level 4 labs.
US officials wouldn’t shed more color on why the Energy Department changed its views on the origins of Covid. They said the agency and FBI have come to the same conclusions for different reasons.
After the pandemic struck, the mainstream media and Big Tech social media platforms labeled anyone as a “conspiracy theorist” for even mentioning the lab leak origin.
Recall Zero Hedge was banned from Twitter in February 2020 after we “published an article linking a Chinese scientist to the outbreak of the fast-spreading coronavirus.”
It was later revealed that left-wing faux-news site BuzzFeed had complained to Twitter about Zero Hedge supposedly releasing “the personal information of a scientist from Wuhan,” but all we had done was print information that was publicly available and ask questions about whether a lab leak may have been plausible than the seafood market. Three years later, our questioning appears to have been correct so far.
A recent Twitter Files drop has shown the incestuous relationship between Big Tech and the government rigging the debate around Covid origins.
… and even reporters have asked Anthony Fauci questions about the origins.
The complex narrative that governments, non-governmental organizations, Big Tech, and mainstream media built around Covid with shaky assumptions and misdirections is falling apart — hence the latest pivot by the Energy Department.
It’s a little surprising that 67% of Canadians polled by Leger for the National Post agree with the statement, “It feels like everything is broken in this country right now.”
https://www.sott.net/article/477161-Poll-reveals-dark-mood-of-Canadians
Feb 7, 2023
Poll reveals dark mood of Canadians
Lorne Gunter
Toronto Sun
Tue, 07 Feb 2023
It’s a little surprising that 67% of Canadians polled by Leger for the National Post agree with the statement, “It feels like everything is broken in this country right now.”
That’s a variation on the common poll question, “Is the country headed in the wrong direction?” and I have seldom seen a negative answer so high.
It might even be doubly surprising because the “Canada is broken” mantra is closely aligned with Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre. For a lot of poll respondents, agreeing that the country is dysfunctional is equivalent to admitting they kind of, sort of think Poilievre might be onto something.
But what is really, truly surprising is that the most pessimistic Canadians are women and younger people, not grumpy, old men.
Women think Canada is broken more than men do, by a margin of 70% to 64%, just as Canadians under 55 are even more pessimistic than those over 55 – 72% to 61%.
Totally unsurprising is the fact that Westerners are more convinced Canada is a mess than are the residents of other regions. Given that the Trudeau government goes out of its way to anger and repress the West, it’s consistent that nearly three-quarters of Manitobans, Saskatchewanians and Albertans feel the country isn’t working.
Even the most optimistic Canadians, Quebecers, are still 59% in a dark mood.
(The irony in that number is that the most-contented Canadians – or the least-discontented – are residents of the province that is the least committed to Confederation. Although maybe that’s not ironic given how vigorously the Trudeau government panders to the PM’s home province.)
Leger found Canadians’ top concerns were inflation and health care – two issues that have direct impact on most people’s lives. Sixty-eight per cent find inflation a growing burden, while 59 per cent are concerned about the state of health care. Will there be a doctor or ER or hospital bed if they need one?
Many health-care workers will say privately that now is not a good time to get into an accident or catch a bad flu.
But what must truly keep politicians up at night are respondents’ answers to whether governments are doing enough to solve these problems. On both subjects, only about a quarter think Canadian leaders are taking their concerns seriously.
For the federal Liberals, who cling to minority power by their fingernails (and thanks the toadying submission of Jagmeet Singh and the NDP), this disconnect must cause their strategists heart palpitations.
Justin Trudeau swept to power in 2015 largely because voters thought he and the Liberals were more in touch with, as the saying goes, where they lived and with what was important to them.
Now Trudeau and the Liberals appear to be about as out-of-touch with ordinary voters as any government I can remember.
Fewer than half of voters for whom inflation and health care are top-of-mind think the Liberals are doing enough. It’s bad enough for politicians when voters think leaders don’t understand them on esoteric issues, such as foreign relations and tax policy. But when elected officials come to be seen as out-of-touch on basic, pocketbook issues, it usually spells doom to their re-election.
The Liberals have avoided defeat in the last two elections despite a ream of scandals, such as blackface, WE Charities and SNC-Lavalin, because a tiny plurality of voters still perceived them as the party that cared most.
But what does it mean for the Liberals’ fortunes if that is no longer true – if they are the party defending against a popular perception that the country has become “broken” while they were in charge.
No wonder the Liberals are in full divide-and-conquer mode, pressing hard on every wedge issue they can in an attempt to sneak back into office one more time.
Top Thai officials are pulling off their gloves against Pfizer Bio N Tech and could become the first country in the world to Nullify the contracts between the government and Pfizer. This would mean Pfizer would have to pay back billions of dollars because of their jabs to the Thai people.
By Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Prof Michel Chossudovsky, and Redacted
Global Research, February 04, 2023
“On December 15, about three weeks after her third Pfizer booster shot, Princess Bajrakitiyabha Narendira Debyavati collapsed with heart issues and went into a coma.
“The 44-year-old eldest daughter of the King in Thailand, and likely heir to the throne, had reported to be in excellent health prior to the vaccination and collapsed while training her dogs.
