A reminder to those of you who did not notice. Disclosure has happened. It happened with a whisper and civilization did not collapse. The effort has been cleverly engineered so society does not turn into a Mad Max movie.. Yes, UFOs are real. Aliens exist. They are here.
This is a great list of some of the best thinkers on the issue. If you are new to the subject I suggest you start with Richard Dolan and Linda Moulton-Howe. Both are credible veterans on the subject.
During WW2, the Japanese built a human testing facility in China, which has come to be known as Unit 731. This was worse than a lot of concentration camps, but the people involved were never punished because the US granted them immunity and attempted to cover it up in exchange for access to their research. The Soviet Union attempted to try the people involved, and the US called it communist propaganda.
The test subjects involved prisoners, but also the homeless, the mentally disabled, and random Chinese civilians kidnapped from nearby towns, including pregnant women and infants.
Vivisections (cutting a person open with a T-shaped cut) were regularly performed, usually without anesthesia. Patients’ limbs were randomly removed and improperly reattached to see what would happen, and internal organs were also randomly taken. All without anesthesia, of course.
Prisoners were also injected with STDs (mainly syphilis) and then forced at gunpoint to rape other prisoners to spread the disease. Some of these prisoners included pregnant women, in which case they would either be vivisected live and have their fetuses removed, or the syphilis riddled babies would be born and eventually killed.
They also participated in biological warfare in several cities, usually by infecting fleas with paratyphoid and releasing them.
They tested any and all sorts of weapons on the prisoners, notably grenades and chemical bombs.
They also stuck people in pressure chambers until their eyeballs popped, spun people in centrifuges until they died, burned them alive, stuck people in gas chambers, injected them with random substances, and froze their limbs before breaking them off.
Most of the experiments had no practical application, and were done purely out of sadism. The Japanese government didn’t officially admit to this until 2003, and the US still actively denies it.
So yeah, have fun thinking about this. For more horrific war crimes committed by the Japanese, consider reading about The Rape of Nanking.
In this video, we discuss Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechtenstein, and the fascinating story about his involvement in the #UFO topic. I highlight the story of the prince on the channel to remind you the experiencer, the truth seeker, that you are not alone and this phenomenon affects people from all walks of life. Hope you enjoy the video and as always my friends never stop searching for the truth.
The point of the joke lies in the fact that it was Washington that refused to implement the treaty. At the same time, it was Washington that accused Moscow of violating the treaty. In 2018, Washington officials announced that Moscow was developing new types of weapons contrary to the provisions of the INF Treaty.
Yes aunt Mildred, this is from Russia
How many angels are there on the tip of the needle? This question is just as pointless as an attempt to find an answer to the question of how many NATO missiles there are in Europe. The North Atlantic Alliance is known for its arrogance. This could be the reason behind the announcement from US President’s Special Representative for Nuclear Nonproliferation Jeffrey Eberhardt, who shamelessly called on Russia on October 14 to abide by the terms of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty).
The point of the joke lies in the fact that it was Washington that refused to implement the treaty. At the same time, it was Washington that accused Moscow of violating the treaty. In 2018, Washington officials announced that Moscow was developing new types of weapons contrary to the provisions of the INF Treaty.
The Treaty on Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles was signed in 1987. It came into force in 1988 and made it mandatory to destroy all ground-based ballistic missiles, the flight performance of which was ranging from 500 to 1000 km and from 1000 to 5500 km. According to the treaty, the USSR destroyed 117 ground-based launchers in the countries of the Warsaw Pact, as well as in the European part of its territory. The United States dismantled only 32 launchers. The USA put forward an initiative to suspend the treaty in 2019.
How it all started
Back in 2014, Russia’s “partners” overseas began to present numerous claims to Moscow. In particular, the US accused Russia of developing the Novator 9M729 missile, which, according to many military specialists, did not fall under the INF Treaty. Such behaviour was perceived as an attempt to get rid of the context that was holding down a new round of the arms race. The original goal had been achieved long in advance: NATO managed to deceive the vigilance of the Soviet Union and expand the zone of its unconditional domination. NATO no longer wanted to pretend to be the dove of peace.
In fact, the USSR, and later Russia, had always respected the strategic agreements, even if they contradicted to national interests. It is worth recalling that 33 years ago Russia destroyed not only such missiles as the Pioneer, Relief and Temp-S, but even the Oka that had not fallen under the range of the treaty. Its combat range did not exceed 400 km.
However, in 2017, at a regular meeting of representatives of signatory parties, the military unanimously agreed that the existing treaty had to be strengthened and even expanded. At the same time, then US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo disavowed the treaty literally a year later — in 2018.
Do the Americans really want to put the Tomahawk ground modifications — the Gryphon missile — on alert again? Do they want to bring the Pershing back from oblivion? Russia is ready for such a possible development. Two years ago, Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoygu confirmed that Russia was capable to respond to any American initiative. In particular, Shoygu announced the creation of a ground-based version of the Caliber sea-based hypersonic complex.
