A quick cartoon explanation of the possible “human history” based on the information gathered from all around the world.
A quick cartoon explanation of the possible “human history” based on the information gathered from all around the world.
The views expressed by horse 237 are not necessarily the views of us here at Tales. This post is meant to provoke and anger people in order to open the discussion on the issue.
Pic added by Tales
Nov 28, 2016
I regard Judaism Incorporated as a Criminal Enterprise and neither as a religion nor as a race. Anyone who has read the Talmud knows it is not a religion.
Rabbi Shim’on used to say: “The best of Gentiles – kill him; the best of snakes dash out its brains.”
Robbery of a Gentile by a Jew is not forbidden outright but only under certain circumstances such as ‘when the Gentiles are not under our rule’, but is permitted ‘when they are under our rule’.
Israel Shahak: The Laws Against Non-Jews In 2 Minutes
Being Jewish is not a Race as there are no exclusively Jewish genes. They seem to have accepted many converts to their criminal band from other races such as the Khazars and the Carthaginians to avoid absorption by the Roman Catholic Church.
I would like to focus on Judaism in the modern era when they came into contact with the American Republic. The Jews owned 90% of the ships that brought African slaves to the New World. In the colonial era Jews lobbied the state legislatures to make slavery legal. When the white working and middle classes of Great Britain began voting to outlaw slavery, Judaism Incorporated responded by investing in the Opium trade to replace Slavery’s profits with the more enormous incomes from heroin and now cocaine. Her Majesty’s Jewish Government fought two Opium Wars against China to enrich the Jewish elite.
Video: Jews And The African Slave Trade. It Did Not End In 1832
In modern times the children of minorities are taught to blame whites for slavery because the curriculum is controlled by the Jews. Fewer than 3% of whites owned African slaves but about half of the Jews did.
Judaism Incorporated believed they could enslave the Gentiles of all races through the practice of usury. William Paterson, the Governor of the Bank of England, told his Parliament in 1694 that they had the benefit of interest on money they created out of nothing. The Rothschilds took over the then privately owned Bank of England in 1815. Imagine how much wealth was taken by the Jews from Gentiles over the past 201 years through the charging of interest on money created out of thin air.
President Lincoln could imagine the theft. He issued Greenbacks which were US Treasury Notes that did not require a debt to be created. There was no interest to be paid. Today the US has nearly $20 trillion in debt and pays $500 billion a year in ‘interest.’ Judaism Incorporated repealed the Greenback legislation after they had successfully killed Lincoln. John Wilkes Booth was Jewish. The Union paid out several rewards for his capture but none of these was for the real Booth. Judaism Incorporated killed Presidents Lincoln, McKinley and Kennedy without one Jew being arrested and put on trial.
Crime is legal as soon as you get control of the Gentile’s government. That is a lesson Jews learn from the Talmud. The assassination of McKinley made Theodore van Rosenfeld President of the US. He split the Republican vote in 1912 and allowed Woodrow Wilson to get America into World War I. He set up the Federal Reserve Bank and also the Income tax to pay for his subsidies to the Bankers.
The United States went into WW I so we could make the war last longer. If Wilson had not intervened, the war would have been over in 1915. There would have been no Jewish Communist revolution and no British protectorate for Palestine which Balfour had promised to the Rothschilds. We could have saved ten million Gentiles from dying in WW I and an additional 60 million from dying in Jewish concentration camps in the Soviet Union.
Of course there would have been no WW II and no Korean or Vietnam wars either. North Korea was given to the Soviets after WW II to guarantee a war Americans would not be allowed to win. The Korean and Vietnam wars had the same purpose. Everyone knew Communism was Jewish so anti-Communists were obviously anti-Semitic and deserved to die. The men who owned the US government wanted wars in Korea and Vietnam so they could draft anti-Communists (i.e. anti-Semites) into military service and get them killed. The death penalty for Being Gentile will last as long as Judaism Incorporated owns the government.
Another reason to kill President Kennedy was because the Bankers wanted white Americans to begin taking drugs. This made the Jewish elite even wealthier.
Israel Killed JFK And Has Ruled America Ever Since.
Catherine Austin Fitts told Greg Hunter that the Bankers stole more than $50 trillion from American taxpayers. I disagree only because I think they stole a lot more. I knew before they began to steal money by the tens of trillions that we would become a National Security State. The people who own the government have been blowing up buildings with Americans inside since the attack on the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City in 1985. The controlled demolitions of World Trade Center Towers 1, 2 and 7 on September 11,2001 allowed Judaism Incorporated to profit from trillions in defense spending, to take away our few remaining civil liberties and to send American Gentiles off to kill to Christians and Muslims in the Mideast who dared to live on land claimed by Greater Israel.