The media seemed to generally lose interest after a January 9 update in which it was reported the princess remained in a coma and, according to the palace, has now been diagnosed with “severe heart arrhythmia resulting from inflammation following a mycoplasma infection.
One authority recently suggested that Thailand was preparing to declare its contracts for Pfizer vaccine “null and void” and go after the vaccine maker for damages.
Propagandists in the media have launched into overdrive to try to discredit such news and to claim “no evidence” of a vaccine tie to the sudden illness of the princess (without mentioning that there is no evidence exonerating the vaccine, either).
Google and other Big Tech companies, as well as their “fact-checkers” have repeatedly disseminated disinformation and censored accurate information on Covid and vaccines on behalf of vaccine industry interests.” (Sheryl Attikson)
“One daughter of the present king Rama X collapsed and is in a coma… within 23 days after the third shot, 44 years old, never been seriously ill, collapsed and is now in a coma.
The diagnosis that was given by the authorities and by the university is so ridiculous – she’s supposed to have a bacterial infection that will never do what she suffered from.
And so we are determined, and the activists in Thailand who have been on this many many months now – great guys, also a professor from the University of Bangkok, he’s gotten in touch with the Royal Family, and we are sending information to the Royal Family to alert them to the fact that in all probability the princess is suffering as a victim of this jab, as so many people around the world have been suffering.
Sucharit Bhakdi, fmr. professor of microbiology at University of Mainz, Germany
Top Thai officials are pulling off their gloves against Pfizer Bio N Tech and could become the first country in the world to Nullify the contracts between the government and Pfizer.
This would mean Pfizer would have to pay back billions of dollars because of their jabs to the Thai people.
Video
Comment by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky
Our thoughts are with Thailand’s Princess Bajrakitiyabha
A decision by Thailand to repeal its contractual relationship with Pfizer has to be carefully thought out. What we are dealing with on the part of Pfizer is a criminal endeavor applied Worldwide.
The Royal Thai Government should “nullify” its contracts with Pfizer while contemplating a formal criminal legal procedure against Pfizer, (which incidentally already has a criminal record for fraudulent marketing with the US Department of Justice) (2009).
We are no longer in the realm of “fraudulent marketing”.
The vaccine was launched in mid-December 2020. A Confidential Report by Pfizer released under Freedom of Information in October 2021, confirms unequivocally based on data recorded from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 that the vaccine is a toxic substance resulting in mortality and morbidity.
The Report is now in the public domain. It should be consulted by the Royal Thai Government:
“Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.”
The evidence is overwhelming. The data compiled from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 unequivocally confirms “Manslaughter”. Based on that evidence, Pfizer had the responsibility to immediately cancel and withdraw the “vaccine”.
Pfizer’s Worldwide marketing of the Covid-19 Vaccine beyond February 28th, 2021, is no longer an “Act of Manslaughter”.
Murder as opposed to Manslaughter implies “Criminal Intent”.
Pfizer’s Covid 19 Vaccine constitutes a Criminal Act. From a legal standpoint, it is an “Act of Murder” applied Worldwide to a target population of 8 billion people. It’s a multibillion-dollar project.
What is contained in Pfizer’s “confidential” report is detailed evidence of the impacts of the “vaccine” on mortality and morbidity.
This data which emanates from the “Horse’s Mouth” can be used to confront as well as formulate criminal legal procedures against Pfizer.
See the detailed articles below
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, January 31, 2023
See also
Bombshell Document Dump on Pfizer Vaccine Data
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, April 29, 2022
Among all major Big Pharma actors, Pfizer has a criminal record in the U.S. (2009 DoD Judgment)
Video: Pfizer Has a Criminal Record. Is It Relevant?
The Pfizer Confidential Document
Click here to Access the Pfizer 5.3.6 Document
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Prof Michel Chossudovsky, and Redacted, Global Research, 2023
According to congressionally passed statutes, research of active laws, and extra details obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the Department of Defense owns, implements, and oversees the COVID-19 vaccine program as a “Countermeasure” to foreign attack. While the public was bombarded with an orchestrated fear campaign, the U.S. Government managed the Covid response as a national security threat.
“They put the National Security Council in charge and treated it as an act of war,” said Latypova.
Department of Defense, BARDA, and HHS ordered all Covid countermeasures, including “vaccines” as prototype demonstrations of large-scale manufacturing, avoiding regulations and transparency under Other Transaction Authority. As prototypes used under EUA during PHE, Covid countermeasures, including “vaccines,” need not comply with the U.S. laws for manufacturing quality, safety, and labelling.
A significant information operation was set in motion the minute COVID-19 hit. The U.S. government, the intelligence community, the media, and Big Tech colluded to orchestrate and implement an intense pressure campaign designed to get the vaccine legally designated under the Emergency Use Authorization Act while vilifying dissenting doctors, critics, and viable alternative treatments. This designation allowed for speedy manufacturing devoid of the standard safety and public health protocols.
Global Research, February 05, 2023
Armed Forces Press 5 January 2023
Region: USA
Theme: Intelligence, Science and Medicine
***
The following article was first published by the Armed Forces Press on January 5, 2022
***
According to congressionally passed statutes, research of active laws, and extra details obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the Department of Defense owns, implements, and oversees the COVID-19 vaccine program as a “Countermeasure” to foreign attack. While the public was bombarded with an orchestrated fear campaign, the U.S. Government managed the Covid response as a national security threat.