The Caliber complex is armed with advanced cruise missiles. It comes in four configurations and can be installed both on surface warships and on submarines, even on airplanes. The fourth type of the system is the mobile land complex Caliber-M. This is a universal weapon capable of striking targets both at a distance of up to 300 km and up to 1500 km. The complex was developed about 20 years ago. Its first successful tests on underwater carriers took place back in 2004. According to official reports, the Zircon hypersonic missile can be launched from the system as well.
In addition to the formidable Caliber, Russia may also revive the solid-fuel Pioneer missile, suitable for destroying targets at distances of up to 5,000 km. There are military analysts who do not exclude the appearance of a new type of launchers based on the Kinzhal hypersonic missile system.
It all started from US target missiles, which NATO missile defence systems used for defence practices. It was back in 2013 when the Russian military, on numerous occasions, pointed out to Western counterparts that Hera and Anchor target missiles had the performance features of typical intermediate and shorter-range missiles. It was clear to all that under the guise of military manoeuvres, NATO was practicing missile attacks on the Russian borders. The Israeli army was also part of the game, by the way.
Interestingly, it was reported in October of this year, that Estonia acquired Israeli Blue Spear anti-ship missiles, which can be quickly and easily converted into a ground-based weapon that may pose a formidable threat to a number of Russian regions, the Kaliningrad enclave in the first place.
Thus, it just so happens that NATO, quite in the spirit of Mark Milley, the 20th chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, is working on a massive offensive against Russia that would be conducted with the use of various types of weapons.
It was no coincidence that Acting Deputy Director of the Department for Nonproliferation and Arms Control of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Konstantin Vorontsov, called on the United States and its allies in early October to introduce a moratorium on the deployment of the medium and shorter-range missiles in Europe.
Why do the Americans need new/old types of missiles? After all, they will not change both the overall balance of strategic types of weapons and the mutually assured destruction (MAD coefficient).
Most likely, such a burning desire to get rid of the shackles of the INF Treaty is associated with the quiet paranoia, which has been tormenting defence-inquiring minds in the US for several years now.
As Vladimir Putin has recently noted, Russia has for the first time become the absolute leader in the field of innovative technologies, while the United States has been left behind to catch up again.
At one time it took the USSR only four years to build its own atomic bomb to thus restore parity with the United States in 1949. These days, however, the United States has not been able to perform a test launch of a guided hypersonic missile for several years now. The world is waking up to see that the king is naked.Kinzhal hypersonic missile
Buried in the massive $3.5 trillion “reconciliation” bill are unconstitutional fines for employers who don’t mandate COVID-19 jabs or regular COVID-19 testing of their employees
Fines on employers could run as high as $70,000 for serious infractions and $700,000 for each “willful” or repeated violation
The unconstitutional fines as a mechanism for vaccine enforcement would bankrupt all but the largest businesses
Calling the vaccine mandate for businesses “tyrannical,” the No Taxation Without Congressional Consent Act, introduced September 30, 2021, would prohibit the federal government from imposing a fine, fee or tax on individuals or businesses for violating a COVID-19 vaccine mandate
Buried in the massive $3.5 trillion “reconciliation” bill is an unconstitutional vaccine enforcement mechanism that threatens to bankrupt businesses unless they force their employees to get a COVID-19 injection. If the measure is enacted into law, even employers that respect their employees’ rights to health freedom and informed consent would be left with an impossible decision — mandate COVID-19 jabs or essentially go out of business due to unbearable fines.
The White House announced in September 2021 that companies with 100 or more employees would have to ensure staff have gotten a COVID-19 injection or were tested regularly for COVID-19. The Labor Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is to be in charge of enforcing the rule, which will affect more than 80 million U.S. workers.1
In order to carry out this draconian measure, OSHA plans to use an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) — a drastic measure used to accelerate new orders that has only been attempted 10 times in the agency’s 50-year history. OSHA would also be able to enforce fines of up to $13,600 per violation of the rules — but the new measure tucked into the reconciliation bill raises the fines for noncompliance astronomically.
Before we get any further, it should be noted that the mandate doesn’t actually exist yet, in that it hasn’t been sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for approval, and it’s not yet a legally enforceable mandate. Still, by announcing it as though it’s an inevitable rule, it may have the same effect of triggering workers to get vaccinated — or allowing companies to enact mandates under the veil of the government “mandate.”2
$700,000 Fines for Businesses That Don’t Force Injections
On page 168 of the 2,465-page bill3 is wording that should send an authoritarian chill down the back of anyone who believes in health freedom. It outlines fines for employers that “willfully,” “repeatedly” or seriously violate the labor law, including by not requiring COVID-19 jabs or regular COVID-19 testing. As Forbes reported:4
“The increased fines on employers could run as high as $70,000 for serious infractions, and $700,000 for willful or repeated violations — almost three-quarters of a million dollars for each fine. If enacted into law, vax enforcement could bankrupt non-compliant companies even more quickly than the $14,000 OSHA fine anticipated under Biden’s announced mandate.”