Hint: There are more than 300 million people living on the land from the Nile to the Euphrates that Israel arrogantly claims to be theirs. All these people are, by the definition of Tel Aviv, ‘terrorists.’ Good luck killing that many human beings after your nation goes to bankruptcy court.
You might want to take a second look at 911.
Resurrecting Israel Did 911. All the Proof In The World
911: Short And Powerful Questions
America is run by the Banks though it appears that the instruments of power reside in the media, the Foundations, the Universities, Hollywood and the government bureaucracies. Their power derives from Judaism Incorporated. But to understand how things work and how to radically change the future they have planned for us you will need to understand money. Perhaps the simplest way to understand banking is to know the truth about home mortgages. Why is it that a Banker is paid more to sit through a thirty minute meeting with a young couple buying their first home than the plumbing contractor or even the builder?
Mortgages Are Instruments Of Fraud
The next step in understanding money is to know how the monetary system works so you can undo what they have done.
IMF Economists: ‘We Were Wrong.’ Will Someone Please Tell The Press And The Politicians.
And finally you will be ready to take down those who have oppressed you.
Debt Cancellation Is The Best Way To Take Down Bilderberg
This transfer of power could be done non-violently. But we first need to have honest elections. Billionaires of Jewish descent cannot be allowed to own the machines that count Gentile votes.
Recently, I told a small group of people of three different races how Hillary almost won the election. I said Jewish owned voting machines switched their votes from Trump to Hillary. But I remember those same machines doing the same thing for Bush in previous elections. We need to reform the election process so Jewish billionaires cannot switch Gentile votes. This is not a partisan issue. And it is important. Three million Americans starved to death in the Great Depression. We could lose 10 million or more this time if the Jewish press and Jewish owned voting machines do not allow Gentile voices to speak.
Jews have brought in tens of millions of legal and illegal aliens while they sent millions of high paying jobs overseas. They papered over the resulting job losses by creating millions of unnecessary government jobs and by cutting the hours worked of non-governmental employees. The government decided who was to win and who was to lose. And the favored ones were taught to treat whites with contempt. Ana Kasparian on election night 2016 told white men who had been discriminated against in order to reward others that they deserved what happened to them because they were pathetic losers. Her solution is to flood the country with even more non-whites so we become one California.
That will never happen because we have too many Unpayable Debts which were generated by our Jewish banking system. If we had the right to reject that system and to create a non-interest bearing currency and to ban fractional reserve banking, we could save the lives of tens of millions of Americans.
As it stands, the Dollar will crash. We will have Nationwide Food Riots and Race Wars because Judaism Incorporated will allow us to even discuss bank reform on TV. That means violence is the only way they will let us out of the trap they set for us.
The people who own this government and will continue to own it even after Donald Trump’s inauguration will not allow reform. They prefer to start Race Wars.
George Soros, Race Wars And The End Game
We will have martial law as soon as the Nationwide Food Riots begin. We do not have enough soldiers to stop people starving to death from rioting. At that point, junior officers in the US military could intervene to arrest the Bankers and to seize their assets to fund Debt Cancellation. Government debt should be outlawed and every adult citizen given $30,000 either in debt relief or in a retirement credit. A military coup does not need to be violent if the people accept the reforms. The alternative is Race Wars and the death of 80 million or more people. Potentially, a lot more.
How And Why An American Military Coup Could Save The World
For some reason Jewish people do not seem to realize that they will soon be standing between tens of millions of starving people and their ability to feed their families. In the old days on Passover the Jewish leaders committed atrocities against Gentiles in order to train the people in whose countries they sought shelter to hate Jews. Jewish people have not quite learned that their greatest enemy are self-appointed Jewish leaders. Their leaders were never elected to office. Judaism Incorporated does not like elections. And they despise transparency. Jews have not yet assimilated enough to Gentile Ways to practice democracy.
And so that is why I think a US military coup by junior officers is the only way out that does not require we kill each other by the tens of millions.
History has shown that drug prohibition reduces neither use nor abuse. After a rapist is arrested, there are fewer rapes. After a drug dealer is arrested, however, neither the supply nor the demand for drugs is seriously changed.
The arrest merely creates a job opening for an endless stream of drug entrepreneurs who will take huge risks for the sake of the enormous profits created by prohibition.►Prohibition costs taxpayers tens of billions of dollars every year, yet 40 years and some 40 million arrests later, drugs are cheaper, more potent and far more widely used than at the beginning of this futile crusade.