The research and documents were obtained by a former executive of a pharmaceutical Contract Research Organization (CRO), Sasha Latypova, and intensive legal researcher Katherine Watt.
The Three-Legged Stool
Hello whyThe undercover operation was orchestrated utilizing three critical legal maneuvers:
1. Emergency Use Authorization EUA.
2. Prep Act,
3. Other Transactions Authority
President Trump declared a Public Health Emergency (PHE) on March 13, 2020, under the Stafford Act, putting the National Security Council in charge of the Covid policy.Covid-19 vaccines are “medical countermeasures” – a grey area of products that are not regulated as vaccines or medicines.
“They put the National Security Council in charge and treated it as an act of war,” said Latypova.
According to Operation Warp Speed/ASPR reports, the DoD ordered, oversaw, and tightly managed the development, manufacture, and distribution of Covid countermeasures, mainly utilizing the DoD’s previously established network of military contractors and consortia.
Department of Defense, BARDA, and HHS ordered all Covid countermeasures, including “vaccines” as prototype demonstrations of large-scale manufacturing, avoiding regulations and transparency under Other Transaction Authority. As prototypes used under EUA during PHE, Covid countermeasures, including “vaccines,” need not comply with the U.S. laws for manufacturing quality, safety, and labelling.
“The implication is that the U.S. Government authorized and funded the deployment of noncompliant biological materials on Americans without clarifying their “prototype” legal status, making the materials not subject to normal regulatory oversight, all while maintaining a fraudulent pseudo- “regulatory” presentation to the public,” said Latypova.
“Most incredible is the fact that current Laws enacted by the United States Congress appear to make the coverup actions LEGAL!”
Under the PHE, medical countermeasures are not regulated or safeguarded as pharmaceutical products (21 USC 360bbb-3(k).
The American people were led to believe that the FDA, CDC, and figureheads like Anthony Fauci oversaw the COVID-19 vaccine program.
Their involvement was an orchestrated information operation. All decisions concerning the COVID-19 vaccine research, materials acquisition, distribution, and information sharing were tightly controlled by the DoD.
Hundreds of Covid countermeasures contracts have been uncovered. Many disclosures are in redacted form. However, Latypova and Watt have found sources to fill in the details.
A review of these contracts indicates a high degree of control by the U.S. Government (DoD/BARDA). It specifies the scope of deliverables as “demonstrations” and “prototypes” only while excluding clinical trials and manufacturing quality control from the scope of work paid for by the contracts. To ensure that the Pharma is free to conduct the fake clinical trials without financial risk, the contracts include the removal of all liability for the manufacturers and any contractors along the supply and distribution chain under the 2005 PREP Act and related federal legislation.
Why is no action by regulators or courts?
According to Latypova and Watt, a combination of recently passed legislation and executive orders make it LEGAL to LIE! The HHS Secretary is accountable to no one if the Health National Emergency continues to be extended by Congress every three months.
A significant information operation was set in motion the minute COVID-19 hit. The U.S. government, the intelligence community, the media, and Big Tech colluded to orchestrate and implement an intense pressure campaign designed to get the vaccine legally designated under the Emergency Use Authorization Act while vilifying dissenting doctors, critics, and viable alternative treatments. This designation allowed for speedy manufacturing devoid of the standard safety and public health protocols.
For a vaccine to receive designation under the EUA, there can be no other known treatments or cures. Therefore, many proven treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were blacklisted in the media and dismissed as “horse dewormers” when these cheap, readily available drugs were in the past heralded for their effectiveness.
Eminent COVID-treating doctors such as Peter M. McCullough and Pierre Kory have faced unprecedented attacks on their medical credentials.
“I believed that the authorities responded to the largest public health crisis of our lives with compassion, diligence, and scientific expertise,” Bass writes. “I was wrong. We in the scientific community were wrong. And it cost lives.”
“I can see now that the scientific community from the CDC to the WHO to the FDA and their representatives, repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public about its own views and policies, including on natural vs. artificial immunity, school closures and disease transmission, aerosol spread, mask mandates, and vaccine effectiveness and safety, especially among the young. All of these were scientific mistakes at the time, not in hindsight. Amazingly, some of these obfuscations continue to the present day.”
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-02-05-newsweek-we-were-wrong-covid.html
by: Ethan Huff
Sunday, February 05, 2023
A seventh-year student at a medical school in Texas penned an op-ed for Newsweek this week calling out the establishment for imposing lockdowns, masks, “vaccines” and booster shots, and other unscientific, life-destroying tyranny in the name of fighting covid.
Kevin Bass, a medical student and researcher, says he initially supported the government’s covid fascism. He believed it was the right thing to do in order to save lives, but now believes the exact opposite.
“I believed that the authorities responded to the largest public health crisis of our lives with compassion, diligence, and scientific expertise,” Bass writes. “I was wrong. We in the scientific community were wrong. And it cost lives.”
“I can see now that the scientific community from the CDC to the WHO to the FDA and their representatives, repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public about its own views and policies, including on natural vs. artificial immunity, school closures and disease transmission, aerosol spread, mask mandates, and vaccine effectiveness and safety, especially among the young. All of these were scientific mistakes at the time, not in hindsight. Amazingly, some of these obfuscations continue to the present day.”