In case you missed it, that $700,000 fine is for each violation, meaning it would bankrupt all but the very largest corporations if they don’t fully comply with COVID-19 jab mandates or take on the cost of weekly COVID-19 testing of their employees.
Currently, the fines only apply to businesses with 100 or more employees, but there’s nothing stopping them from changing it to 50 employees — or one employee. Anything could happen at this point. Some, such as Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, have called on businesses to “openly rebel” against the OSHA rule. But as Forbes put it:5
“It’s one thing to defy a $14,000 fine. It’s quite another to risk incurring hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines. One or two disgruntled employees, for example, could bring an employer $70,000-$140,000 in OSHA fines. If considered ‘willful,’ as per Rep. Roy’s tweet — just three ‘violations’ could quickly become a $2.1 million OSHA fine.”
The Mandate Doesn’t Actually Exist
As mentioned, the mandate that President Biden announced is currently a “mirage.”6 Speaking with The Federalist, a spokeswoman for the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration explained, “There is nothing there yet that gives employers any mandate. The president made an announcement on this asking OSHA to do it, but we’ve not yet seen anything come from it yet.”7
An ETS may take six months to go into effect even after the mandate is put in the Federal Register — which hasn’t happened yet. OSHA’s COVID-19 Healthcare ETS also makes no mention of vaccine mandates at this time.8 ETS rules are also often overturned in court. In the last five decades, courts have challenged six of the 10 ETS standards that have been suggested, with five of the six getting overturned.9
However, using the ETS for the “mandate,” the Federalist pointed out, “allows the Biden administration to push its demands faster and without any public input or requirement of responding to public input, which is normally required of even legally laughable federal rule making like this one would be.”10
This may be why more lawsuits haven’t been filed to challenge the mandate — there’s nothing to challenge just yet. It’s also worth mentioning that less than 2% of U.S. businesses will be affected by the mandate, as more than 98% of U.S. businesses have fewer than 100 employees, exempting them from the mandate. Still, those 2% account for about two-thirds of U.S. employees, so they’re a sizeable minority.11
Many of these large corporations have already put injection mandates into place or were planning to. The “mandate” announcement allows these mega-corporations to mandate the jabs without having to be the bad guy.
Congressmen Try to Block ‘Tyrannical Vaccine Mandate’
Roy and Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, introduced a bill — the No Taxation Without Congressional Consent Act — September 30, 2021, that would prohibit the federal government from imposing a fine, fee or tax on individuals or businesses for violating a COVID-19 vaccine mandate issued by OSHA or other agencies. If it passes, it would prevent the outrageous fines threatening to bankrupt small businesses under the reconciliation bill. Roy said:12
“Your decision about whether or not to get a COVID vaccine should be yours and yours alone … [the] proposed mandate is unconstitutional, and flat-out tyrannical. No freedom-loving American should comply. This country needs, and her people deserve, healthcare freedom.
That means taking control over our care back from politicians and bureaucrats. I am proud to introduce this legislation with my good friend Senator Mike Lee to gut the federal government’s ability to enforce this unconstitutional mandate.”
Further, being unvaxxed is not a crime. Allowing for these exorbitant fines only further attempts to segregate society into one of vaxxed versus unvaxxed. But, as Lee added:13
“Unvaccinated Americans aren’t the enemy. We should not be forcing employers to fire some of their valuable, and now hard to find, workers. We shouldn’t be threatening business owners with closure who do not wish to police their workforce’s decisions. Many simply cannot incur the cost of this enforcement in this economy.”
Jab Mandates Are Spreading
Vaccine mandates are targeting every angle, from places of employment to restaurants, gyms and sports arenas. Los Angeles recently approved one of the strictest mandates in the U.S. and will require a vaccine passport to enter indoor public spaces like shopping malls, museums, restaurants, spas and other locations.14
California also became the first U.S. state to require students in kindergarten through grade 12 to receive COVID-19 shots following full FDA approval.15 Council president Nury Martinez called the move “a necessary step towards returning to normalcy,” but there’s nothing “normal” about presenting proof of an injection to go about your daily life.16
This, however, is what the “new normal” is all about — increasing surveillance and authoritarian control while removing personal liberties, and vaccine passports have always been part of the plan.
