Ultra-Violet Secrets of Social Media
Program your mind yourself:
Are you a communist? Do you read? Do you think? You are a communist! Report to Homeland Security now!
See how it’s done, Prima Donna Trudeau?
Best Pfizer ad ever…
Restatement Of The Obvious℠ (eff/right/off)
“This is disturbing. I’ve seen 4 ppl collapse around me in the last month or so. 3 of them were younger than I am. I don’t recall another time in my life witnessing such an occurrence of randomly collapsing people, for no reason, so frequently. We should be worried.”
Remember the names: Blackrock, Vanguard.
https://www.rt.com/news/566177-taiwan-president-could-invaded/
Nov 8, 2022
“The Western countries, particularly the US, are helping Ukraine. What we see from the Ukraine war is Western countries get together and help Ukraine to fight,” she said.
Tsai Ing-wen delivers a speech during National Day celebrations in front of the Presidential Building in Taipei, Taiwan, October 10, 2022 © AP / Chiang Ying-ying
Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen told The Atlantic on Monday that there “is a genuine threat” of a Chinese invasion. China has insisted that it will strive to reintegrate Taiwan by peaceful means but should conflict break out, Tsai will be looking to the West for help.
In an article penned by Ben Rhodes, Barack Obama’s speechwriter and Deputy National Security Advisor, Tsai said that “we need to get ourselves ready” for a potential Chinese invasion. “It’s real that this thing could happen to us,” she continued, adding: “there is a genuine threat out there. It’s not hype.”
Taiwan has governed itself since nationalist forces led by Chiang Kai-shek fled to the island in 1949, after they lost a civil war to the Communists. Beijing’s position is that Taiwan is an integral part of China – the so-called ‘One China’ policy – and that China “will inevitably be reunified,” and a white paper released in August states that while Beijing will strive to achieve this reunification peacefully, it reserves the right to use military force.
China’s Xi sends message to military
While China’s military is orders of magnitude stronger than Taiwan’s, Tsai has boosted defense spending by 13% and will spend $19 billion on her military in 2023. Taipei’s aim, Rhodes outlined, is to make invasion too costly for China.
“If the [People’s Liberation Army] wants to do something drastic, [Chinese President] Xi has to weigh the costs,” Tsai told the former White House official. “He has to think twice.”
However, even with its double-digit increase in defense spending, and with the US authorizing a billion-dollar arms sale to Taipei in September, Tsai would still need the West to bankroll Taiwan’s military as it currently does for Ukraine’s forces.
“The Western countries, particularly the US, are helping Ukraine. What we see from the Ukraine war is Western countries get together and help Ukraine to fight,” she said.
The US government has officially recognized, but not endorsed, China’s sovereignty over Taiwan since the 1970s, and while US President Joe Biden has promised on several occasions that the American military would help repel a Chinese invasion, White House aides have walked these statements back every time.
Shortly after Tsai spoke to Rhodes, China opened its biennial air show, demonstrating anti-drone weapons, fifth-generation fighter jets, and reportedly hypersonic anti-ship missiles. Analysts described this flexing of military muscle as a warning to the West not to interfere with the reunification with Taiwan.
This is the very first time in decades that China has been on a war footing.
Michael Snyder
Nov 8, 2022
Chinese President Xi Jinping has just announced that China will be “preparing for war”, and that should deeply alarm all of us. Needless to say, nobody is going to be attacking China any time soon. So why would the Chinese need to prepare for war if there is zero chance that they will be attacked? Unfortunately, the answer is obvious. The only reason China would be engaged in a military conflict any time soon is if it chooses to invade Taiwan. The moment such an invasion is launched, the United States and China will be at war. The Chinese know this, but Chinese President Xi Jinping is going ahead with preparations for war anyway…
China will focus on preparing for war with the country’s security ‘increasingly unstable and uncertain’, President Xi Jinping has declared.
Beijing will now comprehensively strengthen its military training and preparation for any war, Xi said today, according to state broadcaster CCTV.
This is the very first time in decades that China has been on a war footing.
Not too long ago, the Chinese were our new best friends and we were doing all that we could to deepen trading relationships with them.
Now our economy is deeply, deeply dependent on goods from China, and once a military conflict erupts that flow of goods will come to a grinding halt.
So let us hope that such a war does not materialize any time soon.