Are the powers that be now openly admitting they were wrong to try to avoid paying the price for their crimes against humanity?
For whatever reason, Bass just believed everything that Tony Fauci and other authorities were declaring at the time as solutions to the covid virus, which to this day, just to clarify, has still never been isolated and proven to exist.
Now, though, Bass admits that the entire approach the scientific community took to address covid was “inherently flawed … and continues to be.” And these inherent flaws, he says, resulted “in thousands if not millions of preventable deaths.”
“What we did not properly appreciate is that preferences determine how scientific expertise is used, and that our preferences might be – indeed, our preferences were – very different from many of the people that we serve,” he explains.
“We created policy based on our preferences, then justified it using data. And then we portrayed those opposing our efforts as misguided, ignorant, selfish, and evil.”
Why this sudden change in belief? It could be because the entire world is waking up to the fact that the “vaccines” are a sham – and a deadly one, at that. Hundreds of millions of Americans let themselves get jabbed based on the inherently flawed consensus of the scientific community, of which Bass is a part.
These people’s inherently flawed beliefs at the start of the scamdemic destroyed so many lives that people are now demanding that heads roll. So, in an attempt to save themselves from the fallow, the Kevin Basses of the world are finally relenting to the fact that they were wrong in the hopes that the court of public opinion will deliver a non-guilty verdict and let their crimes against humanity slide.
Bass’s op-ed is shockingly admissive, and the fact that Newsweek even published it at all is telling. The narrative is shifting to where everyone, regardless of what “side” they are on, is reaching a common understanding that what happened during covid can never be allowed to happen again.
“My motivation for writing this is simple: It’s clear to me that for public trust to be restored in science, scientists should publicly discuss what went right and what went wrong during the pandemic, and where we could have done better,” Bass concludes.
“It’s OK to be wrong and admit where one was wrong and what one learned. That’s a central part of the way science works. Yet I fear that many are too entrenched in groupthink – and too afraid to publicly take responsibility – to do this.”
More covid-related news can be found at Plague.info.
Sources for this article include:
Alexandra Latypova – PANDEMIC STRATEGIES, LESSONS AND CONSEQUENCES, 21st- 22nd January 2023
The Biden regime is willing to escalate war with Russia to protect criminal operations in Ukraine
by: Lance D Johnson
Sunday, February 05, 2023
The US government continues to escalate world war with Russia, while contributing to the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine. The Biden regime has sent over $100+ billion to Ukraine, including a variety of munitions and weapons, with plans to send tanks, jets, and other weapons, with no resolve. The US, going out of their way to “protect” Ukraine, is clearly not seeking a peace treaty or any other measure of resolve. Any negotiations have been arrogant and escalatory. At times, the Biden regime has even threatened nuclear war with Russia, while treacherously guiding NATO into world war with Russia and China.
US spending hundreds of $ billions in Ukraine, with no exit plan
It is now apparent that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy seeks unlimited funds for war and looks to protect the corrupt empire of oligarchs installed by the Bidens and Clintons over the past seventeen years. These corrupt, establishment politicians will do anything they can to protect their assets (biolabs) and conceal their military operations in Ukraine, with no regard to the lives they destroy in the process.
In 2005, former Senators Barack Obama and Richard Lugar traveled to Ukraine and visited former Soviet biological and chemical weapons facilities. According to the Washington Post, the labs were part of a “Cold War network of ‘antiplague’ stations that supplied highly lethal pathogens to Soviet bioweapons factories.” These facilities were decommissioned after the Soviet Union was dissolved. But in the 21st century, the United States was allowed to go into Ukraine and re-establish this network of biolabs. In fact, the US and Ukraine signed a pact, clearing the way for the Ukrainian government to receive US taxpayer funds to improve security at these facilities and retain dangerous work on pathogens of pandemic potential. This pact was advertised to the public as a way “to prevent the spread of biological weapons.” Ironically, when the labs were in the hands of Russian scientists, they were deemed dangerous “bioweapon facilities.”
Under the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 2005, the US seized Soviet labs and took possession of dangerous bioweapons research, under the pretense of destroying stockpiles of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons in Ukraine. Meanwhile, the US justifies its gain-of-function and “directed evolution” research on viruses around the world, and lies about their government’s involvement in bioweapons research.
The Biden regime is willing to escalate war with Russia to protect criminal operations in Ukraine
In February of 2014, under the supervision of the Obama Administration, the lawless land of Ukraine broke out in Civil War. The CIA and US State Department (under Hillary Clinton) took full control over the Ukraine government and assisted in a regime change. Victoria Nuland, the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, testified at a US Senate hearing that the Ukrainian biolabs do exist, and she is worried the contents of the lab will fall into the hands of the Russians. Nuland was the mastermind who engineered the Color Revolution in Ukraine during the regime change that took place under Obama/Clinton. Then Vice President Joe Biden took advantage of the regime change and traveled to the country over thirteen times. The “Big Guy” sent US taxpayer funds over to Ukraine to embolden Ukrainian oligarchs. Anyone who spoke out about the Biden’s kick-back/money laundering scheme in Ukraine, was immediately fired.