The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) 2030 agenda is part and parcel of what is now advertised as The Great Reset,17 a plan that originated in something called the Global Redesign Initiative, drafted by the WEF in the wake of the 2008 economic crisis. The Transnational Institute’s website describes the initiative as “multi-stakeholderism,” a “corporate push for a new form of global governance.”18
Vaccine Passports as Part of the ‘New Normal’
WEF and the Commons Project created the Common Trust Network, which developed the CommonPass app that’s acting as a health passport. The app allows users to upload medical data such as a COVID-19 test result or proof of injection, which then generates a QR code that you show to authorities as your health passport.19
Eventually, the CommonPass framework will be integrated with already existing personal health apps such as Apple Health and CommonHealth. If you want to travel, your personal health record will be evaluated and compared to a country’s entry requirements, and if you don’t meet them, you’ll be directed to an approved testing and vaccination location. WEF is pushing for the World Health Organization’s collaboration, stating:20
“Rather than building a set of rules that would be left to the interpretation of member states or private-sector operators like cruises, airlines or conveners of gatherings, we support the WHO’s effort to create a standard for member states for requesting vaccinations and how it would permit the various kinds of use cases.
It is important that we rely on the normative body (the WHO) to create the vaccine credential requirements. The Forum is involved in the WHO taskforce to reflect on those standards and think about how they would be used.”
This, too, is disturbing, since WHO’s history clearly illustrates its allegiance to Big Pharma and other industries. A review in the Journal of Integrative Medicine & Therapy went so far as to say the corruption of WHO is the “biggest threat to the world’s public health of our time,” particularly as it relates to WHO’s drug recommendations — including its “list of essential medicines” — which it believes is biased and not reliable.21
Given the strong and ongoing evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by industry, its usefulness as a guardian of public health — and an arbiter of vaccine passports — needs to be seriously reevaluated.
Obey or You’ll Get Fined
Threats of punishment like fines have become increasingly common and accepted during the pandemic. Both Roy and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green, R-Ga., were fined for not wearing face masks on the House floor, for instance. The initial fine for such an offense is $500, but since this was Greene’s second “offense,” she was fined $2,500.22
In the U.K., meanwhile, there’s the NHS COVID app, which notifies you if you’ve been in close contact (defined as within 6 feet for 15 minutes or more) with someone who tested positive for COVID-19. If you don’t self-isolate after being notified, you can be fined £1,000 ($1,390) or more.23
Other penalties are also being rolled out for those who choose not to get the injection. On August 25, 2021, Delta Air Lines announced that unvaccinated employees who are on the company health plan will have a $200 monthly surcharge added, beginning November 1, 2021.24
It’s yet another example of the injection-only mindset that has proliferated since the start of the pandemic. Meanwhile, in the U.S. and much of the world, COVID-19 is still being regarded as a disease that should only be treated once a person is hospitalized. At that point, the person is already seriously ill and has missed the opportunity for inexpensive, early treatment options that have shown significant success in reducing rates of hospitalization and death.25
The penalties and punishments also reek of coercion. One of the principles of the Nuremberg Code is that humans must give voluntary consent when participating in medical experiments, and that consent must be given, among other things, “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.”26
Given the emergency use authorization, not approval, the mass jab administration constituted a research trial. While the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 jab received FDA approval August 23, 2021, the injection’s approval represents the fastest approval in history,27 granted less than four months after Pfizer filed for licensing May 7, 2021.28 So, for all intents and purposes, it’s still in the research phase.
It’s quite possible that the decision to penalize people for choosing to avoid a COVID-19 injection could be seen as a form of coercion.
What About Natural Immunity?
The other glaring issue is there’s no mention of natural immunity. It’s the elephant in the room that the mainstream COVID-19 narrative refuses to acknowledge. A sizable number of Americans already have natural immunity from a prior COVID-19 infection.
How can you threaten a person with fines or loss of employment to get an injection for a disease to which they’re already immune? This is likely to prompt more than a few lawsuits, especially since it’s been shown that natural immunity may protect you significantly better than an injection.
Data presented July 17, 2021, to the Israeli Health Ministry revealed that, of the more than 7,700 COVID-19 cases reported since May 2021, only 72 occurred in people who had previously had COVID-19 — a rate of less than 1%. In contrast, more than 3,000 cases — or approximately 40% — occurred in people who had received a COVID-19 vaccine.29
It’s important to keep your eyes open at this point in history and resist the insidious removal of freedoms from society that’s currently occurring. In their place are empty promises to give you your freedom back if you submit to an injection, a mask, a lockdown.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, for example, recently stated that vaccine passports are “all about” letting you know that “if you’ve done the right things, you get to be safe” wherever you go.30 And those who refuse to do “the right thing,” well, they simply aren’t entitled to those same “freedoms.”
The disease countermeasures we currently see for COVID-19 won’t end with COVID-19, and fines for business owners who choose not to force their employees to make a certain medical decision are only the beginning. We must not continue down this rabbit hole. Now is the time to speak out in peaceful protest in order to compel positive changes in support of health and overall freedom.
Is there a policy to euthanize older patients in the hospital?.Are older people being killed before their time? What is the role of the state in this dramatic policy-shift?.