We at L.E.A.P.(Law Enforcement Against Prohibition)( http://www.leap.cc )believe that by eliminating prohibition of all drugs for adults and establishing appropriate regulation and standards for distribution and use, law enforcement could focus more on crimes of violence, such as rape, aggravated assault, child abuse and murder, making our communities much safer.
We believe that sending parents to prison for non-violent personal drug use destroys families. We believe that in a regulated and controlled environment, drugs will be safer for adult use and less accessible to our children. And we believe that by placing drug abuse in the hands of medical professionals instead of the criminal justice system, we will reduce rates of addiction and overdose deaths.
What the hell is wrong with the British people? They seem to live in a fantasy fairy tale where they allow German parasites-bastards to rule over them. No wonder Britain is drowning in an alcohol-drug-sex abuse frenzy. (Britain is the #1 consumer of cocaine in Europe and has the highest infection rates for gonorrhea). That’s what happens when you believe in lies and bullshit. Get rid of these parasites England.
And fix your own damned house pathetic moochers.
A planned £369 million refurbishment to Buckingham Palace has got some people calling for an end to the monarchy. But what exactly would that look like?
The Royal Family (Photo: Lefteris Pitarakis AP/Press Association Images)
Once again, some people are unhappy with the Royal Family. First it was the announcement last week that the Treasury intends to spend £369 million on doing up Buckingham Palace in the middle of a housing crisis, and then – bizarrely, given the outrage over the refurbishment handout – the Palace put out a job advert for a new gardener, offering a salary that works out at less than the London Living Wage.
Both of these things have provoked “action”, with former journalist Mark Johnson starting a popular online petition demanding that the royals pay for repairs themselves. Bloggers on Royal Central – which, in fairness, is essentially a royals fan site – and The Spectator have pointed out that it is actually money generated through an additional tax on the Crown Estate that will fund the work, not money from the British taxpayer, but for many that still doesn’t justify the huge amount of cash being spent on the Palace as the rest of the country falls apart.
Either way, none of this is particularly new; anti-monarchy petitions have always had a presence online. Yet polls consistently show that people prefer Jubilee bunting and ritualised deference to democratic accountability. In fact, about 70 percent of the UK’s population continually say they would rather keep the royals than chuck them.
But imagine a world in which that statistic leant the other way. Theoretically, what would it take to actually remove the royals from the throne, and what would happen once they were gone? I’m glad you asked.
Republic is an organisation campaigning for a “democratic alternative to the monarchy”. Pia de Keyser, the group’s campaigns officer, says their vision of change involves years of healthy public discourse, gradually pushing the issue onto the political agenda, before provoking a national referendum.
“Since Brexit, we do definitely feel that we wouldn’t want any referendum to do with this to be as divisive,” she says over the phone. “There would need to be a sizeable majority before the referendum would be held – it wouldn’t be a case of ’51 percent would do it’. Public education should be far more balanced and accurate, unlike Brexit, where so many people were googling ‘What is the EU?’ right before it.”
Historian Phillip Murphy tells me the warm fuzzy feelings people have towards the monarchy are mostly for Elizabeth herself, rather than the institution as a concept. “I think as long as she’s there, there will be pretty strong support,” he says over the phone. “But once she’s gone, there may be a change of mood.”
Relative to the Queen, Charles isn’t exactly popular. He’s been criticised in the past for sticking his oar into political matters, and if he kept at that it would highlight the problematic royal prerogative powers monarchs still technically have. Pure speculation here, but I can’t imagine that would do much for his ratings.
A referendum in favour of a republic would only be the start. De Keyser says Republicans don’t have a concrete vision of what post-monarchy Britain would look like – and that they wouldn’t yet want to. “Like Brexit, we would be facing a situation that we haven’t had to take through Parliament before. It could be quick, but like with Brexit, my instinct would be not to rush it,” she explains. “The ideal would be that we would slowly, pragmatically walk through it.”
Beyond the whole “what, so we’re getting a president now?” chat, this process would also involve lots of complicated legal disentanglements, like working out who would occupy the position of head of the Commonwealth and the Church of England.
Also, as Murphy says, you’ve got to be careful that a restructuring of political power doesn’t just leave a new demagogic-shaped hole to be filled. “In a world in which Donald Trump has just been elected, and in which Marine Le Pen seems to be within fighting distance of the French presidency, even people on the left now might be thinking, ‘Do we really want Nigel Farage as our president?'” he points out. “Which might be the likely result of a national election for a president.”
Anti-monarchy campaigns tend to revolve around the injustice of the massive amounts of wealth and privilege commanded by a select few people lucky enough to be born into the right family. So, the thinking goes, in a post-monarchy UK, while the royals would still have a private wealth in the multi-millions – thanks in part to their extensive property portfolio – all profits generated by the Crown Estate would be handed over to the people.