Sadly, it has become exceedingly clear that Chinese President Xi Jinping is strongly considering the option of “reuniting” with Taiwan by force…
Xi’s announcement that China will focus on preparing for a war will raise fears that the nation may invade the self-governing island of Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its own.
China, which has the second-largest economy and military in the world, has repeatedly threatened to annex Taiwan by force if necessary.
A lot of people out there seem to assume that a conflict with China is not an imminent threat.
But just last month, the top ranking officer in the U.S. Navy warned that it could come “as soon as this year”…
Last month, US Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Michael Gilday warned that China could take Washington and the world by surprise and invade Taiwan as soon as this year.
Amid the military exercises by air and sea of Taiwan’s coast, Admiral Gilday said: ‘It’s not just what Jinping says, it’s how the Chinese behave and what they do.
‘What we’ve seen over the past 20 years is that they have delivered on every promise they’ve made earlier than they said they were going to deliver on it.’
Personally, I don’t think that we will see a war between the United States and China in 2022.
But 2023 is a very real possibility.
And it turns out that many officials in Japan also see the need to prepare for a coming conflict with China…
If China were to attack Taiwan, it wouldn’t just have to face a hostile superpower. It would also likely have to confront its longstanding regional rival, Japan. For centuries, Japan and China have vied for hegemony in East Asia; at times, they have threatened each other’s survival. Today, as I found from three days of meetings with Japanese officials and analysts in Tokyo, the threat of Chinese aggression is producing a quiet revolution in Japanese statecraft — and pushing the nation to get ready for a fight.
Tensions just continue to intensify month after month.
As I discuss in my brand new book, eventually a breaking point will be reached.
Meanwhile, North Korea and South Korea are also getting closer to war.
In recent days, North Korea has test-fired over 30 missiles, and that includes an ICBM which prompted “an evacuation alert in northern Japan”…
The North has test-fired more than 30 missiles this week, including an intercontinental ballistic missile Thursday which triggered an evacuation alert in northern Japan — a response to an aerial military exercise between South Korea and the US.
Of course, North Korea has test-fired lots of missiles before, but in this case, the North Koreans are actually admitting that they just conducted “simulated strikes on South Korea”…
North Korea said on Monday that its recent missile launches were simulated strikes on South Korea and the United States as the two countries held a “dangerous war drill,” while the South said it had recovered parts of a North Korean missile near its coast.
A war between North Korea and South Korea is coming.
But my personal opinion is that it won’t happen until China invades Taiwan first.
Speaking of missile tests, it is being reported that the Russians will soon conduct another test of the new RS-28 Sarmat…
Russia is reportedly plotting to test-fire an intercontinental ballistic missile for a second time. Moscow first tested the RS-28 Sarmat in April. It is capable of carrying 10 or more warheads and decoys, striking targets at 16,000mph.
Russian politician Aleksey Zhuravlyov previously threatened to use the deadly weapon as Finland and Sweden were poised to join NATO.
He said Satan-II could hit the UK in 200 seconds if fired from Russia’s European province, Kaliningrad.
It has been claimed that a single RS-28 Sarmat possesses enough firepower to destroy an area the size of Texas.
The U.S. does not have anything comparable.
In fact, the aging Minuteman missiles that currently form the backbone of the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal are not scheduled to be replaced by something new until sometime around 2030.
Unfortunately, the world will look completely different by 2030.
I believe that World War III has already begun, and several new conflicts are likely to erupt over the next 12 months.
In this article, I haven’t even talked about Israel and Iran. Personally, I think that is probably the most likely conflict to erupt next.
This truly is a time of “wars and rumors of wars”, but most people out there still do not understand what is happening.
Dr. Gabor Maté joins The Chris Hedges Report to discuss his new book, The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness and Healing in a Toxic Culture.
Dr. Gabor Maté is a physician and childhood development specialist who has written several best-selling books, including In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction; When the Body Says No: Exploring the Stress-Disease Connection; and Scattered Minds: The Origins and Healing of Attention Deficit Disorder.
I’m so just as shocked as you are. A billionaire is responsible for a million times more greenhouse gas emissions than the average person… And now these same billionaires, CEOs, and politicians are currently discussing at GOP27 in Egypt, how they could tax us more to fund their CO2 diminution plans… How ironic, isn’t it? FY!