Jacqui Deevoy is an investigative journalist who has interviewed over 50 whistleblowers who believe their parents or partners were euthanized while in hospital. While I have no way to verify their claims, Deevoy’s presentation of the evidence is compelling to say the least.
For that reason, I decided to transcribe part of the interview so readers could parse the words for themselves and make their own determination. I should add, that I have read enough anecdotal accounts of suspicious elderly care treatment in Europe and the US (since the pandemic began), that I suspect Deevoy may be onto something bigger and more sinister than we might have imagined. And if there is a grain of truth to what she says, then open-minded people will have to mull-over the prospect that “depopulation” might not be such a loony “conspiracy theory” after all.
But that’s for you to decide. I’m merely presenting this video because I found it so disturbing and because I’m convinced that You Tube will remove it before it is widely circulated.State Euthanasia??
Jacqui Deevoy, investigative journalist: (Text starts at 2-minute mark) “Last summer, someone contacted me….he said his father was murdered in hospital… which was pretty shocking… but because I’ve had alot of people coming to me about it… I took it seriously…. So, I started looking into it, and what I found was pretty shocking…. We now have alot of evidence that what he said was true, not just for his father but alot of other people’s relatives as well who were victims to this “protocol”… I decided that this needed to “go public” so I contacted 28 editors…… But didn’t get even one single reply…. and that surprised me because I’d never been ‘blanked’ so broadly…“… what I’d actually pitched to them (the 28 mainstream media editors) was a story, backed up with alot of evidence that the elderly were being killed in hospitals, care homes, and hospices; being put on “end of life” care before they needed to be. And I’ve spoken to 50 people who have experienced this firsthand, and I found 16 who were willing to speak to the papers and to go public. …We have so much evidence now. We have documents from the House of Commons, we have documents to prove that Midazolam was ordered last March, to treat Covid patients. How Midazolam can treat Covid patients, I don’t know, because Covid is a respiratory disease, and Midazolam works by suppressing the respiratory system leading to death.The more midazolam you give, the more likely the person will die. Midazolam is used in America as an execution drug, in a huge amount…. It’s a horrible way to go. I have evidence that Midazolam was given to unconscious patients… people who had one jab and fell unconscious, and while they were still unconscious, were still being administered it, which doesn’t make any sense. There are so many stories. …..Covidian Creed
Gareth Icke–…”The proof is there in black and white.. and the amount of this drug that was administered compared to other years, is insane! It’s on average a 100,000 more doses of it (midazolam) per month then before the pandemic. And, the excuse that it’s being used in operations, but they haven’t done any operations! (The whole thing was a fraud.) So where is this drug going??”Jacqui Deevoy: “I think we’re all arriving at the same conclusions… I think this is going on worldwide.” (End of interview)
A little background on Midazolam: “Midazolam, sold under the brand name Versed, among others, is…used for anesthesia, procedural sedation, trouble sleeping, and severe agitation. It works by inducing sleepiness, decreasing anxiety, and causing a loss of ability to create new memories…. (Wikipedia).End of life care
In the final stages of end-of-life care, midazolam is routinely used at low doses via subcutaneous injection to help with agitation, myoclonus, restlessness or anxiety in the last hours or days of life…
The drug has been introduced for use in executions by lethal injection in certain jurisdictions in the United States in combination with other drugs…. Midazolam acts as a sedative to render the condemned prisoner unconscious, at which time vecuronium bromide and potassium chloride are administered, stopping the prisoner’s breathing and heart, respectively….
Use in executions
The usage of midazolam in executions became controversial after condemned inmate Clayton Lockett apparently regained consciousness and started speaking midway through his 2014 execution when the state of Oklahoma attempted to execute him with an untested three-drug lethal injection combination using 100 mg of midazolam. Prison officials reportedly discussed taking him to a hospital before he was pronounced dead of a heart attack 40 minutes after the execution began.” (Midazolam, Wikipedia)
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Michael Whitney, renowned geopolitical and social analyst based in Washington State. He initiated his career as an independent citizen-journalist in 2002 with a commitment to honest journalism, social justice and World peace.
He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
Several months ago, we expressed at least “theoretical reservations” about vaccinating cancer patients or former patients who had been cured, because of the underlying mechanism of the gene injection on immunity.
Several geneticists had also expressed their concerns about the possible interference between active or dormant cancer cells and the activity of gene therapy on lymphocytes in particular.
Months have passed, and the vaccine madness has amplified, leading to the refusal of patients without a passport in hospitals (which, as is well known, are intended to receive only healthy people) and to the demand that patients be vaccinated before receiving any treatment, including cancer patients.
We are in a world gone mad and yet these stories are multiplying, such as this young man of 22 years who had a chronic cough leading to an X-ray discovering a mediastinal mass. The two big Paris hospitals that received him refused to start the treatment (without it being explained in detail) if the patient refused the experimental injection, of absolutely unknown effects on the development of cancers.