Currently, the Queen pays an 85 percent tax on earnings generated through the Crown Estate – a huge property and land portfolio, including Regent Street and Buckingham Palace, worth about £12 billion – with the remaining 15 percent going to her to pay for stuff like royal travel and Palace garden parties. According to Murphy, this 15 percent going to the people instead wouldn’t do much to correct social and economic imbalances.
“You might hope that it would change British society,” he says, “but some of those divisions – the aristocracy, the power of public schools, the power of Oxbridge – unless you really radically changed the way society is governed, they would still be there in the social character of Great Britain.”
This year that 15 percent worked out at nearly £43 million, which is admittedly just a fraction of the £1 billion the NHS spends every three days, but, you know, every little helps. And what of Buckingham Palace, which – as part of the Crown Estate – would also theoretically be handed over?
“The 750 barely used rooms in the Palace would hopefully become a huge central community hub, or a museum, or a centre for education, or a hub for democracy,” says de Keyser.
“There’s the sense that [the royals] themselves are sort of trapped in many ways,” says de Keyser. “In terms of the human rights that the rest of us have, like freedom of expression and movement and choice of marriage partner, they are massively curtailed from enjoying.”
So in a republic, the Royal Family would be free to be whatever they wanted to be. EDM DJs! Chartered surveyors! Openly xenophobic! But in all likelihood, as Murphy says, “They would certainly still be on the guest list of any trendy party in London, New York or Paris.”
So we wouldn’t have to worry too much about them.
These simple tips will help you breeze through the apocalypse…or at least the next power outage.
Source: 21 Life Hacks for Preppers
Posted Nov 28, 2016
Life hacks are all over the place at the minute (seriously, they’re everywhere) and some are really good – but often they’re more Martha Stewart than Grizzly Adams.
Here are a few life hacks that are applicable not only to regular everyday lifestyles but to those crazy preppers – ahem – people who are of a preparedness mindset as well. While all of these aren’t necessarily life-saving, they all have the potential to save you money and effort in a survival situation.
Can’t get enough prepper hacks? Check out Jim Cobb’s book, Prepper’s Survival Hacks with 50 cool DIYs. One of them just might save your life one day.
Please feel free to share any information from this site in part or in full, leaving all links intact, giving credit to the author and including a link to this website and the following bio. Daisy Luther is a single mom who lives in a small village in the mountains of Northern California, where she homeschools her youngest daughter and raises veggies, chickens, and a motley assortment of dogs and cats. She is a best-selling author who has written several books, including The Organic Canner, The Pantry Primer: A Prepper’s Guide to Whole Food on a Half-Price Budget, and The Prepper’s Water Survival Guide: Harvest, Treat, and Store Your Most Vital Resource. Daisy is a prolific blogger who has been widely republished throughout alternative media. On her website, The Organic Prepper, Daisy uses her background in alternative journalism to provide a unique perspective on health, self-reliance, personal liberty, and preparedness. You can follow her on Facebook, Pinterest, and Twitter,.
Scores of Atlantic herring are washing up on the shores around St. Marys Bay, N.S., but the reason isn’t clear.
Within the last week, the herring have appeared on a 20-kilometre stretch of shoreline running between Marshalltown and Gilberts Cove.
“It seems to be a bit of a unique event in terms of just the sheer numbers that are showing up dead,” said Shawn Craik, a biology professor at Université Sainte-Anne.
‘Thousands of fish’
On Friday, Craik took some students to the shore at Gilberts Cove. He said that in some spots, there were eight fish washed up in a square-metre block.
“If you extrapolate that over the entire beach, we’re talking about thousands of fish,” he said.
While there, he spoke with a clam fisherman who said that in his 40 years of clamming on the beach, he had never seen anything like this.
The Digby detachment of Fisheries and Oceans Canada began receiving calls from concerned citizens about the problem on Tuesday, said Gary Hutchins, the detachment’s conservation and protection supervisor.
He said samples have been sent to Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s lab in Moncton and the results are expected back the middle of next week.
“There could be several causes,” said Hutchins.
He thinks it could be a parasite, a pollutant in the water or it could be a natural phenomenon such as a predator pursuing the herring into the St. Marys Bay area and forcing them onto the shore.
Craik said the situation is alarming given the role herring play as an important forage fish for species such as seabirds, whales and even cod, especially given their nutritional composition. The number of calories per gram of herring is much higher than most other forage fish.
“If we’re losing our herring, then these animals have to go to second or third best [sources], which may offer a lot less energy,” said Craik.