The below article shows that the richest are more toxic and destructive to the environment than regular people through their investments and oh-so-secret ways of life. Runaway capitalism is in full swing and the lifestyles, ways of life, and total debauchery will lead to the destruction of the Earth.
Oxfam has reported that the wealthiest people are responsible for about a million times more emissions than the world’s lowest earners when taking into account their investments. In other words the 125 wealthiest people-Musk, Walton, Buffet, and Gates included, have a combined carbon footprint that is equivalent to the entire country of France. The investments themselves continue dirty industries and lead to the creation of more emissions added to the existing whole.
Oxfam first pulled together a list of the world’s 220 people, and identified the corporations that they hold investments in, and currently have a 10% equity stake in. Naturally, it should be known that most of the research itself may not be accurate. The reason being there is an overall lack of transparency that has come from the world of billionaires.
The transparency comes down to the wealthiest actual investments and additionally a lack of transparency around corporate emissions, meaning that the numbers are likely way higher than reported by Oxfam. Based on the research this means 3.3 million tons for the richest people, followed by about 25.4 for an average person in the UK, and then followed by the world’s 10% poorest at around 3 tons per person.
The influence of the few and the wealthy continues to show the runaway effects of capitalism and continues to sow the world’s destruction. The numbers themselves reported here aren’t accurate and are way higher. It also isn’t a final list, with no mention of Bezos, etc.
According to the Oxfam website:
Billionaire investments in polluting industries such as fossil fuels and cement double the average for the S&P 500
The investments of just 125 billionaires emit 393 million tonnes of CO2e each year – the equivalent of France – at an individual annual average that is a million times higher than someone in the bottom 90 percent of humanity.
Carbon Billionaires: The investment emissions of the world’s richest people, is a report published by Oxfam today based on a detailed analysis of the investments of 125 of the richest billionaires in some of the world’s biggest corporates and the carbon emissions of these investments. These billionaires have a collective $2.4 trillion stake in 183 companies.
The report finds that these billionaires’ investments produce an annual average of 3m tonnes of CO2e per person, which is a million times higher than the average for people living in the bottom 90 percent (2.76 tonnes of CO2e).
The actual figure is likely to be higher still, as published carbon emissions by corporates have been shown to systematically underestimate the true level of carbon impact. Further, billionaires and corporates who do not publicly reveal their emissions (and are therefore not included in the research), are likely to be those with a high climate impact.
“These few billionaires together have ‘investment emissions’ that equal the carbon footprints of entire countries like France, Egypt or Argentina,” said Nafkote Dabi, Climate Change Lead at Oxfam. “The major and growing responsibility of wealthy people for overall emissions is rarely discussed or considered in climate policy-making. This has to change. These billionaire investors at the top of the corporate pyramid have a huge responsibility for driving climate breakdown. They have escaped accountability for too long.”
“Emissions from billionaire lifestyles – due to their frequent use of private jets and yachts – are thousands of times the average person, which is already completely unacceptable,” said Dabi. “But if we look at emissions from their investments, then their carbon emissions are over a million times higher.” said.
Contrary to average people, studies show the world’s wealthiest individuals’ investments account for up to 70 percent of their emissions. Oxfam has used public data to calculate the “investment emissions” of billionaires with over 10 percent stakes in a corporation. The study allocates billionaires a share of the reported emissions of the corporates in which they are invested, in proportion to their stake.
The study also found billionaires had an average of 14 percent of their investments in polluting industries such as energy and materials like cement. This is twice the average for investments in the S&P 500. Only one billionaire in the sample had investments in a renewable energy company.
“We need COP27 to expose and change the role that big corporates and their rich investors are playing in driving the climate crisis by profiting from pollution,” said Dabi. “They can’t be allowed to hide or greenwash. We need governments to tackle this urgently by publishing emission figures for the richest people, regulating investors and corporates to slash carbon emissions and taxing wealth and polluting investments.”
The choice of investments billionaires make is shaping the future of our economy, for example, by backing high carbon infrastructure – locking in high emissions for decades to come. The study found that if the billionaires in the sample moved their investments to a fund with stronger environmental and social standards, it could reduce the intensity of their emissions by up to four times.
“The super-rich need to be taxed and regulated away from polluting investments that are destroying the planet. Governments must put also in place ambitious regulations and policies that compel corporations to be more accountable and transparent in reporting and radically reducing their emissions,” said Dabi.