The doctors’ justification? None: “that’s the way it is”, and we have accepted it!
Silence on the colleagues suspended for lack of obedience and even more on the objective reasons that made them prefer to lose their jobs, their remuneration, their houses, their families intolerant to these decisions as well, rather than submit to the presidential ukase to accept experimental drugs…
Would more than three hundred thousand caregivers (a figure that is probably highly underestimated given the number of hospitals and clinics currently forced to close beds and postpone interventions due to lack of personnel) be crazy, conspiratorial or delusional to the point of putting themselves in great personal, social, family, professional and psychological danger?
Have the doctors who claim that vaccination is safe taken the time to look at the statistics of the effects reported and accepted by the official agencies? Are the FDA, EMA, MHRA also “conspiratorial” when they release statistics as in the case of VAERS, which is entity of the CDC:
VAERS as of September 26, 2021
More than 726,000 Covid vaccine-related adverse events reported to VAERS as CDC and FDA overturn advisory committee recommendations on Pfizer’s third vaccine.
VAERS data released by the CDC included a total of 726,965 adverse event reports from all age groups following Covid vaccines, including 15,386 deaths and 99,410 serious complications between December 14, 2020, and September 17, 2021.
Or Eudra Vigilance pharmacovigilance body of the European Medicines Agency
Or even the ANSM, our French agency, which shows more than 1200 deaths accepted as at least possibly related to these experimental injections.
All therapeutic trials for fifty years were stopped after a few deaths for investigation (53 deaths stopped the H1N1 vaccine). Here, thousands of deaths throughout the world and children are shamelessly attacked. How can we continue to believe that this is a health policy?
Why this denial of the most solid sects on the part of theoretically educated doctors, capable of obtaining information directly from reliable sources and equipped with a brain?
Fear of the boss, of the director, who in a few months’ time will inevitably be called into question, since many countries are backtracking and even Germany wants to get out of vaccine terrorism, perhaps on the occasion of Mrs Merkel’s departure.
“The leading organizations of contracted physicians in Germany are demanding an immediate end to the “anti-corona” measures and an end to the “horror rhetoric and panic politics”. Obviously, French hospital doctors in Paris and elsewhere do not read German newspapers and are terrorized by the threats of their professional association, their minister, and become kapos and terrorize their patients.
More and More Testimonies are Coming In
Whatever their unacceptable reasons, testimonies are multiplying.
A young girl accompanies her friend to her mother’s funeral… such a mother, mother of a high school friend, 34 years old, in remission from breast cancer for two years, who is injected with the vaccine and collapses a few days later in a coma and dies after three days of hospitalization… Politically correct explanation: the cancer exploded and took her away. Close the chapter and the coffin.Diagnostic Lab Certified Pathologist Reports 20 Times Increase of Cancer in Vaccinated Patients
What would Maigret have said? [Historic Police Investigator]
But too many coincidences shock the police investigators in front of a corpse. Only doctors would not have the right to think about coincidences of time, for example: “temporality” is their key word…
Like the misleading slogan, “the numbers are always right”. Yes, if they are true and observed in the real world.
But how much confidence can we have in the rigged simulations that the government and the media feed us without ever specifying that they are only predictions or estimates? 5] But one can do what one wants with the figures, when one chooses them, or creates them to justify the chosen hypothesis, and the the results are totally blurred.
In any case, as far as “cancer and gene injection” is concerned, the vagueness unfortunately dissipates in front of the multitude of terrible stories.
From the colleague who sees multiple “balls” appearing under her armpits, which the check-ups in the hospital do not explain… Obviously no possible link with the vax. And yet the ganglions that appear some time after the injection are a frequent observation after these vax.
So clearly there seems to be three situations:
The appearance of a cancer rapidly after the injection (two weeks to a few months) and very progressive, in a person who was previously free of known carcinological pathologies.
The resumption of cancer in a patient who has been in complete remission for several months or years.
The rapid, even explosive, evolution of a cancer that is not yet controlled.
Beyond the testimonies that are pouring in from relatives and friends and on social networks, a Swiss newspaper has finally addressed the subject in a broader way.
Here are some excerpts from their article and their references:
“Can covid vaccines cause cancer?
In some cases, the answer seems to be yes. Certainly, there is no evidence that the covid vaccines themselves are carcinogenic. However, it has been shown that in up to 50% of vaccinees, covid vaccines can induce temporary immunosuppression or immune dysregulation (lymphocytopenia) that can last for about a week or possibly longer.
Furthermore, covid mRNA vaccines have been shown to “reprogram” (i.e., influence) adaptive and innate immune responses and, in particular, to downregulate the so-called TLR4 pathway, which is known to play an important role in the immune response to infections and cancer cells.”
Thus the authors conclude that it is quite possible that these immune changes could have unintended consequences on the condition of the recipient of the gene injection. A matter of common sense indeed!