While most of the bodies of the herring are intact, some are being eaten by scavenging birds. The fact so many herring remain intact on the beach is an indication of their abundance.
“The likelihood of a fish persisting on a beach for any length of time is pretty small, unless the local scavenger population is full,” said Ted Leighton, an adjunct biology professor at Université Sainte-Anne.
Leighton and Craik dissected some of the herring and didn’t see any signs of disease.
One of the perplexing things to Leighton is that if the cause is a pollutant in the water, then other species should have been affected.
“That could knock out a whole a lot of fish. It usually also has secondary effects on other species, which we haven’t seen. We haven’t seen dead birds, dead seals and dead everything else on the beach,” said Leighton.
That being said, he isn’t ruling out a pollutant.
Whatever the cause, the problem remains.
“The process seems to be continuing because there are new dead and dying fish arriving with each tide, so something is happening out there in the waters of St. Marys Bay,” said Leighton.
With permission from
by: Vicki Batts
November 28, 2016
(NaturalNews) The cannabis plant’s medicinal value is virtually unmatched by any modern medicine – even scientific evidence has shown us that. And yet, for some reason, the DEA continues to ignore the mountains of evidence that medical marijuana can, and does, help millions of people across the United States.
Take, for example, the 100 million-some-odd people in the U.S. who suffer with debilitating chronic pain. Many of those people have had no choice but to turn to opioid pain relievers – you know, the drugs that are creating an addiction epidemic in our country and countless others. Those prescription painkillers are responsible for thousands of deaths each year. The American Society of Addiction Medicine estimates that 1.9 million people suffer with an addiction involving prescription painkillers, and over half a million people suffer with heroin addiction. The agency also notes that 4 out of 5 new heroin users started out on opioid painkillers. Estimates from the CDC have suggested that the majority of people who die from an opioid overdose had a prescription and were not using the drugs illegally.
Clearly, opioids are problematic in our society. And yet, for some reason, the immense and extreme detrimental side effects of opioids – like addiction, accidental overdose and death – are somehow not severe enough to outweigh their potential medicinal value.
This would possibly be an acceptable rationale, if marijuana – which has a low potential for addiction and has an extremely low risk of overdose – was not illegal because the powers that be maintain that any benefit received from cannabis is vastly overpowered by its “risk” potential. It simply doesn’t make any sense, and is totally contrary to what quite a bit of research has revealed.
This hypocrisy is underlined by recent research which revealed that cannabis is actually being used as an “exit drug” to help people get off street drugs like heroin, and even opioid painkillers. Zach Walsh, associate professor of the University of British Columbia, led the systematic review, which was published in the journal Clinical Psychology Review. Walsh commented, “Research suggests that people may be using cannabis as an exit drug to reduce the use of substances that are potentially more harmful, such as opioid pain medication.”
Other studies have shown that marijuana could actually be used to help cure opioid addiction by reducing the severity of withdrawal symptoms. One study from Columbia University, found that patients given THC during recovery experienced less severe symptoms and were more likely to continue with the treatment program. Another study from the University of Michigan, found that medical marijuana could also be used to replace the use of opioid drugs in pain management, and reduced the need for the prescription painkillers. In fact, 185 patients reported a 45 percent overall improvement in their quality of life after making the switch. Patients also reported a 64 percent reduction in use of their conventional opioid medications.
Essentially, science is indicating that in addition to helping people currently addicted to opioids, medical cannabis could actually help bring an end to the epidemic by providing a safe alternative to begin with.
There are veritable mountains of evidence, both scientific and anecdotal in nature, affirming that cannabis does indeed have medical value. And yet the DEA continues to make obtuse and uninformed statements about marijuana. In discussing cannabis prior to the agency’s most recent ruling, Russ Baer, a staff coordinator in the Office of Congressional and Public Affairs at the DEA, brazenly stated, “There’s no safe, effective medical use, and a high abuse potential, and it can’t be used in medical settings.”
These sentiments have no basis in reality. Baer himself acknowledged this when he noted that the plant has many medical uses. He claims that the government needs to sort out which of the compounds in marijuana are beneficial and which ones aren’t.
These bureaucrats are failing miserably at hiding the fact that Big Pharma intends to create medications based on the plant’s compounds. Why allow the whole plant to be used when you can divvy it up into parts and sell them all for money? They’ve already done it with a product called Dronabinol.
Almost 30 years ago, in 1988, the DEA’s own administrative law judge, Francis Young, recommended rescheduling cannabis. Young stated that “marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. By any measure of rational analysis marijuana can be safely used within a supervised routine of medical care.” Unsurprisingly, the DEA denied the petition anyway.