The FBI and DHS commanded Big Tech to censor all investigative reporting on biolabs in Ukraine, US involvement in gain-of-function virology research, and the truth about vaccines, because the intelligence community is clearly controlled by the same people who are profiteering off of bioweapons development and human suffering, whether through predatory vaccine and diagnostic programs or through direct exploitation of populations with enhanced pathogens, the censorship of medical treatments, or a global medical police state.
The corrupt, criminal forces behind Ukrainian biolabs grow violently defensive when investigation is near
The darkest elements of the intelligence community and the DNC were quick to impeach President Donald Trump over a phone call to Ukrainian President Zelenskyy back in 2019 because Trump was getting too close to their criminal operations. In the call, Trump asked Zelenskyy to look into a matter of corruption between Joe Biden and his son in Ukraine, which included Joe Biden publicly bragging about a prosecution that he stopped.
Zelenskyy ultimately failed to take any meaningful action against the Bidens. In fact, Zelenskyy eventually ordered the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense to destroy all state documents affiliated with US biolab companies Metabiota and Battelle, right before the Russians marched in on their special military mission in Ukraine. Apparently, Vladimir Putin was also getting too close to their criminal operations.
Metabiota is part of the Pentagon’s DRTA Program and is funded by Rosemont Seneca (Hunter Biden). This secretive company produces biological agents under diplomatic cover at biolabs in Ukraine. The company also sells pandemic insurance and trackers to help countries get ahead of what they are releasing to the population.
The World Health Organization also advised Ukraine to destroy all pathogens in the biolabs (the same biolabs that the corporate media pretended did not exist). Again, it was the WHO that created a global medical police state. Obviously, this globalist organization only seeks to protect the biolabs that give them power to terrorize and control the world.
In 2022, Russia’s Ambassador to the United Nations brought forth evidence at a UN Security Council, alleging that the US is operating at least thirty different biolabs in Ukraine, which contain enhancements on highly infectious bacteria strains, coronavirus, plague, and anthrax. The labs also use bats and fleas as vectors of disease spread. The US Embassy in Ukraine moved quickly to scrub evidence of thee biolabs from their site.
The corporate media in the US will not divulge any of these details because it is funded by the pharmaceutical companies that profit from predatory bioweapons and vaccine development. The corporate media has gone all in for Ukraine because the very existence of the pharmaceutical industry depends on the development of bioweapons, diagnostics, and so-called vaccines. The corrupt establishment politicians and their pharma overlords are only trying to protect their assets in Ukraine. They don’t care about the Ukrainian people.
Big Pharma, the corporate media, Big Tech, the darkest sects of the Intelligence Community, Zelensky and the corrupt Ukrainian puppet government, WHO, NIH, and other corrupt politicians connected to the Clintons/Bidens/Obama are all working together to protect their assets and criminal operations in Ukraine, while profiteering from the terror and control that ensues. Taxpayer funds, tanks, and munitions are being shipped to Ukraine by the billions to protect a corrupt empire of lies, a network of biolabs, and all the associated war crimes and crimes against humanity that have taken place over the past two decades.
Stay tuned at WWIII.News.
Sources include:
“You maybe heard about Brooke Jackson’s case in the US. She’s suing Pfizer under False Claims Act that they defrauded the government. Well, Pfizer already filed a motion to dismiss – the case hasn’t been dismissed yet – but Pfizer already in court stated that: ‘Please dismiss this case, Judge. We did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.”
BY RHODA WILSON
Feb 6, 2022
Listen to the article:
“[Pfizer] did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.” Sasha Latypova used these words to describe the basis on which Pfizer has requested the dismissal of a False Claims Act case brought against them for their covid “vaccines.”
The US Department of Defence ordered “demonstrations” from pharmaceutical companies using the same secretive framework they use to order weapons. While telling us they were pharmaceutical products, for legal reasons they described them as emergency use authorised “countermeasures.” No pharmaceutical regulation applies to countermeasures.
“They were claiming that they’re producing pharmaceutical products to the good manufacturing standards when they perfectly well knew, I assure you, they were all aware of this. They perfectly well knew that no pharmaceutical regulations apply to these things, countermeasures … They’re just lying to you that these are pharmaceuticals. They’re actually not,” Latypova explained.
The international conference ‘Pandemic Strategies: Lessons and Consequences’ held at the Stockholm Waterfront on 21-22 January 2023 gathered 15 leading doctors, researchers and lawyers from the US, Canada, UK, Germany, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Israel, Ukraine and Norway, along with 7 Swedes.
Presentations and panel discussions are being released in the order that they appeared on the program at a rate of 3 per day.
Alexandra “Sasha” Latypova was one of those who gave a presentation. She holds an MBA degree and is a former Pharmaceutical R&D Executive. Latypova has spent approximately 25 years in the pharmaceutical industry and has owned and managed several contract research organisations – conducting clinical trials for over 60 pharmaceutical clients worldwide. She became concerned about the irregularities, cover-up and apparent fraud relating to the extremely high number of deaths and injuries associated with the covid injection rollout.