“Thus, if there is already a tumor somewhere – known or unknown – or if there is a predisposition to a certain type of cancer, such a state of vaccine-induced immune suppression or immune dysregulation could potentially trigger sudden tumor growth and cancer within weeks of vaccination. It should be noted that lymphocytopenia was also frequently observed in cases of severe covid.
Post-vaccination reactivation of latent viral infections, including shingles virus, EBV (Epstein-Barr) and hepatitis virus, has also been observed.
“Vaccine-induced temporary immunosuppression is also a factor that may contribute to the post-vaccination spike in coronavirus infections seen in many countries.”
Frequency of Vaccine Related Adverse Event in Cancer
There are already a few thousand observations in official adverse event reporting and online patient groups. There are certainly true coincidences or diagnostic delays due to delayed diagnosis related to containment. But we should not dismiss the huge problems that these real people affected in their daily lives and even more the responsibility that cancer doctors take by imposing the injection before any treatment or protocol continuation. Their main argument: “we did it right, without discussion” does not seem worthy of a once thoughtful profession.
In August 2021, Dr. Ryan Cole, an American pathologist for many years, described a significant increase in certain types of cancer (e.g. endometrial cancer, uterine cancer) since the beginning of the covid mass vaccination campaign. More recently, German pathologists have also noted the problem of post-vaccination immune dysregulation and sudden tumor growth in some patients.
On the French networks, several testimonies coincide with the reappearance of vaginal hemorrhages in women over 85 years of age leading to the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and rapid death… The spike protein produced by the body following the injection is particularly attracted to the genitals, and this would be a new demonstration of this.
So until we know more, let’s be careful, both doctors and caregivers, and not play the sorcerer’s apprentice!
Caution is required with all experimental treatments and even more so when they are the result of a technique never used before in infectious pathology. First, do no harm must guide the decisions of any physician faithful to his Hippocratic oath.
Dr. Nicole Delépine: Pediatrician, oncologist, former head of the pediatric oncology department at the R Poincaré Garches Hospital APHP France
 Les médecins libéraux allemands pour la fin de « la politique de la panique » le 27/09/2021 Dr Stephan Hofmeister, Dr Andreas Gassen, Dr Thomas Kriedel KBV Lopata/axentis.de France-Soir Les principales organisations de médecins conventionnés en Allemagne exigent la fin immédiate des mesures « anti-corona » et la fin de « la rhétorique de l’horreur et la politique de la panique ». Lors de la convention des délégués des médecins conventionnés allemands, le directeur adjoint de la Kassenärztlichen Bundesvereinigung (KBV, association nationale des médecins de l’assurance maladie) le Dr Stephan Hofmeister, et le président, le Dr Andreas Gassen, ont exigé la fin des mesures dites « anti-Corona » en Allemagne et la fin de la « politique de la panique et la rhétorique de l’horreur ». Le communiqué de presse de la KBV déclare : « tous ceux qui souhaitent se faire vacciner ont la possibilité de le faire. Désormais ce n’est plus une décision qui revient à l’État : chacun doit décider à titre individuel pour lui-même. » Selon le Dr Hofmeister les sondages indiquent que plus insistantes se font les pressions politiques, plus les gens refusent toute vaccination en signe de protestation. « C’est une confusion malsaine », a-t-il dit en exigeant que l’on arrête cette politique de la peur.
 Ainsi étaient appelés les déportés qui, en échange de quelques avantages, devenaient complices des nazis et se montraient parfois aussi inhumains que leurs bourreaux.
The Russian government is planning to continue its established policy of eliminating the share of US currency in the country’s economy, according to Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Alexander Pankin.
According to the minister, all transactions processed via the US financial system can be blocked by Washington at its discretion, while the threat of anti-Russian sanctions is still relevant.
“Thus, there is no doubt about the expediency of continuing to work on further reducing the share of the dollar in national and international reserves, as well as its use in settlements with foreign partners,” he said, as quoted by Interfax.
The official added that, in the long run, the US dollar could be replaced by other foreign currencies and digital assets. However, he admitted that eliminating the dollar is associated with “certain costs for businesses and government financial transactions.”
Earlier, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia’s de-dollarization drive is a constant process that is also taking place in many other countries. According to Peskov, the main reason for that is deep concerns over the reliability of the US dollar as the world’s top reserve currency.
Tony Fauci, Shi “batwoman” Zhengli, Bill Gates and various other career criminals each played a role in hatching the idea of covid for the purpose of plunging the world into total chaos and medical fascism.
Even the mainstream media now admits that the official story makes no sense, and that the Chinese Virus was deliberately created as opposed to just appearing out of the blue as a product of nature.
We now know that Fauci funneled millions of American taxpayer dollars to China to conduct illegal gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses – this is an undeniable fact.
