The legal ‘drugs’ we take today, both over-the-counter and prescription medication, are responsible for at least 100,000 deaths per year in the United States alone. As many reports have indicated, most of the published research supporting these drugs is completely false; results are manipulated in order to get products onto the market as quickly as possible, rather than to ensure their safety.
This kind of corruption in rampant in the industry and poses a significant risk to public health and safety. A recent study published last week in The British Medical Journal by researchers at the Nordic Cochrane Center in Copenhagen, for example, determined that pharmaceutical companies were not disclosing all information regarding the results of their drug trials. You can read more about that here.
We are now more than a decade past when the most widely accessed article in the history of the Public Library of Science (PLoS) was published — a scathing review of medical fraud — and the problem has only worsened. Medical professionals still risk their jobs and reputations to get the message out there and educate the public. Dr. Richard Horton, the current Editor-In-Chief of The Lancet, is just one prominent example:
The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. (source)
This is quite concerning, particularly given the fact that most graduates coming out of medical school today are educated extensively on prescription drugs. That education, however, is based on flawed, biased, and/or outright falsified research. They are being groomed for the medical establishment by those who stand to profit the most, and it’s not consumers. Unfortunately, many doctors remain entirely unaware of the deep systemic issues plaguing their profession.
Dr. Peter Gotzche, co-founder of the Cochrane Collaboration (the world’s foremost body in assessing medical evidence), published a paper last year in The Lancet arguing against the use of antidepressants and explaining their dangers.
“It’s remarkable that nobody raises an eyebrow when we kill so many of our own citizens with drugs.” (source)
These deaths can be difficult to measure and report on, however, because they do not happen instantaneously; they are the result of prolonged use over a stretched out period.
Gotzche’s two main areas of focus are antidepressants and “non-steroidal anti-inflammatory” painkillers like ibuprofen, tylenol, celecoxib, and diclofenac. Another is Vioxx, which was actually withdrawn after it was discovered that it had caused more than 100,000 cases of serious heart disease in the United States during the five years that it was on the market.
According to Gotzche, these deaths are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the failure of the drug regulatory process to protect patients:
These terms for our drugs are invented by the drug industry. They had a huge financial interest in calling these things anti-inflammatory. It lured doctors into believing that these drugs somehow also had an effect on the disease process and reduced the joint damage.The Problem With Ibuprofen & Other Commonly Used Pain Killers
It wasn’t long ago that researchers from Ohio State University discovered that the commonly used pain reliever acetaminophen possessed a previously unknown side effect: it kills positive emotions. In the study, participants administered acetaminophen reported feeling fewer strong emotions when they were shown both very pleasant or very disturbing photos compared to those who took placebos. You might be thinking correlation doesn’t mean causation, but when you use the Bradford Hill criteria, and take into account the many other studies which examine the psychological effects of over-the-counter pain killers, the picture becomes clearer. (source)(source)
“In all, rather than being labeled as merely a pain reliever, acetaminophen might be better described as an all-purpose emotion reliever… [and] it is apparent that using acetaminophen for the treatment of pain might have broader consequences than previously thought.” – Geoffrey Durso, lead author of the study and a doctoral student in social psychology at The Ohio State University (source)
It’s also important to note here that the use of pain killers (like aspirin and ibuprofen) has been associated with heart failure risk. A review of 754 clinical trials (published in The Lancet) found that pain killers (ibuprofen in particular) have been estimated to be a contributing factor in the deaths of thousands of people each year. According to the lead researcher of that review, long term use of these drugs caused thousands of heart attacks, as well as sudden cardiac deaths, between the years 1999-2003. In this case, the drug Vioxx was singled out. And as Reuters reports, researchers maintain that “long-term high-dose use of painkillers such as ibuprofen or diclofenac is ‘equally hazardous’ in terms of heart attack risk as use of the drug Vioxx, which was withdrawn due to its potential dangers.” (source) (source)(source)
These drugs are categorized as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and they are linked to potentially devastating side effects, particularly in the elderly. In the United States alone, 100,000 people who takes NSAIDs are hospitalized every single year, and approximately 15,000 die. These pain killers have been linked to a 40-60 percent increase in cardiovascular problems compared to non-users, as well as hearing loss, gastrointestinal complications, heart failure, miscarriages, and allergic reactions; and the numbers are high. In total, approximately 60 million Americans are taking NSAIDS, with Ibuprofen being one of the most common. (source)(source)ource]