In her presentation, she explained that her initial investigation was to look into the so-called covid vaccines’ compliance with good manufacturing practices. It is the practice required to conform to quality guidelines recommended by regulatory agencies and applies to drugs, food and other mass-produced products that are consumed. It is to ensure, for example, that if you buy your favourite beer today and then you go to the to buy it again a week from now or a month from now, your experience is the same. The same goes for medicines like Aspirin that you buy in a pharmacy. You don’t expect a product to be a thousand times different a week from now versus today.
“As a highly regulated industry, pharmaceutical manufacturers are supposed to comply with [good manufacturing practice]. And this means that the product that they claim that they make, with the ingredients that they claim that they make, is supposed to be in every vial, every shot, every pill, over and over and over again, and they should be almost identical to each other,” Latypova said.
In the first few months of her investigation, Latypova found evidence of “very bad manufacturing practices” in relation to the mRNA injections. “When I looked at the [ ] graph [of serious adverse events and deaths recorded in VAERS] for mRNA injections for the US, I found [the below]”
“[I’m] only looking at serious adverse events and deaths. There were almost no adverse events reported in some lots, and some lots had thousands and they had hundreds of deaths. And so, this is not a good manufacturing practice-compliant product at all,” said Latypova. “I’m not endorsing flu vaccines or any vaccines anymore, because until this is investigated fully, nobody should be taking anything. That’s my professional opinion.”
The above graph shows Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Moderna and Pfizer. Below is a graph for Moderna. The blue colour represents serious adverse events and the orange represents death post-vaccination. “A well-manufactured product should not look like this at all,” Latypova explained.
Explaining the significance of the lot labelled in the graph above, Latypova said:
“On January 18, Orange County, California Health Department flagged this particular lot of Moderna for what they called ‘excessive number of allergic reactions’. Nothing was done about it. The injections were not stopped. In fact, this lot was being sold all over the United States until it ran out in late March.
“And as you know, if there is salmonella in a salad, they will recall the entire product from all the shelves in the country. Right? That’s what you should do as a manufacturer. All manufacturers have systems to detect this. And the majority of recalls of products are voluntary because they don’t want this to happen.
“Yet [with this lot from Moderna], nobody stopped. Not the manufacturer, not the health authorities of Orange County, not the CDC, FDA, or whoever was supposed to monitor this, they continued selling this lot. It’s now associated with over 65 deaths in the US and over 3000 serious adverse events. So, after something like this happens, everything that follows is intentional.”
Every researcher that has questioned or challenged regulatory authorities has been told: “We looked at it. It’s safe and effective. Go get vaccinated.” Why were they all behaving this way? Why are they all following the same script the world over?
Latypova has been collaborating with legal researcher Katherine Watt, who publishes articles on a Substack page titled ‘Bailiwick News’, to reveal the legal structure – or rather the pseudo-legal structure as it’s not lawful – of this government, pharma, military criminal cartel. “It actually is operating all over the world,” Latypova said.
In the 1960s a contracting framework was put into place for NASA called ‘Other Transaction Authority’. “Now eleven federal agencies use it. [The] Department of Defence is a particularly huge user of this contracting method because it allows them to contract without following any federal procurement rules and regulations with a lot of secrecy,” Latypova said. “They typically use this framework to order weapons from defence contractors, but now they’re using the same framework to order what they tell us is a pharmaceutical product.”
In addition to this, there is a US code, which Latypova highlights in her presentation, which says that the use of emergency use authorised “countermeasures” is not a clinical investigation under a public health emergency. The significance of this, Latypova explained, is that if a countermeasure cannot be a clinical investigational product, then no pharmaceutical regulation applies to these products.
“So, here’s the lie that our government told to us and told to the world and the governments all over the world repeated to their citizens:
“They were claiming that it’s a health event. They were claiming that they’re producing pharmaceutical products to the good manufacturing standards when they perfectly well knew, I assure you, they were all aware of this. They perfectly well knew that no pharmaceutical regulations apply to these things, countermeasures.
“They’re just lying to you that these are pharmaceuticals. They’re actually not … The government lied to us about this being a health event … [but] in reality, what they did, they organised the response to it as if it was war.”
Below is a slide from the presentation where the organisational structure of Operation Warp Speed was discussed. “The chief operating officer is the Department of Defence. We were told, ‘oh, they’re just doing logistics’. No, they’re not just doing logistics. They’re running the whole thing,” Latypova said.
As proof of this, Latypova cited the case where Pfizer or the FDA was refusing to release clinical trial data in less than 75 years.
“Who was arguing in court on behalf of Pfizer? Pfizer lawyers were not even in the room. It was the Department of Justice. So why is the US government defending presumably a private commercial interest of a pharmaceutical company?
“[In the slide above] you can see that the pharmaceutical companies are a third level down. They are not in charge, but they’re getting tremendous amounts of money to shut up and follow the orders and do as they’re told. [ ] The whole operation is run by the Department of Defence and the US government. I’m not absolving Pharma … of any responsibility. They are criminals in this cartel, and they’re collaborating, and they’re co-conspirators, and should be prosecuted together.”
In the same Operation Warp Speed presentation, Operation Warp Speed and BARDA were bragging about their vaccine manufacturing portfolio. On the right-hand side, they call it vaccine-supporting efforts. “These are all established defence contractors … who already had an established vaccine manufacturing base. At that time, it was called pan influenza. In early 2020, they simply switched to covid,” Latypova said. “These are the companies who are really making these products.”