A year and a half ago, anyone who suggested any of this was labeled a crazy “conspiracy theorist.” Now, the conspiracy theory is believing that bat soup caused the plandemic.
The Washington Post is one of the corporate media outlets that published leaked intelligence supporting the lab leak hypothesis. The World Health Organization (WHO) also now agrees that Chinese Germs probably did not come from bat meat.
The New Yorker also published what is perhaps the most detailed account of the controversy to date, revealing that — from the beginning — the virus “appeared like a human virus.”
Infectious disease expert says covid “appeared like a human virus almost from day one”
Scripps Research infectious disease expert Kristian Andersen has been confused from the very start about how the Fauci Flu could have spread so rapidly around the world when coronaviruses are not very good at transferring from human to human, let alone from bat to human.
“It seemed to be locked and loaded for causing the pandemic,” Andersen is quoted as saying, his suggestion sounding a lot like the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was concocted by humans, not nature.
“This, almost from day one, appeared like a human virus.”
At the time, Andersen was eager to share his thoughts with Fauci, whom he believed to be an honest and trustworthy doctor. We now know, however, that Fauci is anything but honest and trustworthy.
In his letter, Andersen told Fauci that the SARS-CoV-2 genome seemed “inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.” A “really small part” of the virus had “unusual features,” Andersen added.
“Its spike – the crucial bit of surface protein that a coronavirus uses to invade a cell – appeared able to bind tightly to a human-cell receptor known as ACE2,” Anderson explained, adding that this means “it’s more effective at infecting human cells.”
Another significant trait was a rare insertion into the genome of 12 nucleotides, also known as a furin cleavage site, which may have made the virus more transmissible, Andersen said.
“One has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered,” he added.
Fauci, of course, denies everything. Even though the evidence is everywhere to convict him – and painfully so – Fauci continues to lie, lie and lie some more whenever pressed for answers to the glaring anomalies that demarcate his plandemic narrative.
Strangely enough, Andersen changed his tune not long after making all these statements and inquiries to Fauci. Andersen later said that the notion of the Fauci Flu being concocted in a laboratory was a “crackpot” idea, and that natural transmission makes the most sense.
“A month or two after it surfaced, one guy that studied it early said it had HIV in it,” added a Zero Hedge commenter to the conversation – and keep in mind that Fauci was obsessed with AIDS back in the 1980s. “He said no way that’s in there unless it was put there. All I needed to hear!”
The latest news about Chinese Virus deception can be found at Pandemic.news.
Dr. Patricia Lee, a licensed physician in California, said her experience with patients harmed by the COVID vaccine “does not comport with claims made by federal health authorities regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.”
In a letter dated Sept. 28 to officials at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), an ICU physician detailed her concerns about the adverse reactions, including deaths, she witnessed in people who had received a COVID vaccine.
Dr. Patricia Lee, a licensed physician in California, said her experience with patients harmed by the vaccine “does not comport with claims made by federal health authorities regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.”
In the letter, Lee described observing “entirely healthy individuals suffering serious, often fatal, injuries,” including transverse myelitis, resulting in quadriplegia, pneumocystis pneumonia, multi-system organ failure, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, postpartum hemorrhagic shock and septic shock.
Lee, a practicing physician for more than 20 years, said she “never witnessed so many vaccine-related injuries until this year.”
Lee told Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, and Dr. Tom Shimabukuro with the CDC’s COVID-19 Vaccine Task Force Vaccine Safety Team, that while “causation is difficult to prove definitively, it is my clinical judgment that each of these injuries were caused by a COVID-19 vaccine, because there was no other plausible explanation for these injuries other than the fact that the patients had recently been vaccinated.”
Lee acknowledged that her report reflects the experience of a single physician. However, she wrote, it appears “statistically improbable” that any one physician should witness this many COVID-19 vaccine injuries if the federal health authority claims regarding the vaccines’ safety were accurate.
“I can no longer silently accept the serious harm being caused by the COVID-19 vaccines,” Lee concluded. “It is my sincere hope that the reaction to this letter will not be to focus on me, but rather to focus on addressing the serious safety issues with these products that, without doubt, you have either missed or are choosing to ignore.”
Since the issuing of the original letter, Lee’s attorneys sent another letter to the CDC and FDA saying that the agencies’ “failure to respond is highly concerning,” adding that they are seeking a response so they can “arrange a discussion and information gathering session between Dr. Lee and the appropriate representatives at the CDC and FDA.”
According to an anonymous source, the federal regulatory agency is investigating whether the mRNA jab could lead to higher incidences of the supposedly rare side effect, described as an “inflammation of the heart muscle” by the Mayo Clinic, after several Nordic countries recommended against Moderna’s use in young children.
“Our citizens should know the urgent facts…but they don’t because our media serves imperial, not popular interests. They lie, deceive, connive and suppress what everyone needs to know, substituting managed news misinformation and rubbish for hard truths…”—Oliver Stone