Recent studies have also shown that in 2013 – when just 17 states had medical marijuana laws – medical marijuana contributed to just over $165 million in savings on prescription drugs. Since that time, medical marijuana use has expanded quite a bit. Imagine what those states are probably saving in care costs now. That clears things up a little bit, right?
The failure of the DEA to reschedule cannabis and acknowledge the medicinal value of this plant is an embarrassment. There is, at this point, one reason – and one reason only – that would explain why our government has failed to keep with current science – and that’s money.
Nov 24, 2016
This simple trick could prevent a lot of distress…
Food poisoning is no joke. Unfortunately, many people are unaware of how fresh the food in their fridge and freezer are when they return home from a long trip or vacation. If the power went out for a day or two (sometimes a few hours will do the trick), meats and other temperamental products could defrost and go bad.
Rather than deal with the consequences of eating spoiled food, try this trick provided by Brightside. Before you leave the house for an extended period of time, fill a cup with water and place it in the freezer. When the water is frozen, place a coin on the top and return it to the freezer
If you return to your home and see that the coin is at the bottom of the cup, this is a clear sign that the power was out long enough for the food to melt and re-freeze. In this scenario, it is probably best to dispose of the sensitive food items.
Though food waste is a serious problem in America (where 40% of all food ends up in the trash), it’s better to be safe than sorry in the event that the coin is at the bottom of the cup and throw away any items you’re skeptical about.
Pass this tip along to others!
Credit: Juicing For Health
This is why multiple countries, like Japan do not recommend it as part of their routinely vaccination schedule for children, and perhaps this is why more doctors are not recommending it to patients.
For example, a new study recently published in the journal Pediatrics has found that many paediatricians don’t strongly recommend the HPV vaccine. Researchers used a national survey asking approximately 600 doctors to outline their stance on the HPV vaccine. Conducted between October 2013 and January 2014, the study found that a large percentage of paediatricians and family doctors — nearly one third of those surveyed — are not strongly recommending the HPV vaccine to parents and preteens, which is why HPV vaccination rates continue to drop.
“When one looks at the independent literature, so studies that are not sponsored by the vaccine manufacturers, um, so with relation to Gardasil there have been several reports documenting multiple sclerosis and encephalitis, which is brain inflammation, in girls who have received their Gardasil vaccine, so, just because a study sponsored by the manufacturers does not identify problems with the vaccine does not necessarily mean the vaccine is safe. Um, in fact if one looks at the manufacturer studies, they’re often not designed to detect serious adverse events. There was a study done by a group of researchers sponsored by Glaxo Smith and Kline and they were looking at Cervarix, which is another HPV vaccine, and the authors acknowledged that none of the studies that they evaluated have been designed to detect autoimmune diseases. So obviously, you’re not going to find what you’re not looking for. And in spite of these obvious flaws, they concluded that there is no evidence that Cervarix is associated with, um, increased risk for autoimmune diseases, and this is absurd because you haven’t looked for it, the study has not been designed to detect autoimmune diseases.” – Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, Post-doctoral Fellow at the University of British Columbia where she works in Neurosciences and the Department of Medicine (source)
The truth is that vaccine safety is not at all rock solid, and serious adverse reactions following routine vaccinations in children have always been reported, and seemingly underreported, in my opinion. Perhaps this is why billions of dollars have been paid out to families through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, despite the fact that it protects pharmaceutical companies for any blame.
Plus, we have yet to identify genetic factors that make a certain population more prone to adverse reactions.
Injuries include deaths, permanent neurological damage, disabling autoimmune and/or inflammatory conditions have also been clearly described in scientific literature. Here is a great article written by Tomljenovic, quoted above, going into more detail.
In-fact, she recently published a study in the Journal Immunologic Research documenting more concerns with the HPV vaccine.(source)
Below is a clip from the recently released film, Vaxxed, of a boy named Colton and his mother Kathleen who share his story of vaccine injury following the Gardasil vaccine with the Vaxxed team in Oren. Another story that will hopefully spark more questions and dialogue within the mainstream medical community.
Dr. Dianne Harper, one of a select few specialists in OB/GYN (in the world) who helped design and carry out the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies to get Gardasil approved. There are only 50 HPV experts in the world, and Dr. Harper is one of them, inarguably making her an expert on the subject.