“On [the left-hand] side, it’s called ‘Demo’. That’s what the government ordered, a demonstration, which is fake by definition … These words are very carefully designed. They have legal meaning, and that’s exactly what they bought. They bought demonstrations.”
They spent $47 billion on research and development contracts – $33 billion was spent on “vaccines.” All the contracts are publicly available HERE. All of them say the Department of Defence contracted these companies. And they’re managed through Advanced Technologies International, a long-standing contracts manager for the Department of Defence.
They exempt everyone who participates in this, regardless of where they’re working, as long as they’re following the orders, they’re exempt from liability under the Prep Act clause. That same Prep Act clause states that this is a dual-use civil and military application product. How they exempted themselves internationally is by Pfizer forcing countries to sign predatory contract clauses where the national governments had to lift good manufacturing practice requirements or any drug importation requirements and look the other way. Clauses that if, for example, Swedish citizens get injured and sue Pfizer, then the Swedish government has to indemnify Pfizer and put state assets such as military bases, embassies, and other state assets as collateral. “That’s because it’s the US government who wants that base, not the private commercial manufacturer,” Latypova explained.
“You maybe heard about Brooke Jackson’s case in the US. She’s suing Pfizer under False Claims Act that they defrauded the government. Well, Pfizer already filed a motion to dismiss – the case hasn’t been dismissed yet – but Pfizer already in court stated that: ‘Please dismiss this case, Judge. We did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.”
You can watch Latypova’s full presentation below.
https://rumble.com/embed/v25mv4v/?pub=4#?secret=LPY11zYJDCLakaruppropet: Covid-19 countermeasures: Evidence for an intent to harm, Alexandra Latypova (25 mins)
Scroll down
Watch before it’s pulled.
20 Jan 2023
Professor Clancy worked with Professor David Sackett, the founder of the modern evidence-based medicine movement, for over 4 years. Here we discuss the nature and importance of EBM and how this has been corrupted to the detriment of patient care.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/how-can-we-trust-institutions-lied
BY TYLER DURDEN
SATURDAY, JAN 14, 2023
Authored by Abir Ballan via The Brownstone Institute,
Trust the Authorities, trust the Experts, and trust the Science, we were told.
Public health messaging during the Covid-19 pandemic was only credible if it originated from government health authorities, the World Health Organization, and pharmaceutical companies, as well as scientists who parroted their lines with little critical thinking.
In the name of ‘protecting’ the public, the authorities have gone to great lengths, as described in the recently released Twitter Files (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) that document collusion between the FBI and social media platforms, to create an illusion of consensus about the appropriate response to Covid-19.
They suppressed ‘the truth,’ even when emanating from highly credible scientists, undermining scientific debate and preventing the correction of scientific errors. In fact, an entire bureaucracy of censorship has been created, ostensibly to deal with so-called MDM— misinformation (false information resulting from human error with no intention of harm); disinformation (information intended to mislead and manipulate); malinformation (accurate information intended to harm).
From fact-checkers like NewsGuard, to the European Commission’s Digital Services Act, the UK Online Safety Bill and the BBC Trusted News Initiative, as well as Big Tech and social media, all eyes are on the public to curtail their ‘mis-/dis-information.’
“Whether it’s a threat to our health or a threat to our democracy, there is a human cost to disinformation.” — Tim Davie, Director-General of the BBC
But is it possible that ‘trusted’ institutions could pose a far bigger threat to society by disseminating false information?
Although the problem of spreading false information is usually conceived of as emanating from the public, during the Covid-19 pandemic, governments, corporations, supranational organisations and even scientific journals and academic institutions have contributed to a false narrative.
Falsehoods such as ‘Lockdowns save lives’ and ‘No one is safe until everyone is safe’ have far-reaching costs in livelihoods and lives. Institutional false information during the pandemic was rampant. Below is just a sample by way of illustration.
The health authorities falsely convinced the public that the Covid-19 vaccines stop infection and transmission when the manufacturers never even tested these outcomes. The CDC changed its definition of vaccination to be more ‘inclusive’ of the novel mRNA technology vaccines. Instead of the vaccines being expected to produce immunity, now it was good enough to produce protection.
The authorities also repeated the mantra (at 16:55) of ‘safe and effective’ throughout the pandemic despite emerging evidence of vaccine harm. The FDA refused the full release of documents they had reviewed in 108 days when granting the vaccines emergency use authorisation. Then in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, it attempted to delay their release for up to 75 years. These documents presented evidence of vaccine adverse events. It’s important to note that between 50 and 96 percent of the funding of drug regulatory agencies around the world comes from Big Pharma in the form of grants or user fees. Can we disregard that it’s difficult to bite the hand that feeds you?
The vaccine manufacturers claimed high levels of vaccine efficacy in terms of relative risk reduction (between 67 and 95 percent). They failed, however, to share with the public the more reliable measure of absolute risk reduction that was only around 1 percent, thereby exaggerating the expected benefit of these vaccines.
They also claimed “no serious safety concerns observed” despite their own post-authorisation safety report revealing multiple serious adverse events, some lethal. The manufacturers also failed to publicly address the immune suppression during the two weeks post-vaccination and the rapidly waning vaccine effectiveness that turns negative at 6 months or the increased risk of infection with each additional booster. Lack of transparency about this vital information denied people their right to informed consent.