Oxfam has estimated that a wealth tax on the world’s super-rich could raise $1.4 trillion a year, vital resources that could help developing countries – those worst hit by the climate crisis – to adapt, address loss and damage and carry out a just transition to renewable energy. According to the UNEP adaptation costs for developing countries could rise to $300 billion per year by 2030. Africa alone will require $600 billion between 2020 to 2030. Oxfam is also calling for steeply higher tax rates for investments in polluting industries to deter such investments.
The report says that many corporations are off track in setting their climate transition plans, including hiding behind unrealistic and unreliable decarbonization plans with the promise of attaining net zero targets only by 2050. Fewer than one in three of the 183 corporates reviewed by Oxfam are working with the Science Based Targets Initiative. Only 16 percent have set net-zero targets.
Ahead of the deliberations at COP27, Oxfam is calling for the following actions:
by: Arsenio Toledo
Tuesday, November 08, 2022
Tech entrepreneur, philanthropist and Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine expert and researcher Steve Kirsch has compiled all publicly available data on the vaccine to prove that it is the most dangerous vaccine in recorded history.
In Kirsch’s personal Substack blog, he laid out some of “the most compelling pieces of evidence” he could gather proving the dangers of getting vaccinated against COVID-19. While by no means an exhaustive list, it provides the key pieces of data that are impossible for scientists to properly explain if the COVID-19 vaccines actually are safe and effective. (Related: Panel of experts: More and more young people are dying because of COVID-19 vaccines.)
The most compelling piece of evidence by far is data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a United States government program for reporting vaccine safety issues co-managed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
According to VAERS, an estimated hundreds of thousands of Americans have been killed by the COVID-19 vaccines, with several million more injured.
Graphs showing the number of vaccine-related deaths submitted to VAERS show a massive jump in 2021 as soon as the COVID-19 vaccines start being distributed in the United States. The CDC is claiming that VAERS is overreported but cites no evidence. Kirsch’s own investigation suggests that VAERS could be underreported by a factor of 5.4 times.
“This is a clear message that the CDC is not monitoring safety events. We were lied to. They said they were watching the safety signals like a hawk. They forgot to mention the hawk had a blindfold on,” wrote Kirsch. “If these [deaths and injuries] weren’t caused by the vaccine, what caused them? Why are there more adverse events reported for these vaccines than for all other vaccines in history combined? Nobody can answer that question.”
The convenient disappearance of certain types of data from all over the world further proves how dangerous the COVID-19 vaccine is.
In the United States, the FDA is withholding autopsy reports from people who died within hours or days after getting vaccinated.
If the COVID-19 vaccines were not the cause of these deaths, Kirsch noted that there would be no reason for the FDA to block autopsy reports from going public.
In Canada, the number one cause of death is listed as “unexplained.” This so-called “unknown cause” is one of the top causes of death in most Canadian provinces and territories, and it is the number one killer in the province of Alberta.
In Israel, a confidential meeting between officials from the Ministry of Health and top Israeli scientists claims that the main reason scientists and Big Pharma never notified Israeli officials about the safety issues from the vaccines is because of budget and staffing issues.
“Apparently, they had millions of dollars to promote the vaccines as safe and effective, but they forgot to budget for the possibility they were wrong,” wrote Kirsch.
In the conclusion of his article laying out all of the evidence, Kirsch asked: “Are the vaccines ‘safe and effective’ as claimed?’
“To answer this, science requires that we look at all the available data and see whether the data is more consistent with the hypothesis of ‘safe and effective’ or ‘not safe and effective,’” he wrote. “All the data that I and my colleagues have seen end up being placed in the ‘not’ bucket. We are open to being shown we got it wrong on the hundreds of pieces of evidence we have examined, but nobody is willing to discuss the data with us to resolve the issue, not even for one million dollars.”
Watch this short clip of Steve Kirsch explaining how Medicare data shows that the COVID-19 vaccine is killing massive numbers of people.
https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4fc962ad-496e-4af0-8ae2-118d2c436ba0
This video is from the Free4Eva Media channel on Brighteon.com.
Dr. Bryan Ardis: Engineered COVID virus contains DOZENS of synthetic animal venoms.
HOLOCAUST OF THE UNBORN: Babies are DYING because their mothers got “vaccinated” for COVID.
NOT the virus: Deaths among teens and 20-somethings soar following COVID “vaccine” release.
Sources include:
Tales from the Conspiratum 