She brings up an interesting point, that of all the women who get an HPV infection, approximately 70 percent of those will clear that infection all by themselves in the first year. You don’t even have to detect it or treat it. Within two years, approximately 90 percent of those women will clear it all by themselves. By three years, you will have 10 percent of that original group of women left who still have an HPV infection, and 5 percent of this 10 percent will have progressed into a pre-cancerous lesion. So, “now you have that small group of women who have pre-cancerous lesions and now let’s look at that moving into invasive carcinoma. What we know then is that amongst women with. . . [pre-cancerous] lesions. . . it takes five years for about twenty percent of them to become invasive carcinomas. That’s a pretty slow process. It takes about thirty years for forty percent of them to become invasive cervical carcinomas.” (source)
This begs the question, why do nine-year old girls need vaccinations for symptomless venereal diseases that their immune systems kill anyway?
Harper has told CBS that these vaccines are essentially useless, explaining that “the benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated.”
She also goes on to caution of their dangers:
Parents and women must know that deaths occurred. Not all deaths that have been reported were represented in Dr. Slade’s work, one-third of the death reports were unavailable to the CDC, leaving the parents of the deceased teenagers in despair that the CDC is ignoring the very rare but real occurrences that need not have happened if parents were given information stating that there are real, but small risks of death surrounding the administration of Gardasil.
“It is a vaccine that’s been highly marketed, the benefits are over-hyped, and the dangers are underestimated.” – Dr. Chris Shaw, Professor at the University of British Columbia, in the department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Visual Sciences (Taken from the One More Girl documentary)
“It has recently come to the attention of the College that one of the recommended vaccines could possibly be associated with the very rare but serious condition of premature ovarian failure (POF), also known as premature menopause. There have been two case report series (3 cases each) published since 2013 in which post-menarcheal adolescent girls developed laboratory documented POF within weeks to several years of receiving Gardasil, a four-strain human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV4).”
The press release goes on to state that adverse reactions are not commonly caused by the vaccine, and that there has not been a noticeable rise in POF cases in the last 9 years that the vaccine has been widely used. This is not the first time a statement from a government medical agency has contradicted the evidence of various scientists and doctors around the world. Nevertheless, it’s great to see them at least acknowledge these potentials, stating that there are “legitimate concerns that should be addressed.”
You can read more about that here.
Dr. Genevieve Rail, Professor of Critical Studies of Health at Concordia University, recently received a grant of $270,000 from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) to study the Human Papillomavirus (HPV). She concluded that there is absolutely no proof that the human papillomavirus directly causes cervical cancer.
“I’m sort of raising a red flag, out of respect for what I’ve found in my own study, and for the despair of parents who had totally perfect 12-year-olds who are now in their beds, too tired to go to school,” she said. “Yes, we’re going against the grain, and we are going against those who are believed, i.e. doctors and nurses and people in public health.” (source)
She feels there are “serious concerns” about the vaccine, yet no research on how young people “experience” the vaccine. (source)
You can read more about this story here.
Dr. Barrett made the remarks on Sunday, while discussing a spike in hatred-filled attacks against Muslims across the US.
Three mosques in California received letters warning that the Republican president-elect would “cleanse” the country of Muslims, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) reported Saturday.
This is while, according to the FBI, hate crimes, particularly against Muslims, grew by 6.8 percent in 2015 to a total of 5,850 incidents reported throughout the year, compared with the 5,479 incidents reported in 2014.
Barrett said the letters were “disturbing” and indicated a bitter truth after nearly 15 years of Islamophobia that ensued from the 9/11 attacks.
“Many American Muslims are very upset as are many American fair-minded people, specially people on the left-side of the political spectrum who are looking at this Trump presidency which is unleashing all kinds of extreme… racist and nationalistic hatreds and rhetoric,” the analyst added.
Barrett said things like this raise much-needed awareness about the US government’s atrocities against Muslims around the world under the guise of the so-called war on terror.
“People have not really been worried about that; the kind of people who voted for [Democratic presidential nominee] Hillary Clinton and maybe even Bernie sanders… do not seem particularly concerned that 2 million people have been murdered by their tax dollars all over the world,” he explained.
This is while Trump has also prompted outrage among Muslim and non-Muslim communities in the US by proposing a temporary ban on all Muslims from entering the US. He has also called for special IDs to that make tracking Muslims easier.
“Now with Trump in the White House, somebody who walks and talks a little bit like an American Hitler… and these storm trooper followers, or maybe false flaggers for all we know,” he said, hoping that the public would “wake up” to the reality of the 9/11 attacks.
“Again, it was a public relations stunt designed to launch a 100-year war on Islam on behalf of Israel,” Barrett said of the attacks against the Twin Towers in New York.
Four organisms that show nature isn’t so easily categorised.
Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex
You might have played the game called “animal, vegetable, mineral”. One player thinks of an object or organism and the other players ask questions to try to guess what it is – starting with this simple classification. But nature isn’t this simple. There are dozens of groups of living species that are neither plants nor animals.