They also claimed that natural immunity is not protective enough and that hybrid immunity (a combination of natural immunity and vaccination) is required. This false information was necessary to sell remaining stocks of their products in the face of mounting breakthrough cases (infection despite vaccination).
In reality, although natural immunity may not completely prevent future infection with SARS-CoV-2, it is however effective in preventing severe symptoms and deaths. Thus vaccination post-natural infection is not needed.
The WHO also participated in falsely informing the public. It disregarded its own pre-pandemic plans, and denied that lockdowns and masks are ineffective at saving lives and have a net harm on public health. It also promoted mass vaccination in contradiction to the public health principle of ‘interventions based on individual needs.’
It also went as far as excluding natural immunity from its definition of herd immunity and claimed that only vaccines can help reach this end point. This was later reversed under pressure from the scientific community. Again, at least 20 percent of the WHO’s funding comes from Big Pharma and philanthropists invested in pharmaceuticals. Is this a case of he who pays the piper calls the tune?
The Lancet, a respectable medical journal, published a paper claiming that Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) — a repurposed drug used for the treatment of Covid-19 — was associated with a slight increased risk of death. This led the FDA to ban the use of HCQ to treat Covid-19 patients and the NIH to halt the clinical trials on HCQ as a potential Covid-19 treatment. These were drastic measures taken on the basis of a study that was later retracted due to the emergence of evidence showing that the data used was false.
In another instance, the medical journal Current Problems in Cardiology retracted —without any justification— a paper showing an increased risk of myocarditis in young people following the Covid-19 vaccines, after it was peer-reviewed and published. The authors advocated for the precautionary principle in the vaccination of young people and called for more pharmacovigilance studies to assess the safety of the vaccines. Erasing such findings from the medical literature not only prevents science from taking its natural course, but it also gatekeeps important information from the public.
A similar story took place with Ivermectin, another drug used for the treatment of Covdi-19, this time potentially implicating academia. Andrew Hill stated (at 5:15) that the conclusion of his paper on Ivermectin was influenced by Unitaid which is, coincidentally, the main funder of a new research centre at Hill’s workplace —the University of Liverpool. His meta-analysis showed that Ivermectin reduced mortality with Covid-19 by 75 percent. Instead of supporting Ivermectin use as a Covid-19 treatment, he concluded that further studies were needed.
The suppression of potentially life-saving treatments was instrumental for the emergency use authorization of the Covid-19 vaccines as the absence of a treatment for the disease is a condition for EUA (p.3).
Many media outlets are also guilty of sharing false information. This was in the form of biased reporting, or by accepting to be a platform for public relations (PR) campaigns. PR is an innocuous word for propaganda or the art of sharing information to influence public opinion in the service of special interest groups.
The danger of PR is that it passes for independent journalistic opinion to the untrained eye. PR campaigns aim to sensationalise scientific findings, possibly to increase consumer uptake of a given therapeutic, increase funding for similar research, or to increase stock prices. The pharmaceutical companies spent $6.88 billion on TV advertisements in 2021 in the US alone. Is it possible that this funding influenced media reporting during the Covid-19 pandemic?
Lack of integrity and conflicts of interest have led to an unprecedented institutional false information pandemic. It is up to the public to determine whether the above are instances of mis- or dis-information.
Public trust in the Media has seen its biggest drop over the last five years. Many are also waking up to the widespread institutional false information. The public can no longer trust ‘authoritative’ institutions that were expected to look after their interests. This lesson was learned at great cost. Many lives were lost due to the suppression of early treatment and an unsound vaccination policy; businesses ruined; jobs destroyed; educational achievement regressed; poverty aggravated; and both physical and mental health outcomes worsened. A preventable mass disaster.
We have a choice: either we continue to passively accept institutional false information or we resist. What are the checks and balances that we must put in place to reduce conflicts of interest in public health and research institutions? How can we decentralise the media and academic journals in order to reduce the influence of pharmaceutical advertising on their editorial policy?
As individuals, how can we improve our media literacy to become more critical consumers of information? There is nothing that dispels false narratives better than personal inquiry and critical thinking. So the next time conflicted institutions cry woeful wolf or vicious variant or catastrophic climate, we need to think twice.
Children’s Health Defence Europe: Interview of Drs Charles Hoffe, Dr. Crystal Luchkiw, Dr. Patrick Phillips, Dr. Mark Trozzi and attorney Michael Alexander.
Global Research, January 12, 2023
Dr. Mark Trozzi 11 January 2023
***
Thanks to Aga Wilson and Children’s Health Defence Europe for bringing international attention to the unlawful weaponization of the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and British Columbia, against ethical doctors who maintain our oaths and responsibilities, while refusing to participate in the covid-crimes-against-humanity. Here is the interview.
I take great pride in being one of these physicians. Dr. Hoffe, Dr. Luchkiw, Dr. Phillips, and Michael Alexander JD and are on my short list of heroes.
Video: Dr. McCullough Facing Certifications Revocation for Alleged “False…Information” Dissemination
https://tube.childrenshealthdefense.eu/videos/embed/bdd15ed7-25b4-432e-828e-38a3e02365fb
*
Tales from the Conspiratum 