We tend to think of plants as organisms that stand still and use photosynthesis to produce energy from sunlight and make their own organic molecules from the soil. And we see animals as creatures that move and feed on other organisms to obtain the energy and molecules they need.
But many organisms challenge those descriptions. The Venus flytrap, despite being a plant, feeds on other organisms – and some of its parts move faster than its unfortunate animal prey. Many groups of animals do not move and live attached to a surface for most of their life, including sponges, corals, mussels and barnacles to name a few.
It’s still relatively easy to say whether these creatures are plants or animals. But there are other organisms whose nature is more mystifying. Here are a few of the most intriguing creatures who defy our simple categories.
Sea anemones are technically animals, but they look so much like plants that they are named after a group of flowers. Even Aristotle, the ancient Greek who produced one of the world’s first systems for categorising life, was puzzled by them. He classified anemones as “zoophytes”, organisms bearing traits of both groups.
The truth is that they are animals because they can (very slowly) move and feed on other unsuspecting organisms that get trapped in their tentacles. In fact, sea anemones belong to a group of animals called cnidarians, which also includes jellyfish. Interestingly, there are even components of their nervous system that are the same as humans’, although their anatomy is very different.
To make things even more confusing, there is a cnidarian called the “Venus flytrap sea anemone” that completely looks the part. It is a brilliant example of convergent evolution, where unrelated organisms independently evolve similar adaptations (for example, the wings of birds and bats). In this case, it is an animal that looks like a plant that imitates a carnivorous plant that feeds like an animal.
Chlorophyll is the green pigment in plant cells that enables photosynthesis to happen, and is one of the defining traits of plants. But some animals use a very clever trick: they steal those solar-powered factories and use them to their benefit, a process aptly named kleptoplasty.
The gorgeous sea slug Elysia chlorotica was once described as “a leaf that crawls”. They can borrow chloroplasts from its algal snacks, sucking them with a structure that pretty much looks like a straw, pushing the concept of veganism to the limit. These sea slugs have specialised cells that can keep those chloroplasts for months. What’s more, they also use the stolen chlorophyll for camouflage. The blue dragon slug, Pteraeolidia ianthina, can go a step further. Instead of keeping chloroplasts from is food, is able to enslave whole algal cells.
Creatures that are not animals or plants are often informally called protists. Many in this category are in the habit of robbing plastids from algae or subjugating other single-celled organisms. These include dinoflagellates, ciliates and foraminiferans. In this way, all these organisms are able to use an animal-like behaviour (eating other organisms) to acquire plant-like traits (photosynthesis), getting a higher return from their sunbathing sessions than their peers.
Algae are mostly aquatic organisms that we often think of as single-celled lifeforms that appear as a kind of growth or slime on top of bodies of water in a range of colours. But there are also multicellular types of algae that look far more like plants – even though they often don’t have roots or leaves as we traditionally think about them. Even though they have evolved separately, algae are like plants in that they don’t move and can photosynthesise.
If you have been to a beach, you most likely have run or swam into the sea lettuce Ulva, which despite its name is not a vegetable but a green alga. Nori seaweed is commonly used in Japanese cuisine to wrap delicious bits of sushi and rice – and red dulse is a snack in Ireland and Iceland that some claim tastes like bacon when fried. But in spite of their plantlike appearances and animal-like tastes, nori and dulse are scrumptious red algae.
Another example is kelp, which forms astonishing massive underwater forests – some specimens reach the impressive length of 80 metres – and is also a key ingredient in many Asian meals. Despite its size, kelp belongs to the brown algae, and is unrelated to plants.
Mushrooms are often treated like vegetables but fungi (which includes yeast and mould) are actually closer to animals than plants, and form an entirely separate kingdom. Like plants, they do not move, but they also don’t perform photosynthesis. Instead their source of molecules and energy are other organisms. But instead of “hunting” them like animals, they either grow on top of them (soil, trees, human feet) or on top of decaying dead organisms (dead bark, dead animals, your bread). Due to their close evolutionary relationship to animals, eating a portabello mushroom in a bun is much closer to eating a hamburger than other veggie substitutes.
What’s more, they can grow much bigger than any plant (or animal, for that matter), with the individual heads all part of one giant organism spread out underground. The humungous honey fungus, Armillaria, is allegedly able to cover up to nine square kilometres of forest, weigh up to 35,000 tons and live up to 2,400 years. These fungi are agents of a major forest pest, the “white rot” root disease, which slowly kills numerous trees.
Nature is diverse, beautiful and complicated, always defying simple definitions. Human perception can be easily deceived by the intricacy of live beings. But none of this complexity impedes us from making delicious food out of almost every organism we encounter.